Open Access

Discovery and study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Karamay of Xinjiang, West China

  • Li-Ren Guan1Email author,
  • Yuan-Qing Yang1,
  • Jing-Qi Qu1,
  • Hao-Yuan Ren2 and
  • Jun-Jie Chai3
Infectious Diseases of Poverty20132:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-9957-2-20

Received: 24 May 2013

Accepted: 19 July 2013

Published: 8 September 2013

Abstract

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) was discovered in the farms of the Karamay suburb, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in the 1990s. Between 1992 and 1994, a house-to-house survey revealed a prevalence of 1.0-1.6% in the residents. The clinical types of skin lesions included papule, plaque, ulcer and nodular prurigo. Observations verified that, in some cases, the skin lesions healed spontaneously in 10–14 months, whilst in other cases, they persisted for several years. Sporadic cases of CL have continued to appear at the dermatology clinic of the local hospital since 2000. Phlebotomus wui (Ph. wui), subgenus Larroussius was confirmed as the transmitting vector. The causative agent is Leishmania infantum sensu lato.

Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file1 for translations of the abstract into six official working languages of the United Nations.

Review

Visceral leishmaniasis was one of the most important parasitic diseases, rampant in the plain region of eastern China in the early 20th century. Although it was virtually under control in that region through active detection of human infections for treatment and vector control since the 1960s, the disease has continued to occur sporadically in the western mountainous and desert areas. Considering that cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) has been endemic in the neighbouring countries such as Afghanistan, Kazakhstan and other central Asian Republics of the former USSR, whether CL exists in western China is of interest. Chtcherbakoff (1930) reported two cases of oriental sore in Kashgar, Xinjiang. There have been no further reports of CL since then until the 1980s[1]. Zhang (1983) reported a case of dermal leishmaniasis, which was inferred to be caused by Leishmania donovani in Shawan, Xinjiang[2]. Ren (1984) clinically diagnosed eight cases of oriental-sore-like CL[3], but Leishmania amastigote was not found in the smears of the skin lesions. In the autumn of 1988, we made definitive diagnosis microscopically for two cases of CL[4], and also found L. turanica in the subcutaneous ear tissue of the great gerbil at the Xiaoguai farm in Karamay, Xinjiang. Inoculation of a human volunteer with the Leishmania isolate was found to cause skin lesions[5]. It is therefore necessary to determine whether Leishmania turanica (L. turanica) is the pathogen of the local human CL and to determine its clinico epidemiology, i.e., prevalence, pathology, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, therapy and vector. This article summarises and discusses the major findings relating to CL since the 1980s.

Survey of epidemiology

A three-year survey indicated that the annual incidence of CL in Karamay was 1.6% (36/2260), 1.0% (14/1416) and 1.6% (24/1510) for the successive years from 1992 to 1994, respectively. The yearly difference was related to the resident versus migrant population ratios.

Based on the 1992 survey, the infection rate was as high as 13.1% (8/61) among those who migrated from non-endemic areas and resided in the area for less than two years, while it was only 1.3% (28/2199) for the indigenous residents[6]. Of the 22 CL cases diagnosed in April 1993, 16 of those were migrants who came to the area in the last two years. The survey also showed no family aggregation of CL. According to the Dermatology Department of the Karamay Workers Hospital’s records available since 2000, there have been individual visits to seek medical advice about CL (Li Fan, personal communication, 2013).

Clinical manifestations and pathology

The analysis of clinical manifestations for 90 cases of CL patients indicated that four types of skin lesions, viz., papule, plaque, ulcer and nodular prurigo existed, of which papule and ulcer were the more common. Generally, one to five skin lesions were visible. A few cases had abscess and pustule-like lesions. None of the 90 CL cases had clinical manifestations or any history of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Twenty-six patients were subjected to blood examinations. Leukocyte count and differential count were within the normal range. Fifteen cases were examined by B-mode ultrasonography, showing no significant abnormality in the size and thickness of the spleen[6].

