Open Access

Critical analysis of molluscicide application in schistosomiasis control programs in Brazil

Infectious Diseases of Poverty20165:57

DOI: 10.1186/s40249-016-0153-6

Received: 23 December 2015

Accepted: 24 May 2016

Published: 4 July 2016

Abstract

In Brazil, Biomphalaria glabrata, B. tenagophila, and B. straminea are naturally infected by the trematode Schistosoma mansoni, the causative agent of schistosomiasis. Despite decades of governmental efforts through official control programs, schistosomiasis remains an important public health problem in the country: thousands of people are infected with the trematode each year and millions live in endemic areas. The World Health Organization recommends using a combination of molluscicide (niclosamide) and mass chemotherapy to control the transmission of schistosomiasis, with this treatment successfully reducing the morbidity of the disease. In the past, niclosamide has been used in official schistosomiasis control programs in Brazil. However, as B. glabrata recolonizes even after molluscicide application, the use of molluscicides has gradually decreased in the country until they were discontinued in 2002, mainly due to the rising global pressure to preserve the environment and the difficulties of obtaining licenses from the Brazilian Ministry of Environment to use toxic substances in aquatic ecosystems. Therefore, the discovery of new molluscicides, which could be more selective to Biomphalaria species and less harmful to the aquatic ecosystem, is necessary. In addition, political efforts to sensitize funders to provide grants for this field of research are required. In this context, this article aims to make a critical analysis of molluscicide application in schistosomiasis control programs in Brazil.

Keywords

Biomphalaria Molluscicide Schistosoma mansoni Schistosomiasis Vector control Brazil

Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file 1 for translations of the abstract into the six official working languages of the United Nations

Background

Despite decades of governmental efforts through official control programs, schistosomiasis remains an important public health problem in the country: thousands of people are infected with the trematode each year and millions live in endemic areas. The World Health Organization recommends using a combination of molluscicide (niclosamide) and mass chemotherapy to control the transmission of schistosomiasis, with this treatment successfully reducing the morbidity of the disease. In Brazil, as Biomphlaria glabrata recolonizes even after molluscicide application, the use of molluscicides has gradually decreased in the country. However, the discovery of new molluscicides is necessary, especially, which could be more selective to Biomphalaria species and less harmful to the aquatic ecosystem.

The trematode Schistosoma mansoni Sambon, 1907 is the causative agent of schistosomiasis, which is an important public health problem in Brazil. Even after decades of governmental efforts through official control programs, thousands of people are still infected with the trematode and millions live in endemic areas. S. mansoni is transmitted by Biomphalaria snails, which act as intermediate hosts. Snail control by means of molluscicides is considered an auxiliary method within integrated control of schistosomiasis. Between 1946 and 1955, ~7000 chemical products were tested as potential molluscicides [1]. Among these, niclosamide (2-amino ethanol salt of 2’, 5’-dichloro-4’-nitro salicylanilide; Bayluscide®, Bayer, Germany) has been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a molluscicide since the 1960s [2], and it is still the molluscicide of choice for controlling the transmission of schistosomiasis today [3].

However, it is worth noting this mollusc has been present since the Jurassic period (160 Ma ago), according to geological records in Europe and the United States [4], which demonstrates its adaptive ability. These planorbids generally do not survive for more than one year and are prolific in nature. Their persistence stems from their reproduction rate, which depends on other intrinsic ecological factors that influence their fertility, egg laying, and viability. Although these snails are hermaphrodites and can self-fertilize, they prefer to reproduce by cross-fertilization when paired. This proliferation and self-fertilization make population control in these snails difficult because one snail can produce 10 million descendants in just 3 months [5, 6]. An important peculiarity of these organisms is their capacity to resist slow desiccation and survive for more than 6 months in spite of a high mortality rate [7]. In addition to host resistance, the parasite in the primary sporocyst phase can undergo temporary suspension of development, consequently decreasing its metabolism and saving vital energy [8, 9]. Upon return of favorable conditions, the survivors rebuild the colonies (founder effect) and become the link between the previous and subsequent populations [5, 10], while the parasites return to their normal development and shed their cercariae [8, 9].

