Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Opinion
  • Open Access

Prevalence of hepatitis C virus among street children in Iran

Infectious Diseases of Poverty20187:88

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-018-0469-5

  • Received: 16 February 2018
  • Accepted: 30 July 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Street children are forced to spend a lot of time away from their homes and some of them do not have homes at all, due to economic and family problems, which makes them exposed to many health problems, such as the hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Iran, like many other countries in the world, experiences the burden of street children, however, the rate of HCV among street children is virtually unknown. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of HCV among street children in Iran.

Main body

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The study protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO under identification term CRD42018082336. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify published studies reporting on the prevalence of HCV among street children in Iran. Several international scholarly databases, including Web of Science, PubMed®/MEDLINE®, Embase, Scopus®, Google Scholar and Directory of Open Access Journals, as well as Iranian databases such as MagIran and Barakathns were searched. Studies published between 1988 and December 2017 with any of the following keywords were selected: (street OR homeless OR labour) AND (children OR child OR infant) AND (hepatitis C OR hepatitis C virus OR HCV OR viral hepatitis OR hepatitis OR hepacivirus) AND Iran. Moreover, a grey literature search was performed in order to obtain other potentially relevant studies. The search was carried out without any language restrictions. Four studies, surveying a total of 1691 street children, conducted between 2006 and 2017 were found to be eligible for inclusion in the review and therefore analysed. Three studies were conducted in Tehran and one in Isfahan. The prevalence of HCV among street children in Iran was found to be high, at 2.4% (95% CI: 1.8–3.3).

Conclusions

Since the prevalence of HCV among street children in Iran is quite high, health decision- and policy-makers should pay more attention to street children and widen support channels, both social and economic. Further studies should be conducted among street children in different cities of Iran to add to the knowledge base of HCV among street children in the country. The health system should provide facilities for street children to be screened to quickly diagnose illnesses and prevent them from developing complications.

Keywords

  • Systematic review
  • Meta-analysis
  • Hepatitis C virus
  • Street children
  • Iran

Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file 1 for translations of the abstract into the five official working languages of the United Nation.

Background

A street or labour child is “any girl or boy who has not reached adulthood, for whom the street (in the broadest sense of the word, including unoccupied dwellings, wasteland, etc.) has become her or his habitual abode and/or sources of livelihood, and who is inadequately protected, supervised or directed by responsible adults” [1]. Street children are exposed to many health problems [2] due to their poor living conditions and are at risk of developing serious communicable illnesses such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV(, viral hepatitis such as hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and other infections [3, 4].

Among these diseases, HCV is one of the main public health concerns worldwide, imposing a dramatic economic burden for healthcare systems [5]. The World Health Organization estimates that around 71 million people in the world are infected with chronic hepatitis C infection [6]. Children are particularly at risk and, unfortunately, there is scarce information regarding the prevalence of HCV in this age group. HCV in children is often asymptomatic, and a screening policy should be considered as a beneficial strategy for this group [7, 8].

In Iran, HCV is considered a public health challenge, with the Ministry of Health trying to combat the disease by implementing various programmes. According to a recent meta-analysis published in 2018, the prevalence of HCV in the general population of Iran is about 0.3% and among high-risk populations, it is 32.1% [9]. The prevalence of HCV among street children in Iran is virtually unknown.

Since knowledge is crucial for making appropriate decisions about people’s health, this gap in knowledge has prevented health policy- and decision-makers from having a clear picture of the situation pertaining to street children. Moreover, in Iran few studies have been conducted on the prevalence of HCV among street children. Given the clinical and epidemiological relevance of this problem, this study aimed to systematically determine the prevalence of HCV among street children in Iran by synthesising existing literature utilising a rigorous, transparent and reproducible approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis is the best way to collate evidence, and pooling together different studies can increase their statistical power and significance.

Methods

This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [10]. The study protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO under the identification term CRD42018082336.

Literature search

Several international scholarly databases were searched, including Web of Science, PubMed®/MEDLINE®, Embase, Scopus®, Google Scholar and Directory of Open Access Journals, as well as Iranian databases such as MagIran and Barakathns.

Articles published between 1988 (the year in which HCV was described and confirmed) and December 2017 featuring the following keywords were selected: (street OR homeless OR labour) AND (children OR child OR infant) AND (hepatitis C OR hepatitis C virus OR HCV OR viral hepatitis OR hepatitis OR hepacivirus) AND Iran. This search strategy was adopted without any language restrictions. Reference lists of each study were also reviewed and hand-searched to increase the chance of finding relevant studies.