Cutaneous lesions showed gross and histopathological changes. Papule and plaque: presence of numerous parasites in infected macrophages and infiltration of inflammatory cells. Concurrently, collagenous fibres decreased or disappeared. Ulcer: necrosis and detachment occurred in some ulcers, and Leishmania and debris of inflammatory cells were found in the necrotic materials. Granuloma was formed on the edge of ulcers. Congestion, edema and infiltration of inflammatory cells appeared in the dermal tissue and Leishmania amastigotes were detected in the inflammatory foci (see Figures 1,2 and3). Nodular prurigo: TB tubercle-like nodules composed of epithelioid cells, fibroblasts, giant cells and lymphocytes were observed in the dermal tissues. Newly-formed blood vessels and proliferation of collagenous fibres were seen in the nodules. Leishmania amastigotes were rarely detected[7].
Figure 1

A large ulcer on the forearm with a small nodule both containing Leishmania amastigotes.

Figure 2

An ulcer on the face.

Figure 3

Histopathology of a section from the facial ulcer (Figure 2 ) showing numerous Leishmania parasites in dermis (HE staining, x 400)

A follow-up study of three patients showed that the skin lesions disappeared spontaneously in 10–14 months without specific treatment. In some other patients, skin lesions had already been in existence for several years before they sought medical attention. Leishmania were observed in the skin tissues.

Diagnosis

The 50 CL cases diagnosed initially by histopathological examination of the skin lesions were re-examined by the skin smear technique. Typical Leishmania amastigotes were seen in 11 out of the 31 cases with skin papule or ulcer (35.5%), but not in any of the other 19 cases with plaque or nodular prurigo. Immunodiagnosis revealed a seropositive rate of 83.3% (25/30) by sandwich Dot-ELISA to detect circulating antigen/antibody-antigen complex[8].

Treatment

Ten cases (two with papule, seven with ulcer and one with nodular prurigo) with 67 skin lesions were selected for liquid nitrogen cryotherapy. After two to three days, crust was formed. Two months later, decrustation occurred and the lesion was healed. Follow-up examinations of five cases one to two years after treatment showed that the gross appearance of the former lesion sites were normal. However, a few Leishmania were found in the continuous histological sections, suggesting that although cryotherapy can heal the lesions rapidly or block the development of the dermal disease, it cannot eliminate Leishmania completely from the skin lesions[9].

Parasite biology

Growth and propagation of Leishmania in Novy-McNeal-Nicolle (NNN) medium

The homogenates of skin lesions from 21 cases were individually inoculated into Novy-McNeal-Nicolle (NNN) medium. Few promastigotes were observed only in three cases; promastigotes from two cases disappeared after passages. Only one isolate (KXG-Liu) survived in the medium. The difficulty to isolate Leishmania from these skin lesions of CL cases is in sharp contrast to the ease of growing L. turanica from ear skin tissues of great gerbils in the same medium[5, 10], suggesting that it is not the causative parasite of the 21 human CL cases.

Infectivity to experimental animals and pathological changes

Two samples (KXG-Xu and KXG-Zhang) of CL skin lesion homogenates and KXG-Liu promastigotes were inoculated separately into the abdominal cavity or testes of Lagurus lagurus and Cricetulus brabensis. Autopsy was conducted after 96–302 days post-infection. The gross examination showed visceral infection in both species of the experimental animals, just like inoculation of these animals with L. donovani (LD) and L. infantum (LI). A histopathological study showed that Leishmania parasites were present in Kupffer cells, reticuloendothelial cells in bone marrow, spleen, macrophages and dendritic cells in lymph sinus of medulla and cortex of lymph nodes, and glomeruli, epithelial cells of proximal convoluted tubules and mesenchyme of kidney. Ultrastructural studies of the plasma cells showed that their rough endoplasmic reticulum expanded markedly, suggestive of activation of the immune cells[10]. Promastigotes emerged and grew after inoculation of infected tissues into NNN medium. BALB/c mice were not susceptible when inoculated subcutaneously or intraperitoneally with Leishmania amastigotes from the patients’ skin lesions[10].

Thus, the Leishmania from the skin lesions of the CL patients produced systemic visceral infection only in the susceptible animals used, which were different from the skin lesions produced by Leishmania tropica (L. tropica) or L. turanica in BALB/c mice[5, 11].

When two Macaca rhesus monkeys were inoculated subcutaneously with KXG-Liu and KXG-Xu, macule and ulcer developed at the sites of inoculation. The skin lesions disappeared approximately three months later. However, numerous Leishmania parasites were observed in the macrophages in the muscular layer of the subcutaneous blood vessel wall tissue, but none in the visceral tissues when examined by histological sections 12–14 months after infection. Visceral tissues were also culture-negative, further indicating that the Leishmania from Karamay are cutanotropic in primate hosts[12].