This knowledge is important for understanding the conditions and circumstances of schistosomiasis and its epidemiological characteristics in each region. Transmission levels depend on Biomphalaria species present in the focus, and the degree of compatibility between the snail species and the strain of S. mansoni that infects the local human population [11]. In Brazil, there are 11 Biomphalaria species, however, only Biomphalaria glabrata, B. tenagophila, and B. straminea maintain the S. mansoni cycle in several states [12], with different positivity rates [13] (see Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Distribution of positive Schistosoma mansoni cases (source: Ministério da Saúde, 2014) and their intermediate hosts (adapted from Paraense [12]) in Brazil

Use of molluscicides in China and globally

In two previous meetings, the WHO Expert Committee on Bilharziasis recommended the use of molluscicides as an important measure to control schistosomiasis. The first WHO report from 1953 [14] recommended the use of molluscicides with other traditionally used control measures such as chemotherapy, provision of basic sanitation, water treatment, and health education. The second report, published in 1961, concluded that the molluscicide application to combat intermediate hosts was the most efficient isolated measure to control schistosomiasis [2].

In China, before the 1950s, some synthetic molluscicides, such as sodium pentachlorophenate (NaPCP), were widely used but safety concerns and severe environmental pollution led to NaPCP being banned [15]. Following this, the Chinese government initiated widespread disease control programs using mass chemotherapy in highly endemic regions and selective chemotherapy in areas of medium and low endemicity linked with snail control through mollusciciding and environmental modification, such as cementing canals, re-adjusting irrigation systems, etc. [16]. This resulted in the reduction of the prevalence and morbidity of the disease reaching their lowest levels between 1989 and 1995 of close to 50 % in human, and 32 % in livestock such as cattle and buffalo [16, 17]. Unfortunately, just after the end of the control program in China in 2001, the disease emerged or reemerged in some regions [18], and a new integrated control program was launched in 2004, with an emphasis on health education, access to clean water and adequate sanitation, agricultural mechanization, fencing of water buffaloes, and chemotherapy [19, 20].

Currently, the molluscicide used in China is niclosamide, which has been recommended by the WHO since the 1960s [2]. Yang et al. [21] conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the molluscicidal effects of the currently recommended combination of 50 % niclosamide ethanolamine salt wettable powder and a new 4 % niclosamide ethanolamine salt powder developed by He et al. [22]. They observed that both are good enough to be used as molluscicides integrated into a schistosomiasis control program and that application more than twice annually was necessary.

King and Bertsch [23] showed in a historical retrospective focusing specifically on niclosamide that snail control is an effective means for reducing local Schistosoma transmission in several countries, such as Saint Lucia, Iran, Tunisia, Morocco, Saint Kitts and Egypt. When properly implemented, snail control is an auxiliary tool in modern mass drug delivery programs, resulting in improved prevention of Schistosoma infection and reinfection. King et al. [24] carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize prior experiences of molluscicide-based control of Bulinus and Biomphalaria spp. snails, and estimated its impact on local human Schistosoma infection. They concluded that regular focal molluscicide application contributed significantly towards the elimination of schistosomiasis in high-risk areas.

Use of molluscicides in Brazil

In Brazil, until the 1970s, various biological and chemical compounds were tested and used as molluscicides. One of these was Bacillus pinotti, Cruz and Dias 1953, isolated from the ovotestis of B. glabrata. These bacteria are proteolytic aerobic organisms that are harmless to several vertebrate species and, under certain conditions, lethal to B. glabrata and other molluscs [2527]. Studies focusing on their use in the biological control of some intermediate hosts [27] have been conducted, however, the results of these were not considered definitive [28]. Various chemical compounds, although considered toxic to the environment, have been used in experimental field studies [29], including copper sulfate, sodium pentachlorophenate, tritylmorpholine, and niclosamide. After 1970, niclosamide has been the molluscicide of choice in official schistosomiasis control programs in Brazil.

Barbosa and Costa [30], who used monthly molluscicide application as a unique measure to control schistosomiasis in a long-term study, reported a decrease in the prevalence of the disease. Pieri et al. [31] obtained similar results in an endemic area in Northeast Brazil. The combination of molluscicide application and chemotherapy showed the best results for reducing the prevalence of the disease in a short period of time. However, as B. glabrata recolonizes even after molluscicide application, this is one of the disadvantages of molluscicide use.

