Skip to main content

Table 1 Classical statistical model performance summary

From: Driving role of climatic and socioenvironmental factors on human brucellosis in China: machine-learning-based predictive analyses

Predictive models

Adj \({R}^{2}\)

Effectiveness indicator

\(P\) value

Collinearity indicator

Stepwise Regression

0.489

\(F\)(9,13,089) = 1393.606

All variables P < 0.01

\(D-W\) value = 0.788

Ridge Regression

0.481

\(F\)(8,13,090) = 1516.354

All variables P < 0.01

\(\text{NA}\)  

Robust Regression

0.488

\(F\)(9,13,089) = 1389.404

All variables P < 0.01

\(\text{NA}\)  

Quartile Regression (25%)

0.275

\(Y\)=  − 0.406

All variables, except geographical region P < 0.01

\(\text{NA}\)  

Quartile Regression (50%)

0.302

\(Y\)= 0.131

P < 0.01

\(\text{NA}\)  

Quartile Regression (75%)

0.320

\(Y\)= 0.710

P < 0.01

\(\text{NA}\)  

PLS regression (1 principal component)

0.525

\(Q{h}^{2}\)= 1.000

P < 0.05

\(\text{PRESS}\) = 4.081

PLS regression (2 principal component)

0.544

\(Q{h}^{2}\)=  −0.119

P < 0.05

\(\text{PRESS}\) = 4.021

PLS regression (3 principal component)

0.552

\(Q{h}^{2}\)=  −0.176

P < 0.05

\(\text{PRESS}\) = 4.055

PLS regression (4 principal component)

0.555

\(Q{h}^{2}\)=  −0.225

P < 0.05

\(\text{PRESS}\) = 4.149