Open Access

Detection of reassortant avian influenza A (H11N9) virus in environmental samples from live poultry markets in China

  • Ye Zhang1,
  • Shu-Mei Zou1,
  • Xiao-Dan Li1,
  • Li-Bo Dong1,
  • Hong Bo1,
  • Rong-Bao Gao1,
  • Da-Yan Wang1 and
  • Yue-Long Shu1, 2Email author
Infectious Diseases of Poverty20165:59

DOI: 10.1186/s40249-016-0149-2

Received: 9 November 2015

Accepted: 18 May 2016

Published: 8 June 2016

Abstract

Background

Avian influenza viruses have caused human infection and posed the pandemic potential. Live poultry markets are considered as a source of human infection with avian influenza viruses. Avian influenza routine surveillance of live poultry markets is taken annually in China. We isolated the 2 H11N9 influenza virus from the surveillance program. To better understand the risk caused by these new viruses, we characterize the genetic and pathogenicity of the two viruses.

Methods

Viral isolation was conducted with specific pathogen-free (SPF) embryonated chicken eggs. Whole genome was sequenced, and phylogenetic analysis was conducted.

Results

Two H11N9 viruses were identified, with all 8 segments belonging to the Eurasian lineage. The HA, NA, M, NS and PA genes were similar to virus isolates from ducks, and the NP, PB2 and PB1 gene segments were most similar to those viruses from wild birds, indicating that the H11N9 viruses might represent reassortant viruses from poultry and wild birds. The HA receptor binding preference was avian-like, and the cleavage site sequence of HA showed low pathogenic. The NA gene showed 94.6 % identity with the novel H7N9 virus that emerged in 2013. There was no drug resistance mutation in the M2 protein. The Asn30Asp and Thr215Ala substitutions in the M1 protein implied a potentially increased pathogenicity in mice. Both viruses were low-pathogenic strains, as assessed by the standards of intravenous pathogenicity index (IVPI) tests.

Conclusion

Two reassortant H11N9 avian influenza viruses were detected. These viruses showed low pathogenicity to chickens in the IVPI test. Public health concern caused by the reassortant H11N9 viruses should be emphasized during the future surveillance.

Keywords

Avian influenza H11N9 Genetic characterization Reassortant

Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file 1 for translations of the abstract into the six official working languages of the United Nations

Background

Wild waterfowl are considered to be the natural reservoir of influenza A virus. There are currently 16 HA subtypes (H1-H16) and nine NA subtypes (N1-N9) circulating in birds [1], and the H17N10 and H18N11 subtypes have been detected in bats [2]. The 16 avian HA subtypes have been detected in North America and Europe; among them, H4, H6 and H9 are the most common subtypes, followed by H3, H7, H11 and H5 in birds and poultry [3, 4]. By 2008, at least nine avian influenza HA subtypes and six NA subtypes had been reported in domestic ducks in eastern China [5].

Since 1900, H1, H2 and H3-subtype influenza A viruses have infected humans and have circulated within the human population. The first human infection with a highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus occurred in Hong Kong in 1997 [6]. Subsequently, human infections with other subtypes, such as H9N2, H7N2 and H7N3, were occasionally reported. In 2013, human infection with novel influenza A (H7N9) virus was first identified in China [7]. Subsequently, the first human infections with an H6N1 virus and an H10N8 virus were reported in Taiwan and Jiangxi, China, respectively [8, 9].

Epidemiological investigation has shown that live poultry markets (LPMs) are important sources of human infection with avian influenza viruses [10]. Avian influenza viruses can be detected in poultry as well as in environmental samples from LPMs [11]. The contaminated environments may provide continual sources to the new coming batches of poultry.

Since 2009, we have undertaken a nationwide surveillance program to monitor avian influenza viruses in poultry-related environmental samples. In this study, we isolated two reassortant H11N9 viruses from an LPM in Jiangxi province during routine surveillance in 2009. Genetic and molecular evolutionary analyses indicate that they are low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses. To our knowledge, this is the first report to identify a reassortant avian H11N9 virus in environmental samples from an LPM.