Outcome(s)

The outcomes of the present study are the prevalence of HCV (primary outcome) and the risk factors for HCV (secondary outcome) in street children in Iran. If enough data (in terms of socio-demographic variables and other parameters related to risk factors) are provided, it was decided that odds ratios (ORs) will be calculated.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies were included if: 1) the investigations were conducted as observational studies (cross-sectional, cohort, case-control) reporting the prevalence of HCV in street children in Iran; 2) the prevalence could be computed based on available data, and 3) the studies used valid screening tests for the diagnosis of HCV. Studies were excluded if: 1) the investigations reported unclear or insufficient quantitative data, and 2) the studies provided overlapping data.

Data extraction

Two authors independently extracted data from the studies. Data extracted included the name of the first author, the year of publication, the location, sample size, age of subjects, the test used to screen HCV and the number of positive patients. Any disagreement was resolved by a discussion.

Evaluating the quality of the studies

To evaluate the methodological quality of the studies, the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist was used [11]. Based on this checklist, studies that received 1–7 points were deemed of poor quality, 8–15 were considered of medium quality and 16–22 points were judged to be of high quality.

Statistical analysis

To estimate the prevalence of HCV among Iranian street children, the DerSimonian and Laird fixed-effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) [12] was used. An initial, exploratory analysis was performed and as the heterogeneity among studies was found to be less than 50%, a fixed-effects model was then used.

To calculate the prevalence of HCV, the number of people who tested positive was determined and then this number was divided by the total number of study participants, as shown below:
$$ p=\frac{number\ of\ HCV\ patients+}{number\ of\ participants\ } $$
$$ q=1-p $$
$$ standard\ error=\sqrt{\frac{p\bullet \left(1-q\right)}{n}} $$

The heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using the I2 test [13]. As the number of studies retained in the current systematic review and meta-analysis was less than ten, it was not possible to estimate the publication bias [14]. The stability of the results was investigated by sensitivity analysis, evaluating the impact of removing each individual study.

Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) version 2 software (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA) was used to analyse the data. Figures with P-values of less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

In the initial search, 46 studies were found and after the removal of duplicates, 30 studies were reviewed by two authors. After reviewing the title and abstract, four studies were found to be eligible for inclusion in the current review and were therefore analysed [1518]. Figure 1 shows the process of retrieval and selection of the studies.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The process of searching for and selecting the studies

The four studies, surveying a total of 1691 street children, were conducted between 2006 and 2017. All investigations were cross-sectional studies. Three studies were conducted in Tehran and one study in Isfahan. The characteristics of the studies are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1

The characteristics of studies

First author

Year

City

Sample size

Number of participants infected with HCV

Gender of infected with HCV

Age (Year±SD)

Odds ratio of risk factor reported

Study design

Test

Vahdani

2006

Tehran

102

0

0

10.1± 3

Not reported

Cross-sectional

ELISA

Fallah

2008

Tehran

203

7

Boy=7,Girl=0

NA

Not reported

Cross-sectional

ELISA

Ataei

2010

Isfahan

386

4

Boy=4,Girl=0

12.62±3.23

Not reported

Cross-sectional

ELISA

Foroughi

2017

Tehran

1000

26

Unclear

15.62 ±2.5

Not reported

Cross-sectional

ELISA

Sample sizes ranged from 102 to 1000 subjects, with the number of participants infected with HCV ranging from 0 to 26. Infected individuals were all males, with one study unclear on the sex of the sample participants [18]. The mean ages ranged from 10.1 to 15.6 years, with age not reported in one study [16]. All studies utilised enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine whether the children had HCV?

The methodological quality of the studies was appraised. Vahdani et al.’s [15], Ataei et al.’s [17] and Foroughi et al.’s [18] studies were considered of high quality whereas Fallah et al.’s [16] study was deemed to be of moderate quality.

Based on the fixed-effects model, the prevalence of HCV among street children in Iran was found to be 2.4% (95% CI: 1.8–3.3). The observed heterogeneity was 43.3%, which was found to be not statistically significant. Figure 2 is a forest plot of the included studies.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The overall prevalence of HCV among Iranian street children

A sensitivity analysis showed that the results were stable. Before and after the sensitivity analysis, the results did not change, confirming the reliability of our findings, in that removing each included study had no impact (see Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

A sensitivity analysis

The following risk factors were present in the children with HCV in the four selected studies: tattoos, cigarette smoking, drug addiction, alcohol abuse, sexual violence, having unprotected sexual intercourse and parents with a history of injection drug use. Unfortunately, there were not enough data to calculate the ORs.

Discussion

The present study is a systematic and meta-analytical review of the prevalence of HCV among street children in Iran. As health ministry plans are developed in each country based on community needs, access to updated health statistics and solid scientific evidence is essential. Determining the frequency of the disease and high risk groups is very helpful [19]. As such, the present systematic review and meta-analysis has found a dearth of studies investigating the problem of HCV among street children in Iran.

