Open Access

High-throughput screening against thioredoxin glutathione reductase identifies novel inhibitors with potential therapeutic value for schistosomiasis

  • Ting Li1,
  • Peter D. Ziniel2,
  • Pan-qing He3,
  • Valerie P. Kommer2,
  • Gregory J. Crowther3,
  • Min He1,
  • Qing Liu1,
  • Wesley C. Van Voorhis3,
  • David L. Williams2 and
  • Ming-Wei Wang1Email author
Infectious Diseases of Poverty20154:40

DOI: 10.1186/s40249-015-0071-z

Received: 30 June 2015

Accepted: 12 August 2015

Published: 31 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Schistosomiasis, a parasitic disease also known as bilharzia and snail fever, is caused by different species of flatworms, such as Schistosoma mansoni (S. mansoni). Thioredoxin glutathione reductase (TGR) from S. mansoni (SmTGR) is a well-characterized drug target for schistosomiasis, yet no anti-SmTGR compounds have reached clinical trials, suggesting that therapeutic development against schistosomiasis might benefit from additional scaffolds targeting this enzyme.

Methods

A high-throughput screening (HTS) assay in vitro against SmTGR was developed and applied to a diverse compound library. SmTGR activity was quantified with ThioGlo®, a reagent that fluoresces upon binding to the free sulfhydryl groups of the reaction product GSH (reduced glutathione).

Results

We implemented an HTS effort against 59,360 synthetic compounds. In the primary screening, initial hits (928 or 1.56 %) showing greater than 90 % inhibition on SmTGR activity at a final concentration of 10 μM for each compound were identified. Further tests were carried out to confirm the effects of these hits and to explore the concentration-dependent response characteristics. As a result, 74 of them (0.12 %) representing 17 chemical scaffolds were confirmed and showed a great concentration-dependent inhibitory trend against SmTGR, including structures previously shown to be lethal to schistosomal growth. Of these, two scaffolds displayed a limited structure-activity relationship. When tested in cultured larvae, 39 compounds had cidal activity in 48 h, and five of them killed larvae completely at 3.125 μM. Of these, three compounds also killed adult worms ex vivo at concentrations between 5 μM and 10 μM.

Conclusion

These confirmed hits may serve as starting points for the development of novel therapeutics to combat schistosomiasis.

Keywords

High-throughput screening Schistosomiasis Inhibitor Thioredoxin glutathione reductase

Background

Schistosome parasites infect an estimated 200 million people, of which 20 million have significant morbidity, resulting in more than 200,000 deaths annually. It is estimated that nearly 800 million people are at risk of infection [13]. At present, schistosomiasis control strategies rely almost exclusively on chemotherapy; tens of millions of people are treated with the only available drug, praziquantel (PZQ) [4, 5]. With the current levels of drug use, it is inevitable that PZQ-resistant parasites will evolve. Since no new drugs are in the clinical pipeline to replace it, it is imperative to identify new targets and drug candidates for schistosomiasis treatment.

Mechanisms to maintain redox balance have been shown to be essential for schistosome worm survival. Previous studies have found significant differences between the redox network of schistosomes and their human hosts, with worm defenses being significantly less robust [69]. An important chokepoint in the redox network is thioredoxin glutathione reductase (TGR), which replaces three enzyme activities found in humans: glutathione reductase, thioredoxin reductase, and glutaredoxin (deglutathionylation) [8, 9]. Using RNAi (RNA interference) and chemical probes, TGR has been shown to be an essential worm protein and a druggable target. A screen against the schistosome redox pathway of TGR and peroxiredoxin-2 identified oxadiazole-2-oxides as novel TGR inhibitors with significant in vivo activity against laboratory infections [1013]. Here we present results from a new high-throughput screening (HTS) effort against Schistosoma mansoni (S. mansoni) TGR (SmTGR). Several novel compounds have been discovered with activity against SmTGR, cultured larval, and adult worms. These compounds may serve as starting points for the development of new therapeutic agents to combat schistosomiasis.

