From: From river blindness control to elimination: bridge over troubled water
New findings | Challenges | Opportunities |
---|---|---|
Burden of disease caused by onchocerciasis is more important than previously estimated | Accurate estimation of burden of disease due to onchocerciasis, including OAE, is a pressing need | Determination of OAE prevalence and incidence provides an argument to strengthen and accelerate onchocerciasis elimination programmes by identifying areas of weakness |
 | OAE awareness and advocacy are inadequate | Determination of OAE prevalence and incidence provides an argument to obtain more funding for operational research for onchocerciasis elimination efforts |
High prevalence/ incidence of OAE suggest ongoing onchocerciasis transmission | Strengthen epilepsy surveillance in onchocerciasis endemic regions | CDDs could be engaged in assisting with epilepsy surveillance |
OAE is preventable | Biannual CDTI should be promoted | Message will increase the motivation of populations to take ivermectin, potentially increasing compliance |
 | Misconceptions and stigma associated with epilepsy | Health promotion activities to reduce misconceptions and stigma among populations |
OAE is treatable | In onchocerciasis-endemic regions, a decentralised system is needed to diagnose and treat epilepsy early and appropriately | CDDs could be trained to monitor antiepileptic treatment adherence |
 | Little collaboration between onchocerciasis elimination and mental health programmes | Onchocerciasis and public mental health programmes working together |