According to the studies analysed in this review, the prevalence of HCV among street children in Iran was 2.4% as of 2017. This prevalence is higher in comparison with the general population in Iran, which was reported to be 0.6% in a meta-analysis study conducted in 2017 [20] or the 0.5% reported among blood donors conducted in 2013 [21]. This finding is a very serious warning for decision- and policy-makers in the Iranian health sector that street children are easily exposed to HCV and other infectious diseases. Unfortunately, as street children are at risk of various factors such as narcotics, tattooing, physical abuse, lack of proper health facilities, and lack of social and family support, they can be exposed to HCV easily [22]. In addition, the risk factors reported in the selected studies varied among the investigations and this could further explain this difference in prevalence.

The reviewed studies were carried out in two metropolitan areas: Tehran and Isfahan. Due to financial difficulties, many families migrate to larger cities to get away from social hardships such as addiction, divorce, neglect or abortion. Continuously wandering for hours along the streets exposes children to physical and psychological hazards, and, in some cases, to illness, such as blood-borne infectious diseases and STDs [2325].

The prevalence of HCV among street children in Canada [26] was 12.6% in 2001, whereas in 1995 in Brazil [27] it was 3%: higher than the prevalence found in the reviewed studies. One of the most important reasons for a lower rate of HCV could be the implementation of the hepatitis B vaccination plan in Iran for all newborns [28], which could improve the health-literacy and the awareness about hepatitis, with studies confirming that this programme could significantly reduce the incidence of hepatitis in Iran [2932]. Of course, social, cultural and health conditions can also affect the incidence of HCV [33, 34]. Paying attention to the prevalence of HCV among street children is important, and different countries should try to identify their prevalence rates in order to implement programs and policies [3538].

Limitations of study

This review has some limitations. Studies conducted on this topic are very limited and therefore researchers in Iran should research the spread of infections such as HCV among street children further. In addition, these studies should be conducted in different cities of Iran in order to provide a better understanding of the status of the infection based on geographical areas. Other limitations include a lack of information to calculate gender-based prevalence or risk factors that can have a significant impact on the disease. In addition, due to the small number of studies included, the publication bias and meta-regression to explore possible sources of heterogeneity could not be performed, even though heterogeneity was found to be less than 50% and, as such, not statistically significant.

Given the abovementioned limitations, further studies should be conducted among street children in Iran in order to improve the current knowledge of the problem and provide health decision- and policy-makers with better evidence for them to design social and economic support programmes.

Conclusions

The findings of this study showed that the prevalence of HCV among street children in Iran is quite high, considerably higher in comparison with the general population of Iran or other clinical populations, such as blood donors. The health system should provide facilities for street children to be screened to quickly diagnose illnesses and prevent them from developing complications.

Abbreviations

CI

Confidence interval

HCV: 

Hepatitis C virus

OR

Odds ratio

STD: 

Sexually transmitted disease

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was part of a PhD thesis supported by the School of Health Management, Iran University of Medical Sciences (ID: IUMS/SHMIS_1396/9423557001).

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the findings can be found in the main paper.

Authors’ contributions

MB and HAG designed the study. MB and NLB collected the data and performed the data analysis. All authors edited and revised the paper for grammar. All authors read and approved the final paper for publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(2)
Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(3)
School of Public Health, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