Morphology of Leishmania

In the longitudinal section, the size of amastigote of KXG-Liu isolate was (3.68±0.6) μm × (1.80±0.28) μm and the size index was 6.16±1.56 by transmission electron-microscopy, similar to the observation under light microscope. The average number of submembrane microtubule of Leishmania in transverse section was 74±7[10].

Genotype DNA analysis on Leishmania

The genotype analysis for nDNA and kDNA of KXG-Liu isolate was conducted in 1994[13]. The results indicated a high homology of DNAs of the isolate to the viscerotropic LI elsewhere in Xinjiang (MHOM/CN/80/801, MHOM/CN/90/901). Subsequently, Southern blot analysis of nDNAs from KXG-Liu and KXG-Xu for gp63 gene RFLP showed high homology to the Chinese LI (MHOM/CN/86/SC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) LI reference strain (MHOM/TN/81/LEM235), differing from L. tropica and L. turanica[14]. Phylogenetic analyses of gene sequences from these Karamay CL isolates distinguish them from three variants of viscerotropic L infantum from China and elsewhere, but segregate all together into the same clade of L donovani/infantum complex[15]. Pulse field gel electrophoresis was used to analyse the karyotypes of the two isolates, showing its similarity to the LI from the bone marrow of a VL patient in Shanshan County, Xinjiang (MHOM/CN/90/901)[16]. The two Karamay CL isolates were typed by zymodeme analysis to belong to L. donovani (MON-138) by professor Jean-Pierre Dedet, Ecological Medicine Lab, Montpellier University (unpublished, 1997).

Studies on vector sandfly

Sandfly species in CL endemic and non-endemic areas

Sandflies were collected by a suction tube, by a funnel trap or by sticky paper during the months of June to August in 1987–1993. Identification of species was based on morphological features. The common sandfly species found in Karamay were Phlebotomus mongolensis (Ph. mongolensis) and Ph. wui, accounting for 45.9% (4105/13733) and 24.2% (3318/13733), respectively. The rest 29.9% (4105/13733) were a mixture of Ph. andrejevi, Ph. caucasicus, Sergentomyia minutus sinkiangenesis and S. arpaklensis. The survey in the adjacent four counties, i.e., Wushu, Fukang, Qitai and Yiwu, 100–400 km away from Karamay, showed different sandfly species. In Wushu, Fukang and Qitai, Ph. mongolensis and Ph. andrejevi were the dominant species, accounting for 90.1% to 97.9%, respectively, while Ph. wui constituted only 0–2.1%. The dominant species in Yiwu was Ph. alexandri, accounting for 70.8%[17, 18].

Relationship between sandflies and humans

Phlebotomus mongolensis and Ph. wui in Karamay were anthropophilic, accounting for 43.1% (1111/2580) and 30.3% (773/2580), respectively, while Ph. andrejevi only accounted for 0.8% (21/2580) of the total catches indoors. A total of 2767 man-biting sandflies were captured by human-bait in the field, of which the proportion of Ph. wui was 55.7% and of Ph. mongolensis was 39.0%; while the two species captured indoors accounted for 61.4% and 35.7%, respectively[18].

Natural infection of sandflies and identification of parasite species

The natural infection rate of Ph. wui with promastigotes was 5.9% (58/985) for those captured in the field and 2.9% (13/449) for those in the residential sites. The gut of positive flies was full of promastigotes when examined microscopically. Parasites were found in the pharynx, mouth and proboscis of 34 sandflies (47.9%)[18]. Inoculation of the promastigotes from 36 infected sandflies into NNN medium resulted in no viable cells, except one (KXG-65)[19], exactly as observed with the amastigotes from CL lesions in the same medium[10]. In a separate study, starved Ph. wui females were found to acquire infection when allowed to feed on L. turanica-infected BALB/c mice, as indicated by microscopy of fed flies after dissection and the successful cultivation of promastigotes from 10 such flies[19]. The results from the above experiments suggest that the parasite species in naturally infected Ph. wui is not L. turanica, which is found in the local great gerbils.

