The coverage and challenges of increasing uptake of non-National Immunization Program vaccines in China: a scoping review

Table 3 Theme and sub-themes distribution of non-NIP vaccine coverage challenges

Thematic dimension	Frequency (percentage)
Access [44, 47, 49,50,51,52, 54, 55, 57, 59,60,61]	12 (63.2%)
Capacity of the service provider [44, 54, 55, 59,60,61]	6 (31.6%)
Ease of access to services [44, 51, 52, 55, 59]	5 (26.3%)
Place of residency [44, 49,50,51,52, 57, 60]	7 (36.8%)
Supply of vaccines [47, 51, 52, 54, 55, 60, 61]	7 (36.8%)
Affordability [43,44,45, 47, 49,50,51,52,53,54,55, 57, 58, 60, 61]	15 (78.9%)
Vaccine price [43,44,45, 47, 49,50,51,52,53,54, 57, 58, 60, 61]	14 (73.7%)
Government subsidy [43, 51, 52, 55]	4 (21.1%)
Awareness [43, 45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58, 60]	16 (84.2%)
Vaccine awareness [43, 45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58, 60]	16 (84.2%)
Acceptance [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58, 60]	17 (89.5%)
Vaccine safety and efficacy [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58, 60]	17 (89.5%)
Perceived susceptibility of being infected [43, 45,46,47, 49, 51, 52, 54, 56,57,58]	11 (57.9%)
Personal health beliefs [43, 46,47,48,49,50,51,52, 56]	9 (47.4%)
Interpersonal and media influence [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52, 54,55,56,57, 60]	15 (78.9%)
Activation [53, 60]	2 (10.5%)
Effective interventions [53, 60]	2 (10.5%)

“Frequency” referred to the number of times a particular theme appears in each article, and the corresponding “percentage” was calculated by dividing the number of occurrences by the total number of 19 articles
NIP National Immunization Program

ISSN: 2049-9957