Methods

Sample collection

Our nationwide routine avian influenza virus surveillance of environmental samples has been conducted in China since January 2009. The samples, including bird feces, drinking or contaminated water, and environmental swabs, were collected monthly from LPMs, slaughterhouses and farms. From January 2009 to December 2013, 33 049 samples were collected from 142 cities in 31 provinces. The samples were placed into 15 mL tubes containing viral transport medium and sent to the laboratory for further testing. The viral transport medium consisted of 4 mL of minimum essential medium containing 0.5 % BSA, 10 % glycerol, 2 × 106 U/L penicillin G, 200 mg/L streptomycin, 2 × 106 U/L polymyxin B sulfate, 250 mg/L gentamicin, 60 mg/L ofloxacin-HCl, 0.2 g/L sulfamethoxazole and 5 × 105 U/L nystatin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).

RNA extraction and real-time PCR

An RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA) was used to extract viral RNA from the samples. Influenza A virus RNA was detected by real-time PCR (AgPath; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) targeting a matrix gene on a Stratagene Mx3005P thermocycler. The real-time RT-PCR amplification protocol included steps of 45 °C for 10 min and 95 °C for 10 min and then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 45 s.

Viral isolation

Virus-positive samples were shipped to the Chinese National Influenza Center for viral isolation. The samples were inoculated into the allantoic cavities of 9-day-old embryonated chicken eggs that were then incubated at 37 °C for 48 h before being chilled at 4 °C overnight. The allantoic fluid was harvested, and virus identification was performed with a hemagglutination assay with 0.5 % turkey red blood cells.

Gene sequencing

Eight gene segments of each virus were amplified with a One-Step RT-PCR kit (QIAGEN, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Complete genome amplification was performed using specific primers [12]. PCR products were purified with a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequencing was performed using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit on an ABI PRISM 3700 xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Phylogenetic analysis

Sequences were assembled and edited with Lasergene 8.1 (DNASTAR). Neighbor-joining (NJ) trees were constructed using MEGA 5.0. The bootstrap value was tested with 1000 replications for each gene segment. Homology analyses of nucleic acids and amino acids were performed on the NCBI website with BLAST. All of the reference sequences used in the phylogenetic comparison were obtained from GenBank.

IVPI test

Fresh infective allantoic fluid with a HA titer > 16 was diluted 1:10 in sterile isotonic saline. A sample (0.1 ml) of the diluted virus was injected intravenously into each of 10 6-week-old SPF chickens. All of the chickens were examined daily for 10 days and scored based on the condition of each chicken: 0 (normal), 1 (sick), 2 (severely sick) and 3 (dead), as described in the OIE/WHO guidelines [13].

Results

Molecular detection, viral isolation and subtype identification

The proportion of influenza M gene-positive environmental samples was 7.9 %, and the positive viral isolation rate was 1.5 %. The H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, H9 and H11 subtypes were detected between year 2009 and 2013. Among all of the viral isolates, 2 H11N9 avian influenza viruses were separately isolated from two LPMs in Wuning city, Jiangxi province. Both viruses were isolated in 2009 and were named A/environment/Jiangxi/26/2009(H11N9) (JX/26/2009) and A/environment/Jiangxi/28/2009(H11N9) (JX/28/2009). JX/26/2009 was collected from Xinning LPM on July 8, 2009, and JX/28/2009 was isolated from Guai LPM on July 8, 2009. The complete genome sequences of the influenza viruses have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KC881287 to KC881302.

Homology comparison

JX/26/2009 and JX/28/2009 were highly homologous, with greater than 99 % identity in the nucleotide sequences of each segment. The lengths of the PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NA, NP, M and NS genes were 2341, 2341, 2233, 1754, 1453, 1565, 1027 and 890 bp, respectively. The HA gene showed the highest identity (99 %) with the Eurasian A/duck/Chiba/11/2007(H11N9) virus, whereas the NA gene sequence showed 99 % identity with the Eurasian A/duck/Vietnam/G30/2008(H11N9) virus. The NA genes of the viruses were 94.6 % identical to A/Anhui/1/2013(H7N9), the novel A(H7N9) virus identified in March 2013 in China. The nucleotide sequences of the internal genes showed high similarity with other avian influenza viruses from wild birds or ducks. The viruses in GenBank that had the highest amino-acid sequence homology to our newly identified viruses are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Comparisons of A/Environment/Jiangxi/26/2009(H11N9) with Isolates in GenBank with highest nucleotide and amino acid identity

Gene segment

Virus with the highest nucleic acid homology

Percent homology (%)

GenBank ID

PB2

A/velvet A/scoter/Mongolia/883 V/2009(H4N6)