After 1986, the use of niclosamide progressively decreased until 2001, when only 10 instances of molluscicide applications using niclosamide were reported (see Table 1). Although the data are related only to some Northeastern Brazilian states (Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, and Sergipe), they are considered to be representative of molluscicide use throughout Brazil [32] and show the important role of molluscicides in the control of S. mansoni. Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been conducted showing the impact of using molluscicides in Brazil, which hinders the measurement of their success. Nevertheless, isolated data, from 1978 to 1986, showed that the prevalence of the disease decreased [29, 31]. After 2002, the Brazilian Ministry of Health did not receive any more reports of niclosamide use, mainly because of the increasing global pressure to preserve the environment. Subsequently, obtaining licenses from the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment to use molluscicides was difficult. After pressure from the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Health, new instructions to control agriculture plagues and human disease vectors were issued. Thus, in 2006, the Ministry of Agriculture and Public Health agencies obtained a license from the Ministry of the Environment that allowed them to decide upon the use of toxic products in special conditions (Instrução Normativa n° 109–3 de Agosto de 2006, Artigo 4 paragrafo 1°, Ministério do Meio Ambiente). Currently, the use of niclosamide is restricted to active foci and in well-defined areas with high prevalence rates of schistosomiasis.
Table 1

Number of freshwater habitats surveyed and the percentage of those that had niclosamide (Bayluscide®) application in official schistosomiasis control programs in Northeastern Brazilian states (Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, and Sergipe) in 1976–2002

Year

Number of freshwater habitats surveyed

Niclosamide

application (%)

1976

16 488

11.4

1977

43 178

3.4

1978

106 319

19.2

1979

54 817

32.4

1980

126 272

26.6

1981

123 070

23.5

1982

139 255

19.6

1983

178 178

21.0

1984

197 337

14.0

1985

212 113

14.4

1986

156 183

11.0

1987

55 339

11.1

1988

79 287

6.8

1989

100 720

7.1

1990

37 400

11.4

1991

51 012

8.5

1992

50 507

14.8

1993

45 572

15.7

1994

31 772

14.8

1995

34 181

13.7

1996

31 183

8.3

1997

27 832

14.4

1998

44 28

34.8

1999

7 774

9.4

2000

1 519

19.8

2001

3 306

0.3

2002

2 871

0

Source: Secretary of Health Surveillance, Brazilian Health Ministry

It has also been shown that niclosamide can reduce the population of snails and make a substantial impact on the prevalence and incidence of human schistosomiasis infection (when used together with treatment strategies). A 10 % decrease in the prevalence of schistosomiasis was reported in the 1950s [33]. However, molluscicides have some disadvantages, including not being cost-effective [34], having lethal effects on other organisms [35], and requiring frequent application [30, 31, 36]. A recent schistosomiasis prevalence survey of all Brazilian states, in which 220,000 fecal samples from students aged 7–14 years were tested by analyzing two slides using the Kato-Katz technique [37], revealed an estimated prevalence of more than one million people infected with schistosomiasis throughout the country [38]. However, this prevalence was likely underestimated because most Brazilian endemic areas have low prevalence rates of schistosomiasis and most of the infected population has a low worm load that is difficult to detect using the Kato-Katz technique. To test this, a study involving meticulous screening of the infected population was performed by analyzing 18 slides (as compared to one, the method adopted by official Brazilian control program) using the Kato-Katz technique in areas with low prevalence and low infection intensity. The results showed that the prevalence obtained by examining one Kato-Katz slide was 8 % compared with the prevalence of 35.8 % obtained from examining 18 slides [39, 40].

Considering the current Brazilian situation, we believe that evaluating the use of molluscicides in order to decrease schistosomiasis transmission in some endemic areas is now necessary. However, it is important to consider each endemic focus with its specific characteristics, such as the size of the transmission areas to be treated, environmental impacts and especially, the diverse, natural and artificial habitats (lakes, dams, river streams, and irrigation ditches) of Biomphalaria.

Alternatives for snail control

A promising model to control schistosomiasis transmission is introducing B. tenagophila Taim lineage, which is totally resistant to infection by S. mansoni, in areas where the transmission of schistosomiasis is only due to this Biomphalaria species. B. tenagophila is able to transfer that resistance as a dominant characteristic to its descendants by cross-breeding with susceptible snails. The model can be improved by using molluscicides before introducing B. tenagophila-resistant (Taim strain) snails [41].