Inoculation of promastigotes from naturally infected Ph. wui directly into the footpad of 14 BALB/c mice produced no skin infections, although few Leishmania amastigotes were found in the spleen tissue smears. Lagurus lagurus were then inoculated intraperitoneally with the same fly-derived promastigotes – of the five survived for more than three months, four developed visceral infection showing pathological changes as those caused by LI. When small pieces of spleen from the infected animal were inoculated into NNN medium, two isolates (KXG-918, KXG-927) were obtained for continuous passages. When these two isolates and KXG-65 were inoculated intraperitoneally to C. brabensis, the infection site and pathology were identical to those isolated from the local human CL caused by LI[20]. Subcutaneous inoculation of a monkey with sandfly-derived promastigotes also exclusively caused skin lesions[12].

Hybridisation by using 32p labelled gp63 gene as probe suggested that three isolates (KXG-918, KXG-927 and KXG-65) of promastigotes from naturally infected Ph. wui were highly homologous to LI of Xinjiang, but showed marked variation in nDNA hybridisation map as compared with those of both L. turanica and L. tropica[14, 20]. The zymodeme of the three isolates, MON-138, was identical (Dedet, unpublished, 1997).

Ph. mongolensis and Ph. andrejevi prevalent in Karamay are the vectors for transmission of L turanica in great gerbils, as shown by examining 16 independent isolates of this species[5, 19].

Conclusion

Based on the information presented, CL is expected to remain endemic in Karamay, Xinjiang. It is caused by a variant of L. infantum, which is transmitted by Ph. wui. Different variants of LI are responsible for VL and CL in Xinjiang[15]. The current discovery is consistent with previous findings that LI, normally the causative agent of VL, also produces CL in 11 countries of the Eastern hemisphere[2123]. The WHO publication on the control of leishmaniases places L. infantum into the L. donovani complex[22]. Therefore, the isoenzyme electrophoresis results noted by Dedet based on the human and sandfly isolates that we provided showed no contradiction with our results of genotype DNA analysis. In three countries in the Western hemisphere, Leishmania chagasi (L. chagasi) was thought to cause CL[21]. Rioux and associates examined the isoenzyme gene loci for 137 isolates from six countries in Latin America and proved that those isolates and LI had the same zymodemes[24, 25]. LI in the Mediterranean basin was reported to have two different pathogenic strains in humans with and without immunodeficiency syndromes. Strain with zymodeme MON-1 (LON-49) mainly causes VL, while those of zymodemes MON-24, -29, -33, -78, -II, -III are associated with CL[26]. Angelica et al. indicated that differences exist in genotypes between the isolates of viscerotropic and cutanotropic LI[27]. Based on sequence variations, Waki et al. designated CL LI (KXG-Lu, -Xu and -Liu) and sandfly isolate (KXG-65) in Karamay as L infantum var. 7 and differentiated it from other human LI variants[15]. Further studies are needed to elucidate the distribution and phylogenetic relationships of different LI variants in China.

The LI causing CL in Karamay was identical with its counterpart elsewhere in the following characteristics: 1. Cultivation of LI causing CL directly from patient and sandfly samples in vitro is difficult, but made possible after inoculation of susceptible animals for visceral infection[28, 29]; 2. The LI from Karamay produced visceral infection, which is rather marginal in inbred BALB/c mice, but is significant in susceptible animals, such as Chinese hamsters[30, 31]; and 3. The vector for the LI in Karamay is Ph. wui, whereas it is Ph. perniciosus in Malta and Spain, Ph. pefiliewi in Italy and Algeria, Ph. ariasi in France and Spain, Ph. neglectus in Greece and Ph. Tobbi (Turkey) in the Mediterranean basin, though all in subgenus Larroussius[20, 25, 28, 3033].

Although the great gerbils are widely distributed in Xinjiang north of the Tian Shan Mountain, L. major has not been found in rodents or humans[5, 34], and there is no record of CL in the south of the Tian Shan Mountain. Therefore, there is no clear evidence for importation of this species to account for CL endemicity in Xinjiang.

