Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary outcomes from the choice experiment

From: Household perceptions and subjective valuations of indoor residual spraying programmes to control malaria in northern Uganda

  Frequency 95 % Confidence Interval
IRS alternative selecteda 82 % (81 %–87 %)
 using DDT 42 % (39 %–46 %)
 using lambda-cyhalothrin (ICON) 40 % (38 %–44 %)
Always selectedb   
 Money alternative 8 % (6 %–11 %)
 IRS alternative 74 % (70 %–78 %)
 DDT alternative 13 % (9 %–16 %)
 ICON alternative 10 % (7 %–13 %)
 Lowest malaria risk alternative 31 % (26 %–35 %)
  1. Notes: Sampling weights applied to account for cluster sampling. a Percentage of choice tasks in sample (3 per respondent). b Percentage of survey respondents exhibiting one of the listed behavioural patterns