Methods

Reagents

Thioredoxin glutathione reductase (EC 1.8.1.B1) from S. mansoni (SmTGR) was produced at the laboratory of Dr. Wesley Van Voorhis (University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA) by methods described previously [8]. Naphthazarin, oxidized glutathione (GSSG), β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 2’-phosphate reduced tetrasodium salt hydrate (NADPH), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was the product of AMRESCO (Solon, OH, USA). ThioGlo® 1 Fluorescent Thiol Reagent was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

Endpoint SmTGR assay

SmTGR protein (1.58 μg/ml) was loaded into each well of black 384-well plates (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA, USA) containing 19 μl of assay buffer I (90 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, 100 μM NADPH, and 0.48 mg/ml BSA), followed by an addition of 1 μl positive control or test compounds. The plates were sealed and incubated for 50 min at room temperature. Then, 10 μl of assay buffer II (90 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, and 100 μM NADPH) supplemented with 150 μM GSSG was added to give a final volume of 30 μl per well. Following a 1 h incubation, the product was reacted with 30 μl ThioGlo® 1 reagent for 20–30 min, and the fluorescence signal was monitored at an excitation wavelength of 380 nm and an emission wavelength of 515 nm on the EnVision plate reader (PerkinElmer).

Compound library

The compound library comprising 59,360 synthetic compounds was provided by Novo Nordisk A/S (Bagsværd, Denmark). The structural diversity covers heterocycles, lactams, sulfonates, sulfonamides, amines, secondary amides, and natural product-derived compounds. The compounds were highly purified and the stock, pre-dissolved in 100 % dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution, was applied to the primary screening with an average final concentration of 10 μM for each compound.

High-throughput screening experiment

An HTS effort was carried out against the compound library described above. In each of the 384-well plates, 64 wells of the outer four columns were used as high-, mid-, and low-concentration of naphthazarin controls (final concentrations: 30 μM, 1.5 μM, and 0.5 μM, respectively) and negative control (3.3 % DMSO), each with 16 replicates. The test compounds were placed in the center columns 3–22. Both uninhibited (DMSO) and fully inhibited (30 μM naphthazarin) signals were assessed and the Z' factor was calculated according to the literature [14]. Taking 30 μM naphthazarin to represent 100 % inhibition, compounds showing greater than 90 % inhibition were considered as ‘hits’. All initial hits were rescreened and further studied for concentration-dependent response characteristics.

Studies with parasites

Cercariae were shed from infected Biomphalaria glabrata snails, obtained from the Biomedical Research Institute (Rockville, MD, USA), and mechanically transformed to schistosomula as described [15]. Approximately 300 freshly prepared schistosomula were placed in each well of a 24-well plate containing 1 ml Basch’s Complete Medium 169 (with the addition of 10 % fetal bovine serum) and incubated overnight at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 atmosphere. The following day, compounds were added to each well at the indicated concentrations and the parasites were observed for several days for dead (dark, granular appearance, and non-motile) or alive (translucent and motile) as described [16]. Adult parasites were obtained from female Swiss Webster mice seven weeks after infection by perfusion with RPMI Medium 1640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using standard methods [15]. Live worms were washed thoroughly with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and incubated in 5 ml Basch’s Complete Medium 169 [17] in 6-well tissue culture plates with ten worm pairs per well, and cultured overnight in 5 % CO2 at 37 °C. The following day, media were removed from each well and replaced with 5 ml of fresh media. Test compounds were dissolved in DMSO at 10 mM and added to the wells at the indicated concentrations. The same volume of DMSO was added to each well. Negative control worms were treated with an equal volume of DMSO alone. Each well was replaced with fresh media and compounds every 48 h. Worm mobility and survival were observed under a Zeiss Stemi 2000-C stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) for 10 sec per worm. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Rush University Medical Center (IACUC number 14–080; DHHS animal welfare assurance number A3120-01).

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism® software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Nonlinear regression analyses were performed to calculate IC50 values. Values presented are means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments. Percentage inhibition of SmTGR activity by hit compounds was calculated after defining the response to 30 μM naphthazarin as 100 % inhibition.