While L. turanica in great gerbils in Karamay has the capacity to cause human infection experimentally[5], the parasite species has not been isolated from the skin of CL patients. This may be related to the activity of its natural vectors: Ph. andrejevi is active mainly near the rodent burrow in the field and it is difficult to find infected Ph. mongolensis in residential sites[18, 19]. Thus, L. turanica does not contribute to the endemicity of local CL. Circumstantial evidence suggests that CL in Karamay is probably a zoonotic disease based on the following considerations: 1. The area was previously a barren desert and CL patients began to emerge after human settlement for economic activities; 2. CL occurs only sporadically and shows no evidence of family aggregation; and 3. Ph. wui is an exophilic species, showing high natural infection rate of LI among those in the uninhabited desert area. It is thus more likely that the source of parasites for sandfly infections is a wild animal reservoir instead of CL patients. Apparently, further investigation is needed to elucidate its prevalent scope and reservoir hosts.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 3880718, 39270628) and the Director Fund from the Division of Tropical Disease Control, WHO/HQ in 1992. The authors’ appreciation also goes to Professor Wei-Xia Shen of the Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine for her assistance in preparing the English manuscript; and to Professor Jean-Pierre Dedet, Laboratoire de Parasitologie et Centre National de Reference des Leishmanioses, CHU de Montpellier, France for helping identify the Leishmania parasites isolated from the CL patients and Ph. wui by isoenzyme electrophoresis.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(2)
General Hospital of Xinjiang Petroleum Bureau
(3)
Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

