Intervention | Comparator | ICER (USD) | Setting | Currency | Willingness to pay threshold (USD) | Evidence of cost-effectiveness | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAT at 6Â weeks only | No EID testing strategy | 1250/YLS | South Africa | 2013 USD | 50% of GDP (3416). Also examined thresholds of 100% and 300% of GDP | Yes | Francke et al. [24] |
NAT at birth + 6 weeks | NAT at 6 weeks only | 2900/YLS | |||||
PoC EID | SoC: conventional laboratory-based EID | 680/YLS | Zimbabwe | 2016 USD | 1 × GDP (1010) | Yes | Frank et al. [52] |
PoC EID (GeneXpert Gel) | SoC: conventional laboratory-based EID | 830/YLS | Zimbabwe | 2017 USD | 1. 1 × GDP (1600/YLS) 2. 1 × lifetime ART regimen (580/YLS) | 1. Yes | McCann et al. [51] |
Strengthened laboratory-based EID | Dominated | 2. No | |||||
PoC testing (mPIMA) | SoC: conventional laboratory-based testing (COBAS AmpliPrep®/TaqMan®) | 1554/additional infant on ART within 60 days 5976/death averted | Zambia | 2018 USD | Not listed | Yes | De Broucker et al. [53] |
PoC testing (GeneXpert) | 23/additional infant on ART within 60Â days 90/death averted | ||||||
PoC testing (mPIMA) | SoC: Centralized testing | Â | sub-Saharan Africa | 2018 USD | Not listed | Yes | Salvatore et al. [50] |
1. Low PMTCT setting | 1. 1475/death averted | ||||||
2. High PMTCT setting | 2. 3888/death averted | ||||||
PoC testing (GeneXpert) | Â | ||||||
1. Low PMTCT setting | 1. 1297/death averted | ||||||
2. High PMTCT setting | 2. 3426/death averted | ||||||
PoC testing (GeneXpert Edge) | Â | ||||||
1. Low PMTCT setting | 1. 591/death averted | ||||||
2. High PMTCT setting | 2. 1527/death averted | ||||||
PoC testing (mPIMA) + central testing |  | ||||||
1. Low PMTCT setting | 1. 1507/death averted | ||||||
2. High PMTCT setting | 2. 3963/death averted | ||||||
PoC testing (GeneXpert) + central testing |  | ||||||
1. Low PMTCT setting | 1. 1357/death averted | ||||||
2. High PMTCT setting | 2. 3574/death averted | ||||||
PoC testing (GeneXpert Edge) + central testing |  | ||||||
1. Low PMTCT setting | 1. 618/death averted | ||||||
2. High PMTCT setting | 2. 1593/death averted | ||||||
Testing at 6Â weeks, with confirmatory testing | Testing at 6Â weeks, without confirmatory testing | Cost-saving | South Africa | 2013 USD | Not Listed | Yes | Dunning et al. [54] |
Initial rapid HIV testing to screen-out HIV-uninfected infants before DNA-rtPCR | DNA-rtPCR with Roche Amplicor v1.5 | 1489/infant correctly diagnosed and informed of result | Uganda | 2007 USD | Not listed | Yes | Menzies et al. [41] |
Universal HIV exposure screening at infant immunization visits with referral to EID | SoC: 6-week NAT for infants with known HIV exposure | 1. 1340/YLS | 1. Cote d'Ivoire | 2018 USD | 1 × GDP (1720/6380/2150, respectively) | Yes | Dunning et al. [57] |
2. 650/YLS | 2. South Africa | ||||||
3. 670/YLS | 3. Zimbabwe | ||||||
Centralized EID with deferred ART based on immune/clinical criteria | Clinical/serology-based diagnosis and deferred ART | 5149/LYG | Thailand | 2011 USD | 1 × GDP (4420) | No | Collins et al. [38] |
Centralized EID with immediate ART | Â | 2615/LYG | Â | Â | Â | Yes | Â |
Quality assurance system (QAS) | No quality assurance system, misdiagnosis rate 5% | 1. Kenya: cost-saving | 1. Kenya | 2016 USD | 1. Kenya: 316,559 | Yes | Terris-Prestholt et al. [43] |
2. South Africa: cost-saving | 2. Senegal | 2. South Africa: 353,251 | |||||
3. Senegal: 107 | 3. South Africa | 3. Senegal: 3949 | |||||
4. Uganda: cost-saving | 4. Uganda | 4. Uganda: 702,078 | |||||
5. Zimbabwe: cost-saving | 5. Zimbabwe | 5. Zimbabwe: 656,845 |