Results

Assay optimization and validation

Recombinant SmTGR was expressed and purified as previously described [8]. An earlier assay of the coupled activities of SmTGR and peroxiredoxin-2 [13] was adapted to study the activity of SmTGR alone, using the following principle: SmTGR converts NADPH and GSSG to NADP+ and reduced glutathione (GSH), and GSH production can be detected with ThioGlo®, a maleimide derivative of the naphthopyranone fluorophore which fluoresces upon reacting with free thiol groups such as those present in GSH. We performed the assay in 384-well plates with a reaction volume of 30 μl before addition of ThioGlo®. Final concentrations prior to ThioGlo® addition were 1 μg/ml SmTGR, 100 μM NADPH, and 50 μM GSSG in a buffer of 90 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, with 10 mM EDTA and 0.45 mg/ml BSA. After 60 min of room-temperature incubation, the reaction was stopped with 30 μl of 20 μM ThioGlo 1 (Covalent Associates, Corvallis, OR, USA). After ten additional minutes, samples were excited at 380 nM and read for fluorescence at 515 nM.

High-throughput screening parameters and execution

Under the above optimized assay conditions, we observed good dose responses to naphthazarin with an IC50 of 1.42 ± 0.08 μM (see Fig. 1a). This value is comparable to that documented in the literature (10 μM) [8]. Naphthazarin at 30 μM produced a full inhibition (100 %; background signal) of SmTGR in this assay (see Fig. 1b), whereas DMSO alone (served as a negative control) did not show any inhibition (0 %) on SmTGR activity (total signal). As a result, the coefficient of variation (CV) values were 3.40 % for total signal and 13.92 % for background signal, respectively. The Z' factor calculated is 0.859 with a signal-to-background ratio (S/B) of 46.76 (see Fig. 1b). These characteristics indicate that the assay system is of high quality and well suited to HTS [14]. Of the 59,360 samples initially screened, 928 hits (1.56 %) showed greater than 90 % inhibition on SmTGR activity (see Fig. 2). Secondary screening confirmed that 74 (0.12 %) of the above hits displayed consistent inhibitory effects on SmTGR with IC50 values ranging between 3 nM and 50 μM (see Table 1).
Fig. 1

Validation of the HTS assay. a Concentration-dependent inhibitory activity of naphthazarin on SmTGR under the optimized assay conditions, from which the IC50 value was calculated (n = 3, mean ± SEM). b Z' factor determination. Assays were performed under the optimized conditions and 160 replicates of total and background signals were studied. HTS assay parameters, including Z' factor and S/B were examined. Raw fluorescence units (Y-axis in the left) from each of the controls and % inhibition (Y-axis in the right) are shown. Dashed lines indicate means and mean ± 3 × standard deviation of the 160 data points

Fig. 2

Primary HTS experiment. A collection of 59,360 compounds were screened using the optimized endpoint SmTGR fluorescence assay at an average final concentration of 10 μM for each compound. Sixteen positive (30 μM naphthazarin) and negative (DMSO) control reactions were plated to calculate % inhibition. Dashed line indicates 90 % inhibition of the initial threshold for hits

Table 1

Structures of the confirmed hits and their inhibition of SmTGR and cidal activities against worms

Compound

Structure

IC50 (μM)a

Efficacy (%)a

Larvab(μM)

Adultc(μM)

WNN0724-H007

0.424 ± 0.106

98.57 ± 1.36

50

e

WNN0809-E009

3.848 ± 0.311

99.60 ± 0.26

n.a. d

WNN0256-E003

4.476 ± 0.905

98.99 ± 0.45

n.a.

WNN0434-C002

1.448 ± 0.141

98.48 ± 1.48

25

WNN1041-F010

3.181 ± 0.636

97.34 ± 3.30

n.a.

WNN0328-C003

5.362 ± 0.453

99.41 ± 0.09

n.a.

WNN0625-C003

2.981 ± 0.438

98.69 ± 1.42

n.a.

WNN1087-E003

13.21 ± 1.775

95.92 ± 0.12

n.a.