99

KC986346.1

PB1

A/mallard/Korea/GH170/2007(H7N7)

99

FJ750870.1

PA

A/duck/Jiangxi/25186/2009(H7N6)

98

KF260253.1

HA

A/duck/Chiba/11/2007(H11N9)

99

AB669139.1

NP

A/northern pintail/Hong Kong/MPC2085/2007(H11N9)

98

KF259789.1

NA

A/duck/Vietnam/G30/2008(H11N9)

99

AB593465.1

M

A/duck/Jiangxi/16326/2010(H7N7)

99

KF259249.1

NS1

A/duck/Nanjing/1102/2010(H4N6)

99

KC683707.1

Phylogenetic analysis

The results of a phylogenetic analysis showed that the eight gene segments of the 2 H11N9 viruses isolated in this study all belonged to the Eurasian lineage, which was distinct from the branch of North American lineages in the tree (Fig. 1). The HA genes were closely related to A/duck/Chiba/11/2007(H11N9), whereas their NA genes were in a separate subgroup from the A(H7N9) influenza virus.
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic analysis of the A/Environment/Jiangxi/26/2009 and A/Environment/Jiangxi/28/2009 viruses. A/Environment/Jiangxi/26/2009 and A/Environment/Jiangxi/28/2009 are indicated by bold type. Numbers below nodes represent bootstrap values from 1000 replicates

The PB2, PB1, PA, NP, M and NS genes clustered with A/Velvet scoter/883 V/2009(H4N6), A/Mallard/Korea/GH171/2007(H7N9), A/Duck/Jiangxi/25186/2009(H7N6), A/Wild duck/Korea/CSM20-5/2009(H4N6), A/Duck/Jiangxi/26326/2010(H7N7) and A/Duck/Nanjing/1102/2010(H4N8), respectively.

Molecular analysis

The HA cleavage sites of the 2 H11N9 viruses were AIASR/G, which is characteristic of low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses. The Q226 residue of HA indicated that the receptor binding sites still recognize the α-2, 3 receptor (in H3 numbering). The mammalian-adaptation mutations of PB2 (627 K and 701 N) were not found in either of the viruses, indicating that the viruses originated from an avian source.

The N30D and T215A substitutions in the M1 protein, which have been associated with increased H5N1 pathogenicity in mice [14], were found in JX/26/2009 and JX/28/2009. No adamantine-resistance or neuraminidase drug-resistance mutations were detected in the M2 or NA proteins, respectively. The main amino acid mutations are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Key amino acid residues analysis of A/environment/Jiangxi/26/2009(H11N9) and A/environment/Jiangxi/28/2009(H11N9)

Protein

Mutation

Function

JX/26/2009 and JX/28/2009

HA

Q226L

Receptor biding site. Q is the avian signature.

Q

PB2

E627K

Enhances pathogenicity in mice

E

D701N

D

M1

N30D

increase the virulence of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in mice

D

T215A

A

M2

S31N

resist to amantadine

S

 

H274Y

 

H

NA

E119V

resist to oseltamivir or zanamivir

E

 

R152K

 

R

IVPI test

The IVPI scores were calculated according to the OIE/WHO guidelines [13]. The IVPI scores of JX/26/2009 and JX/28/2009 were 0.43 and 0.6, respectively, indicating that these 2 H11N9 viruses are low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses.

Discussion

H11N9 has been reported in wild waterfowl in Brazil, Belgium, the Republic of Kazakhstan, and Japan [1519]. This subtype virus has also been isolated from ducks in southern China and Hong Kong SAR [20].