References

  1. Chtcherbakoff SG: Tropical diseases at Kashgar (Western China). Rev Med Hyg Trop. 1930, 22 (5): 233-256. Trop Dis Bull 1931, 28(9):777Google Scholar
  2. Zhang ZY, Hu WH: A case of dermal leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania donovani. Chin J Dermatol. 1983, 16 (2): 80-(in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Ren HY, Cui ZC: On cutaneous leishmaniasis (orental sore), Report 8 cases. J Clin Dermatol. 1984, 1: 9-13. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Guan LR, Xu YX, Wang G, Chai JJ: Two cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Karamay, Xinjiang, China. Abstract of the paper presented of the International Scientific Conference on Epidemiology. 1989, Beijing, p169-Google Scholar
  5. Guan LR, Yang YQ, Qu JQ, Shen WX: Discovery and study of Leishmania turanica for the first time in China. Bull WHO. 1995, 73 (5): 667-672.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ren HY, Guan LR, Yang YQ, Zuo XP, Li F, Xu YX, Abulikemujiang , Deng LQ: Clinicopathologic analysis on 90 cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Karamay of Xinjiang. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 1996, 14 (3): 226-230. in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  7. Yang YQ, Guan LR: Clinicopathological observations on 28 cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Karamay area. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 1994, 12 (3): 18-20. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Qu JQ, Bao YF, Xu YX, Guan LR, Wang JY, Handman E: Sandwich dot ELISA in diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Xinjiang. J Practic Parasit Dis. 1996, 4 (4): 149-151. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Guan LR, Ren HY, Yang YQ, Deng LQ, Zuo XP, Xu YX, Abulikemujiang : Observation on the freezing effect of liquid nitrogen for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 1995, 13 (2): 152-153. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Guan LR, Yang YQ, Shen BG, Chai JJ, Ren HY, Xu YX, Zuo XP, Wu JT, Deng LQ: Study on biology of Leishmania from cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Karamay of Xinjiang. Endemic Dis Bull. 1996, 11 (3): 1-5. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Wang J, Qu JQ, Guan LR, Feng LZ (personal consultation) see: A study on the Leishmania parasite of the great gerbil in northwest China. Acta Parasitol Sinica. 1964, 1 (2): 105-117. in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  12. Yang YQ, Guan LR, Wu JT: Study on the parasitic character of Leishmania infantum in monkey in Karamay area. Endemic Dis Bull. 1997, 12 (1): 8-11. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Guan LR, Xu YX, Yang YQ: The discovery of cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania infantum for the first time in Xinjiang of China. Proceeding of the 8th symposium of the Chinese protozoological society(Abstracts). 1995, Shanghai: The Chinese Protozoological Society, p115-in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang JY, Qu JQ, Wang RQ, Guan LR, Ren HY, Chang KP: Analysis on homology in several isolates of Leishmania from Karamay. Xinjiang. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 1996, 14 (4): 266-269. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Waki K, Dutta S, Ray D, Kolli BK, Akman L, Kawazu S, Lin CP, Chang KP: Transmembrane molecules for phylogenetic analyses of pathogenic protists: Leishmania-specific informative sites in hydrophilic loops of trans- endoplasmic reticulum N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate transferase. Eukaryot Cell. 2007, 6: 198-200. 10.1128/EC.00282-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wu B, Qu JQ: Karyotype analysis of Leishmania isolates in China. (English) Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 1998, 16 (6): 425-431. in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  17. Guan LR, Chai JJ, Yang LP: Relationship between geographical distribution of sandflies and landscape features in Xinjiang of China. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 1996, 14 (1): 26-32. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Guan LR, Xu YX, Zuo XP, Wang G: Study on the vector transmitting cutaneous leishmaniasis in Karamay of Xinjiang. Endemic Dis Bull. 1996, 11 (1): 38-41. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Guan LR, Xu YX, Yang YQ, Zuo XP, Wang G, Chai JJ, Qu JQ, Bao YF, Wu JT, Yong YT: Leishmaniasis in Karamay 9. Identification of Leishmania parasite isolates from naturally infected sandflies. Endemic Dis Bull. 1992, 7 (3): 9-16. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Guan LR, Yang YQ, Xu YX, Qu JQ, Zuo XP, Wang G, Lu HG, Zhong L, Chang K-P: Leishmaniasis in Karamay 14. Identification of promastigotes isolates from naturally infected Phlebotomus major wui. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 1994, 12 (4): 257-261. in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  21. Desjeux P: Information on the Epidemiology and Control of the Leishmaniases by Country or Territory. 1991, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  22. World Health Organization: Control of the Leishmaniases – Report of a WHO Expert Committee, WHO Technical Report Series 793. 1990, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  23. Svobodová M, Alten B, Zídková L, Dvorák V, Hlavacková J, Mysková J, Seblová V, Kasap OE, Belen A, Votýpka J, Volf P: Cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania infantum transmitted by Phlebotomus tobbi. Int J Parasitol. 2009, 39 (2): 251-256. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.06.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rioux JA: Leishmania infantum as a cause of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1990, 84 (6): 898-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rioux JA, Lanotte G, Petter F, Dereure J, Akalay O, Pratlong F, Velez ID, Fikri NB, Maazoun R, Denial M, Jarry DM, Zahaf A, Ashford RW, Cadi-Soussi M, Killick-Kendrick R, Benmansour N, Moreno G, Périères J, Guilvard E, Zribi M, Kennou MF, Rispail P, Knechtli R, Serres E: Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the western Mediterranean Basin, an ecoepidemiological analysis of three foci in Tunisia, Morocco and France. Leishmania Taxonomie-Phylogeneses (Coll.Int.CNRS/INSERM 1984) IMEEE Montpellier. 1986, p365-p391.Google Scholar
  26. Gradoni L, Gramiccia M: Leishmania infantum tropism: strain genotype or host immune status?. Parasitol Today. 1994, 10 (7): 264-267.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Angelica MC, Gramiccia M, Gradoni L: Study on genetic polymorphism of Leishmania infantum through the analysis of restriction enzyme digestion patterns of kinetoplast DNA. Parasitology. 1989, 99 (3): 301-309. 10.1017/S0031182000058996.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Gradoni L, Gramiccia M, Léger N, Pesson B, Madulo-Lond G, Killick-Kendrick R, Killick-Kendrick M, Walton BC: Isoenzyme characterization of Leishmania from man, dog and sandflies in the Maltese islands. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 85 (2): 217-219. 10.1016/0035-9203(91)90027-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gramiccia M, Ben-Ismail R, Gradoni L, Ben Rachid MS: A Leishmania infantum enzymatic variant, causative agent of cutaneous leishmaniasis in north Tunisia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 85 (3): 370-371. 10.1016/0035-9203(91)90294-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gramiccia M, Gradoni L, Pozio E: Leishmania infantum sensu lato as an agent of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Abruzzi region, Italy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987, 81 (2): 235-237. 10.1016/0035-9203(87)90225-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pozio E, Gramiccia M, Gradoni L, Amerio P: Isolation of the agent causing cutaneous leishmaniasis in Italy and its visceralization in inbred hamsters. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1985, 79 (2): 260-261. 10.1016/0035-9203(85)90352-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Izri MA, Belazzoug S: Phlebotomus (Larroussius) perfiliewi naturally infected with dermotropic Leishmania infantum at Tenes, Algeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 87 (4): 399-10.1016/0035-9203(93)90011-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Maroli M, Gramiccia M, Gradoni L: Natural infection of Phlebotomus perfiliewi with Leishmania infantum in a cutaneous leishmaniasis focus of the Abruzzi region, Italy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987, 81 (4): 596-598. 10.1016/0035-9203(87)90420-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Xu YX, Guan LR, Bao YF, Qu JQ: Continuing detection of Leishmania turanica in desert area in north of Xinjiang. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 1996, 14 (2): 153-(in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright

© Guan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.