WNN0397-C010

0.862 ± 0.120

95.55 ± 2.02

3.125

n.a.

WNN0042-E008

1.614 ± 0.375

94.31 ± 1.53

n.a.

WNN0929-D011

0.957 ± 0.232

97.08 ± 1.53

50

WNN0929-D007

3.576 ± 0.417

97.86 ± 0.21

n.a.

WNN0464-C005

1.038 ± 0.198

98.23 ± 2.04

25

WNN0464-F002

1.667 ± 0.325

97.51 ± 0.75

12.5

WNN0474-E006

2.410 ± 0.438

97.22 ± 0.81

n.a.

WNN0366-E010

2.605 ± 0.544

73.26 ± 1.61

6.25

WNN0544-A007

5.595 ± 0.431

98.62 ± 1.50

n.a.

WNN0912-G011

6.633 ± 1.209

96.87 ± 2.64

n.a.

WNN0197-D004

3.152 ± 0.509

96.75 ± 0.68

3.125

5

WNN0429-D003

7.243 ± 0.530

98.57 ± 0.63

50

WNN0446-H009

6.290 ± 0.177

85.95 ± 2.33

50

WNN0194-D004

3.238 ± 0.481

98.65 ± 1.37

50

WNN0373-D002

3.352 ± 0.481

82.32 ± 1.51

6.25

WNN0464-C004

3.029 ± 0.410

95.73 ± 0.86

6.25

WNN0609-E009

7.662 ± 0.870

82.93 ± 1.20

3.125

n.a.

WNN0192-H003

4.900 ± 0.955

94.49 ± 1.31

n.a.

WNN0029-D010

7.919 ± 0.488

97.19 ± 0.74

n.a.

WNN0029-D009

11.89 ± 0.474

92.95 ± 0.40

n.a.

WNN0224-E010

11.62 ± 0.346

99.21 ± 0.21

50

WNN0113-H010

12.78 ± 0.841

92.49 ± 1.05

n.a.

WNN0113-H004

9.286 ± 0.622

77.86 ± 2.78

n.a.

WNN0113-H003

13.08 ± 0.643

74.21 ± 1.41

n.a.

WNN0009-G004

2.595 ± 0.233

98.03 ± 1.12

12.5

WNN0341-B004

6.076 ± 0.849

98.97 ± 0.87

n.a.

WNN0287-H004

3.257 ± 0.792

91.03 ± 0.45

25

WNN0189-G005

15.73 ± 1.351

77.53 ± 0.99

n.a.

WNN0621-C011

8.643 ± 0.912

78.09 ± 2.19

n.a.

WNN0367-F009

0.612 ± 0.057

98.35 ± 1.32

25

WNN0809-C005

17.63 ± 0.863

99.20 ± 0.62

6.25

WNN0009-H010

28.61 ± 1.131

96.77 ± 0.49

50

WNN0409-G007

3.548 ± 0.064

98.56 ± 1.56

n.a.

WNN0197-G002

5.438 ± 0.552

98.09 ± 1.56

3.125

10

WNN0009-A002

14.47 ± 0.990

82.47 ± 1.70

50

WNN0925-B011

1.352 ± 0.123

94.87 ± 0.19

n.a.

WNN0029-C005

0.003 ± 0.001

97.40 ± 1.50

12.5

WNN0726-A010

2.614 ± 0.262

98.70 ± 1.63

50

WNN0463-G011

7.171 ± 0.226

95.20 ± 2.54

n.a.

WNN0335-G006

13.05 ± 0.028

94.88 ± 1.48

12.5

WNN0961-C005

2.643 ± 0.276

95.77 ± 1.08

n.a.

WNN0374-G010

4.995 ± 0.290

72.99 ± 3.01

50

WNN0304-A007

2.886 ± 0.976

97.56 ± 2.98

50

WNN0826-B004

2.214 ± 0.799

93.88 ± 0.17

25

WNN0893-H007

5.019 ± 0.212

95.89 ± 1.26

n.a.

