Skip to main content

Table 4 Treatment and evolution “cure” in patients with loiasis: mono-therapy vs combined-therapy

From: Loiasis in sub-Saharan migrants living in Spain with emphasis of cases from Equatorial Guinea

 

N (%)

(N = 102)

Cure

Adverse effects

Steroids

n (%)

(N = 44)

Anti-histaminic

n (%)

(N = 53)

n (%)

(N = 57)

P-value*

OR (95% CI)

n (%)

(N = 14)

P-value

Ivermectin

58 (56.9)

30

 

8

 

19

37

 Ivermectin alone

16 (15.7)

0

< 0.001* 3.5 (2.2–5.6)

2/16 (12.5)

0.860

4/16 (25.0)

7/16 (43.8)

 Ivermectin with other antihelminth(s)a

42 (41.2)

30/42 (71.4)

6/42 (14.3)

15/42 (35.7)

30/42 (71.4)

Diethylcarbamazcine

57 (55.9)

50

 

10

 

32

40

 Diethylcarbamazcine alone

13 (12.7)

9/13 (69.2)

0.021*

6.0 (1.1–32.0)

2/13 (15.4)

0.816

9/13 (69.2)

7/13 (53.8)

 Diethylcarbamazcine with other antihelminth(s)a

44 (43.1)

41/44 (93.2)

8/44 (18.2)

23/44 (52.3)

33/44 (75.0)

Albendazole

20 (19.6)

13

 

3

  

9

 Albendazole

8 (7.8)

4/8 (50.0)

0.251

3.0 (0.4–20.1)

1/8 (12.5)

0.798

5/8 (62.5)

3/8 (37.5)

 Albendazole with other antihelminth(s)a

12 (11.8)

9/12 (75.0)

2/12 (16.7)

10/12 (83.3)

6/12 (50.0)

Mebendazole

43 (42.1)

  

5

 

10

21

 Mebendazole alone

9 (8.8)

2/9 (22.2)

0.022* 6.4 (1.1–35.9)

0

0.221

0

0

 Mebendazole with other antihelminth(s)a

34 (33.3)

22/34 (64.7)

5/34 (14.7)

10/34 (29.4)

21/34 (61.8)

  1. *Statistical significance level of 5% (P < 0.05)
  2. aCombined therapy: Diethylcarbamazcine-Ivermectin-Mebendazole, Ivermectin-Albendazole-Mebendazole, Diethylcarbamazcine-Ivermectin, Diethylcarbamazcine-Albendazole, Diethylcarbamazcine-Mebendazole, Ivermectin-Mebendazole, or Albendazole-Mebendazole
  3. CI: Confidential interval; OR: Odds ratio