Skip to main content

Table 3 The comparison of the resistance of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli isolated from diarrhea cases and non–diarrhea subjects (age stratification)

From: Antibiotic resistance and molecular characterization of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella strains isolated from infections in Southwest China

Antibiotics

All age groups

<  5 years

≥ 5 years

Diarrhea n = 127 n (%)

Control n = 9 n (%)

χ 2

P value

Diarrhea n = 93 n (%)

Control n = 5 n (%)

χ 2

P value

Diarrhea n = 34 n (%)

Control n = 4 n (%)

χ 2

P value

AMP

100 (78.74)

8 (88.89)

0.294*

78 (83.87)

5 (100.00)

0.428*

22 (64.71)

3 (75.00)

0.405*

AMC

47 (37.01)

4 (44.44)

0.245*

33 (35.48)

1 (20.00)

0.318*

14 (41.18)

3 (75.00)

0.194*

CEP

38 (29.92)

4 (44.44)

0.184*

33 (35.48)

2 (40.00)

0.348*

5 (14.71)

2 (50.00)

0.132*

CTX

23 (18.11)

3 (33.33)

0.166*

21 (22.58)

2 (40.00)

0.252*

2 (5.88)

1 (25.00)

0.266*

GEN

39 (30.71)

5 (55.56)

0.091*

29 (31.18)

3 (60.00)

0.157*

10 (29.41)

2 (50.00)

0.291*

NAL

65 (51.18)

6 (66.67)

0.187*

52 (55.91)

3 (60.00)

0.349*

13 (38.24)

3 (75.00)

0.167*

CIP

7 (5.51)

3 (33.33)

0.018*

6 (6.45)

0 (0.00)

0.724*

1 (2.94)

3 (75.00)

0.002*

TCY

88 (69.29)

5 (55.56)

0.192*

64 (68.82)

3 (60.00)

0.328*

24 (70.59)

2 (50.00)

0.291*

REP

124 (97.64)

9 (100.00)

0.813*

91 (97.85)

5 (100.00)

0.900*

33 (97.06)

4 (100.00)

0.895*

SXT

79 (62.20)

5 (55.56)

0.250*

62 (66.67)

2 (40.00)

0.178*

17 (50.00)

3 (75.00)

0.278*

  1. Notes: 1: AMP Ampicillin, AMCAmoxicillin and Clavulafiate, CEP Cephalothin, CTX Cefotaxime, GEN Gentamicin, NAL Nalidixic acid, CIP Ciprofloxacin, TCY Tetracycline, REP Rifampicin, SXT Sulfamethoxazole–Trimethoprim
  2. 2: The “–” means that the data cannot be calculated, the “*” means that the data was calculated with Fisher exact
  3. 3: The bold was showed there had significant difference between two groups