WNN0196-F005

6.719 ± 0.233

73.87 ± 0.93

50

WNN0493-F008

6.305 ± 0.523

78.85 ± 2.35

3.125

10

WNN0395-A008

7.871 ± 0.728

98.51 ± 1.39

n.a.

WNN1018-E008

11.98 ± 0.898

95.62 ± 2.29

n.a.

WNN1177-H006

0.831 ± 0.113

98.02 ± 1.44

n.a.

WNN0263-A002

16.14 ± 0.884

98.88 ± 0.79

6.25

WNN0035-G011

18.23 ± 1.591

96.60 ± 0.67

12.5

WNN1177-F009

1.576 ± 0.304

97.00 ± 1.41

n.a.

WNN0572-G004

2.119 ± 0.502

98.46 ± 1.61

50

WNN0493-H007

3.057 ± 0.495

98.71 ± 0.83

n.a.

WNN0826-A003

2.862 ± 0.163

97.36 ± 1.75

50

WNN0307-H007

7.348 ± 0.219

98.44 ± 0.80

50

WNN0045-G003

9.057 ± 1.117

98.78 ± 0.76

12.5

WNN0004-A011

0.004 ± 0.001

95.89 ± 4.91

50

WNN0058-C010

0.562 ± 0.071

77.47 ± 1.08

50

WNN0433-C010

1.938 ± 0.431

85.21 ± 2.02

n.a.

WNN0151-C005

3.286 ± 0.240

97.06 ± 1.17

n.a.

WNN0646-C002

14.78 ± 1.619

90.0 ± 1.379

12.5

WNN0040-H011

46.90 ± 5.544

96.74 ± 0.72

n.a.

WNN0341-C002

4.395 ± 0.403

90.48 ± 1.06

n.a.

WNN0826-A007

0.205 ± 0.148

98.36 ± 1.29

n.a.

aThe values shown are means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. bCompounds were tested against larval worms at 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, and 3.125 μM. The lowest concentration resulting in 100 % larval death at 48 hours is indicated. cCompounds were tested against adult worms at 10 and 5 μM. The lowest concentration resulting in 100 % worm death on day seven is indicated

dn.a.: no activity; e-: not tested

Bold phase indicates compounds in the same scaffold

The 74 confirmed hits can be divided into 17 scaffolds according to their different structure characteristics:

(1) 3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-1H-4,7-methanoisoindole-1,3(2H)-dione (e.g., WNN0256-E003) and 3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-1H-4,7-epoxyisoindole-1,3(2H)-dione (e.g., WNN0724-H007 and WNN0809-E009); (2) 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (e.g., WNN0434-C002, WNN1041-F010, WNN0328-C003, and WNN1087-E003) and its reductive product pyrrolidine-2,5-dione (e.g., WNN0625-C003); (3) 5-nitro-2-(phenylsulfonyl)pyridine (e.g., WNN0397-C010 and WNN0042-E008); (4) ((hydrazono)methyl)phenol (e.g., WNN0929-D011 and WNN0929-D007); (5) 5-(5-nitrothiazol-2-yl)thio)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ol (e.g., WNN0464-C005 and WNN0464-F002); (6) benzoquinone (e.g., WNN0474-E006, WNN0366-E010, WNN0544-A007, and WNN0912-G011); (7) 5-bromo-3,4-dinitrothiophen-2-amine (e.g., WNN0197-D004, WNN0429-D003, and WNN0446-H009) and thiophene derivatives (e.g., WNN0194-D004 and WNN0373-D002); (8) 3-thio-4H-1,2,4-triazole (e.g., WNN0464-C004 and WNN0609-E009) and 2,5-dithio-1,3,4-thiadiazole (e.g., WNN0192-H003); (9) 2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-naphtho[1,2-e][1,3]oxazine (e.g., WNN0029-D010 and WNN0029-D009); (10) benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (e.g., WNN0113-H010, WNN0113-H004, and WNN0113-H003) and its condensation product (e.g., WNN0224-E010); (11) multi-halogen substituted benzene or cyclohexane (e.g., WNN0009-G004, WNN0341-B004, and WNN0287-H004); (12) phenylsulfonyl (e.g., WNN0621-C011 and WNN0367-F009) or pyridinylsulfonyl derivative (e.g., WNN0189-G005); (13) 5-membered heterocycles substituted with nitro or methylsulfonyl group (e.g., WNN0809-C005, WNN0009-H010 and WNN0409-G007); (14) nitro substituted benzo[b]thiophene derivatives (WNN0197-G002, WNN0009-A002, and WNN0925-B011); (15) benzofuran (e.g., WNN0463-G011) and 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran (e.g., WNN0029-C005 and WNN0726-A010); (16) benzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole (e.g., WNN0335-G006 and WNN0961-C005); and (17) quinolin-2(1H)-one (e.g., WNN0374-G010 and WNN0304-A007).