Efforts are being made to discover molluscicidal products of plant origin, especially potentially biodegradable in nature, due to the growing awareness of environmental pollution. Many plant species, such as Phytolacca dodecandra [42], Alternanthera sessilis [43], Jatropha curcas [44], Euphorbia royleana, E. antisyphilitica, E. lactea ‘Cristata’, E. pulcherrima, E. neutra, Croton tiglium, Codiaeum variegatum [45], and Solanum xanthocarpum [46], have been demonstrated to have molluscicidal properties against different snail species. In Brazil, Schall et al. [47] reported the potential of latex from the plant E. splendens, imported from Madagascar, of being an efficient molluscicidal product, as it is less toxic to other aquatic organisms when compared with niclosamide. The latex produced by this plant was considered by Mott [48] as one of the most potent molluscicides among thousands of natural products obtained from plants. However, more studies need to be conducted to validate the application of E. splendens, as well as a cost analysis of these applications compared to niclosamide.

Another study performed in Brazil showed that a potent molluscicide extracted from a tropical plant species (Piplartine), which also has less environmental toxicity than niclosamide, is effective against B. glabrata [49]. Recentely, Kiros et al. demonstrated that Glinus lotoides has molluscicidal activity against B. pfeifferi snails and cercariacidal activity against S. mansoni trematodes [45]. However, all these studies are preliminary and none of these products have been recognized or authorized for use to date.

In China, some molluscicides have also been reported as effective and less toxic, such as the suspension concentrate of niclosamide [50]. A promising study was conducted by Xia et al. [51] using a novel molluscicide derivative from niclosamide, named LDS (salt of quinoid-2′, 5-dichloro-4′-nitrosalicylanilide). To assess the effects of large-scale field applications of LDS, tests were done in 15 counties in the endemic S. japonica areas of Hubei province, China. However, despite showing good results of mollusc mortality, these studies also need to clarify its impact on the environment [51].

Recently, Duval et al. [52] isolated and characterized a new microbial pathogen from B. glabrata, and classified it into the Paenibacillus genus. These bacteria invade most snail tissues and proliferate, causing high lethality, and can be transmitted both vertically and horizontally to other snails causing them to die within 30 days. However, extensive studies are necessary to evaluate the potential of these bacteria to infect other aquatic organisms and/or cause severe environmental pollution.

Conclusions

The discovery of new molluscicides, which are more selective to Biomphalaria and Bulinus, and less harmful to aquatic ecosystems, besides political efforts to sensitize funder to offer grants for this field of research, are necessary.

It is also important to consider that Brazil is a country measuring more than eight million km2 and has great variation in schistosomiasis transmission, which requires decisions concerning human safety procedures to appropriate application of molluscicides. Finally, it is important to emphasize that sanitation and water treatment are the most important measures to control schistosomiasis, in addition to other public health diseases such as gastroenteritis and viral hepatitis. Implementing these measures will yield permanent benefits to the entire human population.

Abbreviations

NaPCP, sodium pentachlorophenate; WHO, World Health Organization.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments which greatly improved the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the financial support of the PROEP/CNPq/Decit and Fiocruz.

Authors’ contributions

PMZC conceived the study, participated in its design, and helped to draft the paper. RLC participated of the design and helped to draft the paper. Both authors read and approved the final paper.

Authors’ information

PMZ Coelho: Research group of Schistosoma mansoni Biology and Its Interaction with the Host at René Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation-Minas Gerais.

RL Caldeira: Research group of Medical Helminthology and Malacology at René Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation-Minas Gerais, 30190-002, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research group of Schistosoma mansoni Biology and Its Interaction with the Host, René Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation-Minas Gerais
(2)
Research group of Medical Helminthology and Malacology, René Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation-Minas Gerais