From 2009 to 2013, two H11N9 avian influenza viruses were isolated during routine surveillance. The samples were collected from chicken cages in LPMs. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that all the gene segments belonged to the Eurasian lineage. The HA, NA and NP genes originated from H11N9 viruses, whereas the internal gene segments clustered with H7N7, H7N6 and H4N6. The Eurasian-lineage HA gene clusters with recently reported H11N9 viruses that have been found in wild birds or ducks (Fig. 1). H11N9 viruses have been identified as the donors of the NA gene of H7N9 virus in the 2013 [21]. The NA phylogenetic trees showed that the two H11N9 viruses in this study were in the Eurasian lineage together with NA of the H7N9 viruses, though they were in a separate subgroup from the H7N9 viruses. The HA, NA, M and NS genes of the two strains of H11N9 viruses were derived from domestic ducks, whereas the polymerase and NP genes were derived from wild birds. It has been suggested that shared water sources between waterfowl and poultry may enhance the possibility of reassortant avian influenza virus occurrence [22]. Indeed, the H11N9 viruses in our report were collected in water-rich areas in Jiangxi province. We hypothesize that the virus originated via the occasional reassortment of viral gene segments from wild birds, waterfowl and poultry. Recently, an H11N9 virus has been isolated from a domestic duck in LPMs in eastern China; this virus obtained its genes from H11, H3, H10 and H7 avian influenza viruses from ducks in Chinese LPMs [23]. Because LPMs provide favourable conditions for the reassortment of avian influenza viruses, this is important to strengthen the surveillance in LPMs to monitor the distribution and genetic variation of avian influenza viruses.

Among influenza A viruses, H5 and H7 are considered to be notable avian influenza viruses, but not all H5 and H7 viruses display high pathogenic. Low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses can be precursors of highly pathogenic viruses [24, 25]. The two H11N9 viruses in this study are low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses. Their receptor binding sites retained an avian virus-like character. The N30D and T215A mutations observed in the M1 protein might increase the pathogenicity of these viruses in mice.

Reassortment among different influenza viruses is considered to be the main mechanism for the generation of new viruses, which may bear enhanced mammalian transmission and pandemic potential. It has been reported that H11N9 viruses can be transmitted directly to hunters from ducks [26]. New H11-subtype viruses have also been isolated from penguins [27]. Therefore, influenza virus subtypes other than the dominant H5, H7 and H9 subtypes should be emphasized. Continual monitoring is especially important for reassortant viruses, which may possess new characteristics that have implications for public health.

Conclusion

Two H11N9 influenza viruses were isolated from the live poultry markets in Jiangxi during the routine surveillance. All the segments of the viruses were belonging to the Eurasian lineage of influenza virus genes. The segments of the viruses are originated from both poultry and wild birds. The character of the genes origination highlights the important of Jiangxi province as the possible hot place of mixture the influenza viruses from both migratory wild birds and poultry. The NA genes of the two viruses are different from the novel H7N9 virus of 2013. The Both viruses were low-pathogenic strains from the IVPI tests and the molecular genes markers. The reassortant virus may possess new characteristics that may be of concern to public health, and continuous surveillance should be emphasized.

Abbreviations

IVPI, intravenous pathogenicity index; LPM, live poultry market; r RT-PCR, real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; SPF, specific pathogen free

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Jiangxi Provincial Influenza Surveillance Laboratory for assistance with collection of environmental-monitoring samples. We also thank the National Basic Research Grant (973) Plan for financially supporting this research.

Authors’ contributions

YZ sequenced the whole genomes of the 2 strains of H11N9, performed sequence alignments and drafted the manuscript. Viral isolation was performed by SMZ. XDL and HB detected viral nucleic acids. LBD aligned all of the sequences. RBG designed and participated in the study. DYW and YLS designed the study and revised the manuscript. All of the authors approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Grant information

This research was supported by National Basic Research Grant (973) 2011CB504704.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(2)
Key Laboratory for Medical Virology, National Health and Family Planning Commission

