Skip to main content

Table 2 Exposures associated with scrub typhus in Khanh Hoa, Vietnam, August 2018–March 2020

From: Ecological and behavioural risk factors of scrub typhus in central Vietnam: a case-control study

Variables

Cases (n = 44) n (%)

Controls (n = 152) n (%)

P-value

mOR (95% CI)a

Field work group

 Work in forest/ hilly field and others

26 (59.1%)

24 (15.8%)

 < 0.001

23.9 (5.8–98.2)

 Work in vegetable garden and others

6 (13.6%)

15 (9.9%)

0.07

3.9 (0.9–16.6)

 Work in sugarcane/crop/rice field and others

3 (6.8%)

37 (24.3%)

0.88

0.9 (0.1–5.2)

 Work in fruit/industrial tree garden and others

3 (6.8%)

8 (5.3%)

0.02

10.5 (1.6–69.4)

 No work related to land/sand

6 (13.6%)

68 (44.7%)

–

–

Use of personal protective equipment in the field

 Yes

14 (31.8%)

86 (56.6%)

0.004

0.3 (0.1–0.7)

 No

30 (68.2%)

66 (43.4%)

–

–

Urinating in the forest/near bushes/field

 Yes

25 (56.8%)

34 (22.4%)

 < 0.001

5.6 (2.4–13.1)

 No

19 (43.2%)

118 (77.6%)

–

–

Using the same work clothes the next day

 Yes

15 (34.1%)

30 (19.7%)

0.05

2.4 (1.0–5.6)

 No

29 (65.9%)

122 (80.3%)

–

–

Changing clothes when at home

 Yes

34 (77.3%)

140 (92.1%)

0.01

0.3 (0.1–0.8)

 No

10 (22.7%)

12 (2.9%)

–

–

Always observing mice around home

 Yes

21 (47.73%)

37 (24.34%)

0.003

3.1 (1.5–6.6)

 No

23 (52.27%)

115 (75.66%)

.

.

Work around house group

 Watering plants/bonsai or carpenting + others

19 (43.2%)

54 (35.5%)

0.48

1.3 (0.6–2.9)

 Cleaning around the house + others

6 (13.6%)

34 (22.4%)

0.46

0.7 (0.2–1.9)

 Clearing bushes/barns + others

4 (9.1%)

9 (5.9%)

0.36

1.9 (0.4–7.2)

 No activities around house

15 (34.1%)

55 (36.2%)

–

–

Passing regularly at the riverside

 Yes

23 (52.3%)

42 (27.6%)

0.004

2.8 (1.3–5.6)

 No

21 (47.7%)

110 (72.4)

  

Sitting/laying directly on household floor

 Yes

23 (52.3%)

40 (26.7%)

0.001

3.9 (1.7–8.7)

 No

21 (47.7%)

110 (73.3%)

  

Household with poor sanitation/conditions

 Yes

41 (93.2%)

96 (63.2%)

 < 0.001

8.4 (2.4–29.1)

 No

3 (6.8%)

56 (36.8%)

  

Household surroundings with risk

 Yes

22 (50%)

45 (29.6%)

0.007

3.1 (1.4–7.2)

 No

22 (50%)

107 (70.4%)

  

Workplace environment with risk

 Yes

30 (68.18%)

58 (38.16%)

0.001

3.6 (1.7–7.7)

 No

14 (31.82%)

94 (61.84%)

.

.

  1. amOR, matched odds ratio, using univariable conditional logistic regression, **bold: P-value < 0.05