Skip to main content

Table 3 The performance of the pLDH ELISA, malaria antibody ELISA, and the RDT for the detection of malaria parasites, as compared with the microscopic method (GM)

From: Comparative evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, an antibody ELISA, and a pLDH ELISA in detecting asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia in blood donors in Buea, Cameroon

Parameter

pLDH ELISA % (CI)

Antibody ELISA % (CI)

RDT % (CI)

Sensitivity

86.0 (77.4 – 92.8)

69.9 (60.1 – 78.6)

88.0 (80.0 – 94.0)

Specificity

92.7 (85.6 – 97.0)

80.3 (69.9 – 88.3)

99.1 (98.0 – 99.3)

PPV

91.6 (83.4 – 96.5)

81.8 (72.2 – 89.2)

89.8 (78.0 – 92.3)

NPV

88.1 (80.2 – 93.7)

67.7 (57.4 – 76.9)

99.0 (98.2 – 99.5)

FPR

7.3 (5.8 – 9.1)

19.7 (17.3 – 22.3)

1.2 (0.6 – 2.1)

FNR

2.3 (1.5 – 3.4)

30.1 (27.3 – 33.1)

12 (6.4 – 20.0)

Agreement between tests

89.7 (84.4 – 93.7)

74.5 (67.5 – 80.6)

97.9 (96.9 – 98.6)

  1. Sensitivity = [true positive/(true positive + false negative) × 100]; specificity = [true negative/(true negative + false positive) × 100; PPV = [true positive/(true positive + false positive) × 100]; NPV = [true negative/(true negative + false negative) × 100]; Agreement = [true positive + true negative/N × 100]; FPR = 1 ˗ specificity; FNR = 1 ˗ sensitivity