Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary outcomes from the choice experiment

From: Household perceptions and subjective valuations of indoor residual spraying programmes to control malaria in northern Uganda

 

Frequency

95 % Confidence Interval

IRS alternative selecteda

82 %

(81 %–87 %)

 using DDT

42 %

(39 %–46 %)

 using lambda-cyhalothrin (ICON)

40 %

(38 %–44 %)

Always selectedb

  

 Money alternative

8 %

(6 %–11 %)

 IRS alternative

74 %

(70 %–78 %)

 DDT alternative

13 %

(9 %–16 %)

 ICON alternative

10 %

(7 %–13 %)

 Lowest malaria risk alternative

31 %

(26 %–35 %)

  1. Notes: Sampling weights applied to account for cluster sampling. a Percentage of choice tasks in sample (3 per respondent). b Percentage of survey respondents exhibiting one of the listed behavioural patterns