Skip to main content

Table 4 Relationship between patients characteristics and rate of catastrophic expenditures for TB, China 2012

From: Factors that determine catastrophic expenditure for tuberculosis care: a patient survey in China

Variable

Rate of Ia (n = 747)

Rate of II (n = 728)b

 

n (%)

Χ2

P

n (%)

Χ2

P

Age(years)

 

23.07

0.000

 

27.66

0.000

 ≤40

56(48.7)

  

43(38.7)

  

 41–59

191(66.6)

  

139(49.3)

  

 ≥60

252(73.0)

  

216(64.5)

  

Gender

 

1.14

0.286

 

0.28

0.600

 Male

382(67.9)

  

296(54.1)

  

 Female

117(63.6)

  

102(56.4)

  

Type of TB case

 

3.39

0.066

 

0.60

0.437

 New or never treated

390(65.2)

  

314(54.0)

  

 Relapse or previously treated

109(73.2)

  

84(57.5)

  

Residence

 

5.06

0.025

 

0.36

0.549

 Rural

468(67.9)

  

369(55.0)

  

 Urban

31(53.4)

  

29(50.9)

  

Education

 

12.90

0.005

 

14.31

0.003

 None

108(75.0)

  

84(61.3)

  

 Primary school

175(70.9)

  

149(61.3)

  

 Junior school

161(61.9)

  

122(48.0)

  

 Senior school or above

55(57.3)

  

43(45.7)

  

Marital status

 

3.58

0.167

 

4.46

0.108

 Single

399(66.3)

  

319(54.1)

  

 Married

31(59.6)

  

23(46.0)

  

 Bereft of spousec

69(74.2)

  

56(63.6)

  

Employment status

 

26.77

0.000

 

30.37

0.000

 Unemployment

40(81.6)

  

31(64.6)

  

 Employment

235(58.8)

  

177(45.3)

  

 Retired

193(74.2)

  

167(66.3)

  

 Losing work abilities

31(81.6)

  

23(62.2)

  

Health insuranced

 

8.03

0.045

 

3.02

0.389

 MIUE

24(49.0)

  

22(44.9)

  

 NMCS

453(68.2)

  

361(55.8)

  

 MIUR

15(68.2)

  

10(47.6)

  

 Self-paye

7(58.3)

  

5(45.5)

  

Household size

 

46.13

0.000

 

25.82

0.000

 <4

360(75.6)

  

287(61.7)

  

 ≥8

139(51.3)

  

111(42.2)

  

As % of household incomef

 

16.99

0.000

 

4.08

0.043

 <50 %

230(59.9)

  

191(50.9)

  

 ≥50 %

269(74.1)

  

205(58.4)

  

Minimum living security householdg

15.66

0.000

 

1.56

0.212

 Yes 93(83.0)

  

65(60.2)

  

 No 406(63.9)

  

333(53.7)

  

In-patient service

81.36

0.000

 

50.28

0.000

 Yes 331(80.9)

  

265(66.6)

  

 No 168(49.7)

  

133(40.3)

  
  1. Note: The bold values indicate statistical significance at 5 % level. a: I >10 % of household income, II ≥ 40 % of capacity to pay (non-food expenditure)
  2. b: Of the 747 participants,19 missed household or non-food expenditure data
  3. c: 17 divorced participants were categorized into the group “Bereft of spouse”
  4. d: MIUE: Medical Insurance for Urban Employees Scheme
  5. NCMS New Cooperative Medical Scheme
  6. MIUR Medical Insurance for Urban Residents Scheme
  7. e: 3 participants covered by commercial insurance were categorized into the group of “self-pay”
  8. f: It means patient annual income as % of annual household income in 2012
  9. g: Minimum living security households were authorized by the local civil affairs department if annual income per person was lower than the minimum living standard