References

  1. United Nations. Strategies to combat homelessness. Nairobi: UN-habitat; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Embleton L, Mwangi A, Vreeman R, Ayuku D, Braitstein P. The epidemiology of substance use among street children in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2013;108(10):1722–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Stojadinović A, Batrnek Antonić D, Perinović M, Rončević N. Sexual behavior of street children. Med Pregl. 2015;68(7–8):245–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cumber SN, Tsoka-Gwegweni JM. The health profile of street children in Africa: a literature review. J Public Health Afr. 2015;6(2):566.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Razavi H, ElKhoury AC, Elbasha E, Estes C, Pasini K, Poynard T, et al. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease burden and cost in the United States. Hepatology. 2013;57(6):2164–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Hellard ME, Chou R, Easterbrook P. WHO guidelines on testing for hepatitis B and C – meeting targets for testing. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(Suppl 1):703.Google Scholar
  7. Aziz S, Rajper J, Noorulain W. Treatment outcome of HCV infected paediatric patients and young adults at Karachi, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2012;24(3–4):56–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yeung LT, To T, King SM, Roberts EA. Spontaneous clearance of childhood hepatitis C virus infection. J Viral Hepat. 2007;14(11):797–805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mahmud S, Akbarzadeh V, Abu-Raddad LJ. The epidemiology of hepatitis C virus in Iran: systematic review and meta-analyses. Sci Rep. 2018;8:150.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(11):867–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Mueller KF, Meerpohl JJ, Briel M, Antes G, von Elm E, Lang B, et al. Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods. Syst Rev. 2013;2:60.Google Scholar
  15. Vahdani P, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Gachkar L, Sharafi K. Prevalence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus, and syphilis among street children residing in southern Tehran, Iran. Arch Iranian Med. 2006;9(2):153–5.Google Scholar
  16. Fallah F, Karimi A, Eslimi G, Rafie Tabatabaie S, Goudarzi H, Radmanesh Ahsani R, et al. The assessment of hepatitis B and C prevalence in street children of Tehran from Farvardin to Shahrivar 1386. Res Med. 2008;32(2):147–51.Google Scholar
  17. Ataei B, Nokhodian Z, Babak A, Shoaei P, Mohhammadzadeh M, Sadeghi R. Seroprevalence of hepatitis C (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among street children in Isfahan, Iran. Tehran Univ Med J. 2010;67(11):811–6.Google Scholar
  18. Foroughi M, Moayedi-Nia S, Shoghli A, Bayanolhagh S, Sedaghat A, Mohajeri M, et al. Prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV among street and labour children in Tehran, Iran. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93(6):421–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mirminachi B, Mohammadi Z, Merat S, Neishabouri A, Sharifi AH, Alavian SH, et al. Update on the prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among Iranian general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepat Mon. 2017;17(12):e42291.Google Scholar
  21. Khodabandehloo M, Roshani D, Sayehmiri K. Prevalence and trend of hepatitis C virus infection among blood donors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(8):674–82.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Towe VL, Ul Hasan S, Zafar ST, Sherman SG. Street life and drug risk behaviors associated with exchanging sex among male street children in Lahore, Pakistan. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44(3):222–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. de Carvalho FT, Neiva-Silva L, Ramos MC, Evans J, Koller SH, Piccinini CA, et al. Sexual and drug use risk behaviors among children and youth in street circumstances in Porto Alegre, Brazil. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(4 Suppl):S57–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Seth R, Kotwal A, Ganguly KK. Street and working children of Delhi, India, misusing toluene: an ethnographic exploration. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40(11):1659–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Turkmen M, Okyay P, Ata O, Okuyanoğlu S. A descriptive study on street children living in a southern city of Turkey. Turk J Pediatr. 2004;46(2):131–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Roy É, Haley N, Leclerc P, Boivin J-F, Cédras L, Vincelette J. Risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection among street youths. CMAJ. 2001;165(5):557–60.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Martins RM, Porto SO, Vanderborght BO, Rouzere CD, Queiroz DA, Cardoso DD, et al. Short report: prevalence of hepatitis C viral antibody among Brazilian children, adolescents, and street youths. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;53(6):654–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Alavian SM, ZamIran N, Gooya MM, Tehrani A, Heydari ST, Lankarani KB. Hepatitis B vaccination of adolescents: a report on the national program in Iran. J Public Health Policy. 2010;31(4):478–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Alavian SM, Fallahian F, Lankarani KB. The changing epidemiology of viral hepatitis B in Iran. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;16(4):403–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jouneghani AS, Chaleshtori MH, Khoshdel A, Kheiri S, Farrokhi E, Khalafian P, et al. Evaluation of response to hepatitis B vaccine in Iranian 6–18-year-old students. J Res Med Sci. 2017;22:116.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lankarani KB, Alavian SM, Peymani P. Health in the Islamic Republic of Iran, challenges and progresses. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2013;27(1):42–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Rezaee R, Aghcheli B, Poortahmasebi V, Qorbani M, Alavian SM, Jazayeri SM. Prevalence of national responsiveness to HBV vaccine after 22 years of iranian expanded program on immunization (EPI): a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Hepat Mon. 2015;15(5):e23618.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Omland LH, Osler M, Jepsen P, Krarup H, Weis N, Christensen PB, et al. Socioeconomic status in HCV infected patients – risk and prognosis. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:163–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Dean HD, Fenton KA. Addressing social determinants of health in the prevention and control of HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted infections, and tuberculosis. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(Suppl 4):1–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Karimi-Sari H, Rezaee-Zavareh MS, Alavian SM. Street and labour children; special group for elimination of viral hepatitis in Iran. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93(1):38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Beijer U, Wolf A, Fazel S. Prevalence of tuberculosis, hepatitis C virus, and HIV in homeless people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(11):859–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Kandeel A, Genedy M, El-Refai S, Funk AL, Fontanet A, Talaat M. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in Egypt 2015: implications for future policy on prevention and treatment. Liver Int. 2017;37(1):45–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Suthar AB, Harries AD. A public health approach to hepatitis C control in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Med. 2015;12(3):e1001795.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement