Skip to main content

Table 4 Diagnosis of S. mekongi infection using serum and urine samples (n = 377)

From: Comparison of novel and standard diagnostic tools for the detection of Schistosoma mekongi infection in Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Cambodia

Type of sample/method

Overall (%)

Cambodia (%)

Lao PDR (%)

χ2

P-value

Urine

 POC-CCA

  Negative

174 (46.2)

97 (49.5)

77 (42.5)

  

  Trace

124 (32.9)

63 (32.1)

61 (33.7)

  

  Positive

79 (21.0)

36 (18.4)

43 (23.8)

2.4

0.308

 UCAA

  Negative

206 (54.6)

110 (56.1)

96 (53.0)

  

  Indecisive range

25 (6.6)

17 (8.7)

8 (4.4)

  

  Positive

146 (38.7)

69 (35.2)

77 (42.5)

4.0

0.133

Serum

 SCAA

  Negative

240 (63.7)

133 (67.9)

107 (59.1)

  

  Indecisive range

15 (4.0)

12 (6.1)

3 (1.7)

  

  Positive

122 (32.4)

51 (26.0)

71 (39.2)

10.9

0.004

ELISA combineda

 Negative

115 (30.5)

76 (38.8)

39 (21.6)

  

 Equivocal

132 (35.0)

68 (34.7)

64 (35.4)

  

 Positive

130 (34.5)

52 (26.5)

78 (43.1)

16.7

<0.001

Combined Referenceb

 Negative

203 (53.8)

121 (61.7)

82 (45.3)

  

 Positive

174 (46.2)

75 (38.3)

99 (54.7)

10.2

0.001

  1. AWE, adult worm antigen; SEA, soluble egg antigen; aeither AWE or SEA positive; bat least one of the three tests (UCAA, SCAA, Kato-Katz) positive