References

  1. Ritchie LS. Chemical control of snails. In Ansari N (ed): Epidemiology and Control ofSchistosomiasis (Bilharziasis). Basel, Karger. 1973;458–532. doi:10.1159/000393137.
  2. WHO. Molluscicides. Second report of the WHO Expert Committee on Bilharziasis. World HealthOrganization Technical Report Series. 1961;214.http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/40484/1/WHO_TRS_214.pdf.
  3. Perrett S, Whitfield PJ. Currently available molluscicides. Parasitol Today. 1996;12:156–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker FC. Subfamilies, Genera, and Subgenera – Recent and Fossil. In Baker FC. The molluscan family Planorbidae. University Illinois press Urbana. Duediligence. 1945;50.http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/permissions.
  5. Paraense WL. Self and cross-fertilization in Australorbis glabratus. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1955;53:285–91.Google Scholar
  6. Paraense WL. The sites of cross and self-fertilization in planorbid snails. Rev Brasil Biol. 1976;36:535–9.Google Scholar
  7. Barbosa FS, Olivier L. Studies on the snail vectors of bilharziasis mansoni in northeastern Brazil. Bull WHO. 1958;18:895–908.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbosa FS, Coelho MV. Ação de dessecação sobre as fases larvárias intracaramujo de Schistosoma mansoni em Australorbis glabratus. Pub Av Inst Aggeu Magalhães. 1953;11:159–62.Google Scholar
  9. Barbosa FS, Coelho MV. Comportamento das fases larvárias de Schistosoma mansoni em Australorbis glabratus (Mollusca, Planorbidae) sujeitos a estivação. Pub Av Inst Aggeu Magalhães. 1955;4:51–60.Google Scholar
  10. Paraense WL, Pereira O, Pinto DB. Um aspecto da ecologia do Australorbis glabratus que favorece a reinfestação dos criadouros. Rev Serv Esp Saúde Públ. 1955;7:573–81.Google Scholar
  11. Magalhães LA. Estudo do comportamento de cepa de S. mansoni de Brasília. O Hospital. 1970;11:273–82.Google Scholar
  12. Paraense WL. The schistosome vectors in the Americas. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2001;96:7–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ministry of Health (Brazil). Surveillance of Schistosomiasis mansoni in Brazil. Press to Ministry of Health, Diretrizes técnicas. 2014;(4);93–4.http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigilancia_esquistossome_mansoni_diretrizes_tecnicas.pdf.
  14. WHO. Expert Committee on Bilharziasis: first report. World Health Organization Technical Report Series. 1953;65. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/40211/1/WHO_TRS_65.pdf.
  15. Chen C. Molluscicides and their application in China. J Schisto Cont (in Chinese). 2003;15(5):321–2.Google Scholar
  16. Zhou XN, Wang LY, Chen MG, Wu XH, Jiang QW, Chen XY, et al. The public health significance and control of schistosomiasis in China - then and now. Acta Trop. 2005;96:97–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Yuan HC, Guo JG, Bergquist NR, Tanner M, Chen XY, Wang HZ. The 1992–1999 world bank schistosomiasis research initiative in China: outcome and perspectives. Parasitol Int. 2000;49:195–207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Liang S, Yang CH, Zhong B, Qiu DC. Re-emerging schistosomiasis in hilly and mountainous areas of Sichuan. China Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84:139–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang LD, Chen HG, Guo JG, Zeng XJ, Hong XL, Xiong JJ, et al. A strategy to control transmission of Schistosoma japonicum in China. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:121–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang LD, Guo JG, Wu XH, Chen HG, Wang TP, Sp Z, et al. China’s new strategy to block transmission of schistosomiasis and beyond. TMIH. 2009;14:1475–583.Google Scholar
  21. Yang G-J, Li W, Sun L-P, Wu F, Yang K, Huang Y-X, et al. Molluscicidal efficacies of different formulations of niclosamide: result of meta-analysis of Chinese literature. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. He JX, Wang H, Wu MY, Chen XF, Shu QM, Tao W, et al. Observation on the molluscicidal effect of niclosamide ethanolamine salt dustable powder by dusting in fields. J Trop Dis Parasit. 2007;5:153–4.Google Scholar
  23. King CH, Bertsch D. Historical perspective: snail control to prevent schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(4), e0003657.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. King CH, Sutherland LJ, Bertsch D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of chemical-based mollusciciding for control of schistosoma mansoni and S. Haematobium transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(12), e0004290.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Dias E. Bacteriological warfare on the intermediate hosts of human schistosomes. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1953;52:315–1327.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Dias E. Nota prévia sobre ensaios de combate aos planorbídeos por métodos biológicos e bioquímicos. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1954;52:247–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dias E, Dawood MM. Preliminary trials on the biological snail control with Bacillus pinottii in Egypt. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1955;53:13–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Michelson EH. Studies on the biological control of schistosome-baring snails; predators and parasites of fresh-water mollusca: a review of the literature. Parasitology. 1957;47:413–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu YF, Peng Y, Liu FX. A brief review on oncomelania hupensis control in China. Sichuan J Zool. 2005;24:213–6.Google Scholar