A limited structure-activity relationship (SAR) could be inferred from some of the scaffolds: for instance, in scaffold (5) (WNN0464-C005 versus WNN0464-F002), N-substituent including cycloalkyl and alkyl chain had no obvious difference for TGR inhibition, with WNN0464-F002 exhibiting better worm-killing activity ex vivo; in scaffold (7) (WNN0197-D004 versus WNN0429-D003), substituents including ethyl and benzyl on the amino group also showed no obvious difference for TGR inhibition, however, WNN0197-D004 was active ex vivo. Among all these hits, furoxan (WNN0809-C005) and benzofuroxan (WNN0335-G006) were well-studied structural motifs as nitric oxide (NO) donating compounds capable of controlling schistosomiasis [11, 18]. The mechanism involved in this action includes nucleophilic attack by the sulfhydryl moiety of a cysteine residue or by selenocysteine at either three or four-position of the oxadiazole, and subsequent rearrangement to release the nitroxyl anion (NO). Further SAR analysis showed that the presence of electron withdrawing groups at three-position generally increased its capacity. Fruttero and co-workers reported that furoxans could inhibit the activity of P-glycoprotein, MRP1, and MRP3 (multidrug resistance-associated proteins) transporters in different types of cells, which were considered as potentially attractive targets for the development of new therapeutic agents against schistosomal infection [19].

Ex vivo activity against parasites

The 74 confirmed hits were screened against cultured, larval parasites at 50 μM (see Table 1). We found that 53 % (39/74) of the compounds had cidal activity at 48 h. They were subsequently tested against larva at 25, 12.5, 6.25, and 3.125 μM (see Table 1). Of them, five were found to kill 100 % of larva at 48 h at 3.125 μM (see Table 1). These five hits were further tested ex vivo against adult worms, with two killing adult worms at 10 μM (WNN0197-G002 and WNN0493-F008) and one killing adult worms at 5 μM (WNN0197-D004; see Table 1).

Discussion

To date, PZQ is the only drug used to treat the disease, and with its increased use the probability of developing resistance has grown significantly. Therefore, it is important to identify new drugs to replace PZQ or, preferably, to be used in combination with PZQ to prevent resistance from developing. It is known that S. mansoni survives in humans partly because of the existence of a set of antioxidant enzymes that continuously degrade reactive oxygen species produced by the host. A key element of this defense system is TGR, a parasite-specific enzyme combining the functions of three human counterparts: glutathione reductase, thioredoxin reductase, and glutaredoxin. Although a recent study reported that RNAi helped validate novel and putative drug targets for schistosomiasis [20], TGR remains an attractive one and has been subject to HTS studies using different assay systems [13, 21]. In this study, we used recombinant SmTGR and adapted a novel coupled assay to measure TGR activity alone, which in turn was optimized for HTS [14]. This validation process was successful as demonstrated by a comparable IC50 value measured for the positive control, naphthazarin (see Fig. 1a), and other high quality assay parameters such as CV, Z' factor, and S/B (see Fig. 1b).