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Types of Influenza Viruses. 2016. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/viruses/types.htm.Google Scholar
  2. Tong S, Zhu X, Li Y, Shi M, Zhang J, Bourgeois M, et al. New World Bats Harbor Diverse Influenza A Viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(10):e100365.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Olsen B, Munster VJ, Wallensten A, Waldenström J, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Global patterns of influenza a virus in wild birds. Science. 2006;312(5772):384–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Munster VJ, Baas C, Lexmond P, Waldenstrom J, Wallensten A, et al. Spatial, Temporal, and Species Variationin Prevalence of Influenza A Viruses in Wild Migratory Birds. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3(5):e61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Qiu B, Liu W, Peng D, Hu S, Liu X. Distribution of avian influenza virus subtypes among domestic ducks in eastern China. Acta Microbiologica Sinica. 2008;48(10):1290–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ungchusak K, Auewarakul P, Dowell SF, Kitphati R, Auwanit W, Puthavathana P, et al. Probable person-to-person transmission of avian influenza A (H5N1). N Engl J Med. 2005;352:333–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao R, Cao B, Hu Y, Feng Z, Wang D, Hu W, et al. Severe Human Infections with a Novel Reassortant Avian-Origin Influenza A (H7N9) Virus. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(20):1888–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shi W, Shi Y, Wu Y, Liu D, Gao GF. Origin and molecular characterization of the human-infecting H6N1 influenza virus in Taiwan. Protein Cell. 2013;4(11):846–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen H, Yuan H, Gao R, Zhang J, Wang D, Xiong Y, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of a fatal case of avian influenza A H10N8 virus infection : a descriptive study. Lancet. 2014;383(9918):714–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wan XF, Dong L, Lan Y, Long LP, Xu C, Zou S, et al. Indications that Live Poultry Markets are a Major Source of Human H5N1 Influenza Virus Infection in China. J Virol. 2011;85:13432–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Jadhao SJ, Nguyen DC, Uyeki TM, Shaw M, Maines T, Rowe T, et al. Genetic analysis of avian influenza A viruses isolated from domestic waterfowl in live-bird markets of Hanoi, Vietnam, preceding fatal H5N1 human infections in 2004. Arch Virol. 2009;154:1249–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoffimann E, Stech J, Guan Y, Webster RG, Perez DR. Universal primer set for the full-length amplication of all influenza A viryses. Arch Virol. 2001;146:2275–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. OIE manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals 2016. http://www.oie.int/international-standard-setting/terrestrial-manual/access-online/.
  14. Shufang F, Guohua D, Jiasheng S, Guobin T, Yongbing S, Yongping J, et al. Two amino acid residues in the matrix protein M1 contribute to the virulence difference of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in mice. Virology. 2009;384(1):28–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Van Borm S, Rosseel T, Vangeluwe D, Vandenbussche F, Van den Berg T, Lambrecht B. Phylogeographic analysis of avian influenza viruses isolated from Charadriiformes in Belgium confirms intercontinental reassortment in gulls. Arch Virol. 2012;157(8):1509–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Me Araujo J, De Azevedo Jr SM, Gaidet N, Hurtado RF, Walker D, Thomazelli LM, et al. Avian Influenza Virus (H11N9) in Migratory ShorebirdsWintering in the Amazon Region, Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110141.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Pawar S, Chakrabarti A, Cherian S, Pande S, Nanaware M, Raut S, et al. An avian influenza A(H11N1) virus from a wild aquatic bird revealing a unique Eurasian-American genetic reassortment. Virus Genes. 2010;41:14–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Jahangir A, Watanabe Y, Chinen O, Yamazaki S, Sakai K, Okamura M, et al. Surveillance of avian influenza viruses in Northern pintails (Anasacuta) in Tohoku District. Japan Avian Dis. 2008;52:49–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Karamendin K, Kydyrmanov A, Zhumatov K, Asanova S, Ishmukhametova N, Sayatov M. Phylogenetic analysis of avian influenza viruses of H11 subtypeisolated in Kazakhstan. Virus Genes. 2011;43(1):46–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tan D, Huang JL, Wang CHJ, He SH, Wanag WG, Tang XM, et al. Genetic analysis and pathogenicity of 2 H11N9 subtype avian influenza isolates from duck. Prog Vet Med. 2005;36(2):25–8.Google Scholar
  21. Lam TT, Wang J, Shen Y, Zhou B, Duan L, Cheung CL, et al. The genesis and source of the H7N9 influenza viruses causing human infections in China. Nature. 2013;502(7470):241–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lang AS, Kelly A, Runstadler JA. Prevalence and diversity of avian.influenza viruses in environmental reservoirs. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:509–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wu H, Peng X, Peng X, Nanping W. Molecular characterization of areassortant H11N9 subtype avian influenza virus isolated from a domestic duck in Eastern China. Arch Virol. 2015;160:2595-2601.
  24. Alexander DJ. A review of avian influenza in different bird species. Vet Microbiol. 2000;74:3–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Alexander DJ. An overview of the epidemiology of avian influenza. Vaccine. 2007;25:5637–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gill JS, Webby R, Gilchrist MJ, Gray GC. Avian influenza among Waterfowl hunters and wildlife professionals. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1284–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Hurt AC, Vijaykrishna D, Butle J, et al. Detection of Evolutionarily Distinct Avian Influenza A Viruses in Antarctica. Mbio. 2014;5(3):e01098–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016