Skip to main content

Table 4 COVID-19 transmission and cost effectiveness of different scenarios

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis on COVID-19 surveillance strategy of large-scale sports competition

Scenario

Initial infections

COVID-19 transmission

Cost effectiveness

Accumulative infection

Accumulative unfounded number

Accumulative detection ratio/%

Symptom detection ratio/%

Total cost (million dollars)

CER (million dollars)

ICER (million dollars)

Scenario 1–9a

Scenario 1, 10b

1

90

2369.70

681.70

71.23

17.62

133.94

0.0565

–

–

2

90

2145.60

586.30

72.67

16.48

115.33

0.0538

–

0.0830

3

90

1825.90

490.40

73.14

14.19

92.20

0.0505

–

0.0768

4

90

1409.40

378.00

73.18

10.80

65.43

0.0464

–

0.0713

5

90

1006.20

241.26

76.02

6.13

41.59

0.0413

–

0.0677

6

90

641.22

132.40

79.35

3.30

22.68

0.0354

–

0.0644

7

90

368.10

46.46

87.38

1.18

10.34

0.0281

–

0.0617

8

90

293.68

28.90

90.16

0.82

9.17

0.0312

–

0.0601

9

90

268.15

25.58

90.46

0.71

9.19

0.0343

–

0.0594

10

90

890.51

145.62

83.65

5.58

31.49

0.0354

0.0693

–

11

90

822.96

137.25

83.32

5.51

28.96

0.0352

0.0653

0.0375

12

90

779.79

127.54

83.64

5.20

27.31

0.0350

0.0620

0.0378

13

90

665.88

102.69

84.58

4.17

22.45

0.0337

0.0578

0.0403

14

90

562.55

84.06

85.06

2.80

18.15

0.0323

0.0528

0.0407

15

90

450.17

60.56

86.55

1.83

13.66

0.0303

0.0472

0.0405

16

90

320.90

30.44

90.51

0.99

8.92

0.0278

0.0301

0.0396

17

90

290.44

26.47

90.89

0.74

9.33

0.0321

−0.0476

0.0369

18

90

266.93

24.18

90.94

0.69

9.31

0.0349

−0.0924

0.0356

  1. ICER, Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; CER, Cost-effectiveness ratio
  2. aThese comparisons were Scenario 1–9 without strengthening close-contact control. bThese comparisons were Scenario 1 and Scenario 10 (once NAT weekly)