In the primary screening, a total of 59,360 synthetic compounds were screened and 928 initial hits were identified (1.56 %) using 90 % inhibition on SmTGR activity as a cut-off point. The initial hits were further characterized in dose–response experiments, of which 74 compounds displayed consistent inhibitory properties. When assessed for ex vivo activity against parasites, 39 hits showed cidal effects in 48 h, and five of them displayed 100 % killing at 3.125 μM; of these, two killed adult worms at 10 μM (WNN0197-G002 and WNN0493-F008) and one at 5 μM (WNN0197-D004), respectively. The bioactivity data shown in Table 1 indicate that there is no real trend or relationship between TGR inhibition and worm-killing activity. This phenomenon is not surprising as drug uptake by worms is usually the limiting factor in compound activity. In previous studies, most worm-killing activity was seen only at high nanomolar or low micromolar concentrations, e.g., 0.3–1 μM for PZQ [22]. This may be due to slow metabolism of worms cultured ex vivo, low compound uptake by worms, or many other factors. Three confirmed hits (WNN0197-G002, WNN0493-F008, and WNN0197-D004) were more active against worms than against TGR suggesting they hit other targets. TGR inhibitors are frequently electrophiles [10] and some of the more potent TGR inhibitors identified in this study have strong electrophilic centers (e.g., nitro, sulfonyl, methylsulfonyl, etc.), and might react with thiols and/or other components in the media thereby reducing their ability to kill worms.

Conclusion

Clearly, use of TGR as a molecular target to identify chemical compounds with inhibitory property is a viable approach in the development of therapeutic agents against schistosomiasis. The HTS system optimized in this study is both robust and easy to perform; it provides an alternative to other screening assays such as NADPH fluorescence [13] and DTNB (5,5’ dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) reduction [21] focusing on this enzyme. Identification of hits with structures similar to those previously shown to kill the parasite further supports the assay validity. Of the 74 hits discovered, the large variety of scaffolds offers adequate chemical space for lead generation and other follow-up investigations, though some of them may represent false positives that require secondary verification of their functionality. In this regard, the present study will certainly attract attention from scientists who are engaged in schistosomiasis research.

Abbreviations

BSA: 

Bovine serum albumin

CV: 

Coefficient of variation

DMSO: 

Dimethyl sulfoxide

EDTA: 

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

GSH: 

Reduced glutathione

GSSG: 

Oxidized glutathione

HTS: 

High-throughput screening

NADPH: 

β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 2'-phosphate reduced tetrasodium salt hydrate

MRP: 

Multidrug resistance-associated protein

PZQ: 

Praziquantel

SAR: 

Structure-activity relationship

S/B: 

Signal-to-background ratio

SEM: 

Standard error of the mean

SmTGR: 

Schistosoma mansoni thioredoxin glutathione reductase

TGR: 

Thioredoxin glutathione reductase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Zhiyun Zhang for technical assistance. This work was partially supported by grants from the World Health Organization’s Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (WHO/TDR A80553), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (to MWW: 2014DFA31130), the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China (to MWW: 2012ZX09304-011, 2013ZX09401003-005, 2013ZX09507-001 and 2013ZX09507-002), the Shanghai Science and Technology Development Fund (to MWW: 13DZ2290300 and 15DZ2291600), and the Thousand Talents Program in China (to MWW). Schistosome-infected mice and snails were provided by the NIAID Schistosomiasis Resource Center at the Biomedical Research Institute (BEI) (Rockville, MD, USA) through NIH-NIAID Contract HHSN272201000005I for distribution through BEI Resources. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The National Center for Drug Screening, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(2)
Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Rush University Medical Center
(3)
Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington

References

  1. King CH, Dangerfield-Cha M. The unacknowledged impact of chronic schistosomiasis. Chronic Illn. 2008;4(1):65–79. doi:10.1177/1742395307084407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hotez PJ, Engels D, Fenwick A, Savioli L. Africa is desperate for praziquantel. Lancet. 2010;376(9740):496–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60879-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hotez PJ, Fenwick A. Schistosomiasis in Africa: an emerging tragedy in our new global health decade. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(9), e485. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000485.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Domling A, Khoury K. Praziquantel and schistosomiasis. ChemMedChem. 2010;5(9):1420–34. doi:10.1002/cmdc.201000202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cioli D, Basso A, Valle C, Pica-Mattoccia L. Decades down the line: the viability of praziquantel for future schistosomiasis treatment. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2012;10(8):835–7. doi:10.1586/eri.12.70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang HH, Rigouin C, Williams DL. The redox biology of schistosome parasites and applications for drug development. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(24):3595–611.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sayed AA, Cook SK, Williams DL. Redox balance mechanisms in Schistosoma mansoni rely on peroxiredoxins and albumin and implicate peroxiredoxins as novel drug targets. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(25):17001–10. doi:10.1074/jbc.M512601200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuntz AN, Davioud-Charvet E, Sayed AA, Califf LL, Dessolin J, Arner ES, et al. Thioredoxin glutathione reductase from Schistosoma mansoni: an essential parasite enzyme and a key drug target. PLoS Med. 2007;4(6):e206. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040206.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Alger HM, Williams DL. The disulfide redox system of Schistosoma mansoni and the importance of a multifunctional enzyme, thioredoxin glutathione reductase. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2002;121(1):129–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ross F, Hernandez P, Porcal W, Lopez GV, Cerecetto H, Gonzalez M, et al. Identification of thioredoxin glutathione reductase inhibitors that kill cestode and trematode parasites. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35033. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035033.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rai G, Sayed AA, Lea WA, Luecke HF, Chakrapani H, Prast-Nielsen S, et al. Structure mechanism insights and the role of nitric oxide donation guide the development of oxadiazole-2-oxides as therapeutic agents against Schistosomiasis. J Med Chem. 2009;52(20):6474–83. doi:10.1021/Jm901021k.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sayed AA, Simeonov A, Thomas CJ, Inglese J, Austin CP, Williams DL. Identification of oxadiazoles as new drug leads for the control of schistosomiasis. Nat Med. 2008;14(4):407–12. doi:10.1038/nm1737.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Simeonov A, Jadhav A, Sayed AA, Wang Y, Nelson ME, Thomas CJ, et al. Quantitative high-throughput screen identifies inhibitors of the Schistosoma mansoni redox cascade. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(1):e127. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000127.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang JH, Chung TD, Oldenburg KR. A Simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high-throughput screening assays. J Biomol Screen. 1999;4(2):67–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tucker MS, Karunaratne LB, Lewis FA, Freitas TC, Liang YS. Schistosomiasis. Current Protocols in Immunology edited by John E Coligan et al. 2013;103: Unit 19 1. doi:10.1002/0471142735.im1901s103.
  16. Stefanic S, Dvorak J, Horn M, Braschi S, Sojka D, Ruelas DS, et al. RNA interference in Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula: selectivity, sensitivity and operation for larger-scale screening. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(10):e850. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000850.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Basch PF. Cultivation of Schistosoma mansoni in vitro. I. Establishment of cultures from cercariae and development until pairing. J Parasitol. 1981;67(2):179–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gasco A, Fruttero R, Sorba G, Di Stilo A, Calvino R. NO donors: Focus on furoxan derivatives. Pure Appl Chem. 2004;76(5):973–81. doi:10.1351/pac200476050973.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fruttero R, Crosetti M, Chegaev K, Guglielmo S, Gasco A, Berardi F, et al. Phenylsulfonylfuroxans as modulators of multidrug-resistance-associated protein-1 and P-glycoprotein. J Med Chem. 2010;53(15):5467–75. doi:10.1021/Jm100066y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Guidi A, Mansour NR, Paveley RA, Carruthers IM, Besnard J, Hopkins AL, et al. Application of RNAi to genomic drug target validation in Schistosomes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(5):e0003801. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003801.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lea WA, Jadhav A, Rai G, Sayed AA, Cass CL, Inglese J, et al. A 1,536-well-based kinetic HTS assay for inhibitors of Schistosoma mansoni thioredoxin glutathione reductase. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2008;6(4):551–5. doi:10.1089/adt.2008.149.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Andrews P. A summary of the efficacy of praziquantel against schistosomes in animal experiments and notes on its mode of action. Arzneimittelforschung. 1981;31(3a):538–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al. 2015

Advertisement