Skip to main content

Table 1 Socio-demographic comparison between scrub typhus cases and controls, Khanh Hoa, August 2018–March 2020

From: Ecological and behavioural risk factors of scrub typhus in central Vietnam: a case-control study

Variables Cases (n = 44) n (%) Controls (n = 152) n (%) P-value mOR (95% CI)a
Age group, years
  ≤ 30 12 (27.3%) 45 (29.6%)
 31–40 11 (25.0%) 27 (17.8%) 0.29 1.9 (0.6–6.4)
 41–50 13 (29.6%) 47 (30.9%) 0.78 1.2 (0.3–5.3)
  ≥ 51 8 (18.2%) 33 (21.7%) 0.98 1.0 (0.2–6.5)
Sex
 Male 27 (61.4%) 65 (42.8%) 0.05 2.0 (1.0–4.1)
 Female 17 (38.6%) 87 (57.2%)
Ethical group
 Kinh 38 (86.4%) 125 (82.8%) 0.35 1.8 (0.6–5.9)
 Others 6 (13.6%) 26 (17.2%)
Education
 Illiteracy 2 (4.7%) 10 (6.6%)
 Primary school 16 (37.2%) 35 (23.0%) 0.34 2.3 (0.4–12.4)
 Secondary school 11 (25.6%) 60 (39.5%) 0.87 0.9 (0.2–4.7)
 High school 11 (25.6%) 30 (19.7%) 0.56 1.6 (0.3–8.7)
 University and higher 3 (7.0%) 17 (11.2%) 0.69 0.7 (0.1–5.0)
Occupation
 Not related field/sea/sand 16 (36.4%) 78 (51.3%)
 Farmer 4 (9.1%) 32 (21.1%) 0.17 0.6 (0.4–2.1)
 Gardening, growing vegetables 4 (9.1%) 6 (4.0%) 0.11 3.5 (0.8–16.0)
 Working in forests/ mountain fields 12 (27.3%) 17 (11.2%) 0.006 4.5 (1.5–12.9)
 Others 8 (18.8%) 19 (12.5%) 0.24 1.9 (0.7–5.4)
Number of people living in same household
 1–3 people/household 9 (20.5%) 40 (26.5%)
 4–5 people/household 22 (50.0%) 75 (49.7%) 0.43 1.4 (0.6–3.5)
  ≥ 6 people/household 13 (29.6%) 36 (23.8%) 0.30 1.7 (0.6–4.8)
History of scrub typhus
 Participants 2 years prior to study
  Yes 4 (9.1%) 2 (1.3%) 0.02 7.3 (1.3–39.9)
  No 40 (90.9%) 150 (98.7%)
 Family members 2 years prior to study
  Yes 2 (4.7%) 5 (3.3%) 0.64 1.5 (0.3–8.5)
  No 41 (95.4%) 147 (96.7%)
 Number of years living in same house
   ≤ 1 year 2 (4.6%) 2 (1.3%)
  2–3 years 2 (4.6%) 6 (4.0%) 0.48 0.4 (0.04–4.6)
   ≥ 4 years 40 (90.9%) 144 (94.7%) 0.22 0.3 (0.04–2.1)
  1. amOR: matched odds ratio, using conditional logistic regression **bold: P-value < 0.05