  30. Barbosa FC, Costa DPP. A long-term schistosomiasis control Project with molluscicide in a rural area of Brazil. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1981;75:41–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pieri OS, Gonçalves JF, Sarquis O. Repeated focal mollusciciding for snail control in sugarcane area of northeast Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1995;90:535–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Barbosa CS, Favre TC, Amaral RS, Pieri OS. Epidemiologia e Controle da Esquistossomose Mansoni. In Schistosoma mansoni e esquistossomose: uma visão multidisciplinar. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Fiocruz. 2008;965–1008.Google Scholar
  33. Pellon AB, Teixeira I. Distribuição geográfica da esquistossomose mansônica no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Divisão de Organização Sanitária; 1950.Google Scholar
  34. Coura JR. Control of schistosomiais in Brazil: perpectives and proposals. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1995;90:257–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. WHO. The role of mollusciciding in schistosomiasis control. Geneva: WHO/Schisto; 1992.Google Scholar
  36. Coura Filho P, Mendes NM, de Souza CP, Pereira JP. The prolonged use of niclosamide as a molluscicide for the control of Schistosoma mansoni. Rev Inst Med Trop. 1992;34:427–31.Google Scholar
  37. Katz N, Chaves A, Pellegrino J. A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique in schistosomiasis mansoni. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1972;14:397–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Katz N, Rocha RS, Barbosa CS, Bezerra FSM, Coelho PMZ, Carvalho OS, Graeff-Teixeira C, Fazito D, Marcelino JM. National Survey on Schistosomiasis and Geohelminths in Brazil (2011–2014). Abstract book of 13° Int Cong Parasitol. 2014;s/n.Google Scholar
  39. Enk MJ, Lima AC, Drummond SC, Schall VT, Coelho PM. The effect of the number of stool samples on the observed prevalence and the infection intensity with Schistosoma mansoni among a population in an area of low transmission. Acta Trop. 2008;108:222–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Siqueira LM, Coelho PM, Oliveira AA, Massara CL, Carneiro NF, Lima AC, et al. Evaluation of two coproscopic techniques for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis in a low-transmission area in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011;106:844–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Marques DPA, Rosa FM, Maciel E, Negrão-Correa DA, Teles HMS, Caldeira RL, et al. Reduction of the susceptibility of a Biomphalaria tenagophila population to Schistosoma mansoni after introduction of a resistant B. tenagophila strain (Taim) into Herivelton Martins stream. Plos One. 2014;9, e99573.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Lemma A. Laboratory and field evaluation of the molluscicidal properties Phytolacca dodecandra (Endod). Bull Wld Hlth Org. 1970;42:597–612.Google Scholar
  43. Azare AB, Okwute SK, Kela SL. Molluscicidal activity of crude water leaf extracts of Alternanthera sesselis on Bulinus (phy) globosus. Afr J Biotechnol. 2007;6:441–4.Google Scholar
  44. Rug M, Ruppel A. Toxic activities of the plant Jatropha curcas against intermediate snail hosts and larvae of schistosomes. Trop Med Int Hlth. 2000;5:423–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Kiros G, Erko B, Giday M, Mekonnen Y. Laboratory assessment of molluscicidal and cercariacidal effects of Glinus lotoides fruits. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:220.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Wei FH, Xu XJ, Liu JB, Dai YH, Dussart G, Trigwell J. Toxicology of a potential molluscicide derived from the plant Solanum xanthocarpum: A preliminary study. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96:325–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schall VT, Vasconcellos MC, Rocha RS, Souza CP, Mendes NM. The control of the schistosome-transmitting snail Biomphalaria glabrata by the plant Molluscicide Euphorbia splendens: a longitudinal field study in an endemic area in Brazil. Acta Trop. 2001;79:165–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mott KE. Plant molluscicide. Chichester; New York: Wiley & Sons LTD; UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases; 1987. p. 326.Google Scholar
  49. Rapado LN, de Sá Pinheiro A, de Moraes Victor Lopes PO, Fokoue HH, Scotti MT, Marques JV, et al. Schistosomiasis control using piplartine against Biomphalaria glabrata at different developmental stages. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7, e2251.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Dai JR, Wang W, Liang YS, Li HJ, Guan XH, Zhu YC. A novel molluscicidal formulation of niclosamide. Parasitol Res. 2008;103:405–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Xia J, Yi Y, Xu X, Wei F, Li G, Liu M, et al. Evaluating the effect of a novel molluscicide in the endemic schistosomiasis japonica area of China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:10406–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Duval D, Galinier R, Mouahid G, Toulza E, Allienne JF, Portela J, et al. A novel bacterial pathogen of biomphalaria glabrata: a potential weapon for schistosomiasis control? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9, e0003489.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement