Skip to main content

A direct, sensitive and high-throughput genus and species-specific molecular assay for large-scale malaria screening

Abstract

Background

Infectious disease diagnostics often requires sensitive molecular assays that identify at both genus and species levels. For large scale screening, such as malaria screening for elimination, diagnostic assay can be a challenge, as both the throughput and cost of the assay must be considered. The requirement of nucleic acid extraction hampers the throughput of most molecular assays. Co-amplification of multiple species or multiplex identification either can result in missed diagnosis or are too costly for large-scale screening. A genus- and species-specific diagnostic assay with simplified procedure, high sensitivity and throughput is still needed. This study aimed to develop a sensitive and high-throughput approach for large-scale infectious disease screening.

Methods

We developed multi-section Capture and Ligation Probe PCR (mCLIP-PCR) for the direct detection of RNA without extraction and reverse transcription. Multiple tailed sandwich hybridization probes were used to bind at genus- and species-specific sections of the target RNA to cooperatively capture the target onto a 96-well plate. After enzymatic ligation of the bound probes, a single-stranded DNA formed at each section with distinct tail sequence at the ends. They were separately PCR-amplified with primers corresponding to tail sequences for genus or species identification. We applied the method to the active screening of Plasmodium infections of 4,580 asymptomatic dried blood spot samples collected in malaria endemic areas and compared the results with standard qPCR using linear regression.

Results

With multi-section cooperative capture but separate amplification strategy, we accurately identified genus Plasmodium and species P. falciparum and P. vivax without RNA extraction, with favorable sensitivities among the published reports. In the active screening, our method identified all 53 positive infections including two mixed infections, and two P. vivax infections that were missed by standard qPCR.

Conclusions

mCLIP-PCR provides a sensitive and high-throughput approach to large-scale infectious disease screening with low cost and labor, making it a valuable tool for malaria elimination in endemic region.

Graphical Abstract

Background

In clinical microbiology, diagnostics at both the genus and species levels are often required. As an example, Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax are the two most prevalent Plasmodium species responsible for the majority of malaria cases in the world [1]. It is crucial to differentiate these Plasmodium species as they require different therapies. Mixed infections in the same individual are not uncommon. Surveys usually report that about 2% of infections are mixed, or 5–30% with more sensitive detection methods [2]. These mixed infections are often missed in clinical practice leading to incorrect treatments that result in severe consequences [2, 3]. Missed P. falciparum infection results in the risk of developing subsequently severe, possibly fatal disease; while missed P. vivax infection could result in repeated debilitating disease [1, 4]. Therefore, accurate diagnosis at both genus and species level are essential.

Both microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have insufficient sensitivities for low parasitemia (< 100 parasites/μl) and mixed parasite infections [5, 6], with the limit of detection of about 50‒499 parasites/μl for light microscopy, and about 200 parasites/μl for RDT [7]. As a result, poor agreement (69%; kappa = 0.56) among microscopists was reported for the detection of parasites at a low density and mixed infections [8]. Molecular methods are commonly used for species identification, particularly for mixed infections [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. These methods are relatively straightforward when only a limited number of specimens are involved in each run. However, for screening applications involving a large number of samples, such as active case detection for elimination, diagnostic assay can be a challenge as both the throughput and cost of the assay have to be considered [7]. Conventional methods of Plasmodium screening usually contain two testing steps: a genus amplification for the first round of a screening run, and with genus-positives, a subsequent assay for species identification [9, 10, 18]. For example, one study [10] used the widely-used genus-specific primers from a classical nested PCR detection [9] to amplify all plasmodia parasites in the first PCR, followed by separate amplifications of individual species from the first round positive PCR products using nested species-specific primers. For screening operations this 2-tiered approach has the obvious advantage of being most economical. However, for mixed infections, it often misses the identification of minor species, since in the first PCR with the common primers, the predominant species may amplify first and subsequently monopolize the PCR [1, 4, 12]. To overcome this, direct species-amplification is often used where at least one primer is species-specific. Multiplex PCR approaches have been developed [12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20] that allow the detection of several species in one reaction, leading to the simplified work flow. But the multiplex assays always rely on specific fluorescence multi-color probes or agarose gel electrophoresis that may be either too costly or labor intensive for large-scale screenings, especially in resource-limiting situations [9, 21].

For infectious disease screening, nucleic acid extraction remains the most significant impediment to increased throughput and reduced cost and labor. A “direct PCR” approach with no need for DNA isolation has been developed based on genetically modified DNA polymerase that are resistant to polymerase inhibitors in blood [18, 22,23,24,25], facilitating high-throughput analysis of samples collected in the field [24, 25]. However, the proprietary and costly reagents greatly limit its large-scale application; moreover, the modified DNA polymerases may be insufficiently active in the presence of high volumes of blood, the limit of which is sample dependent [18, 25, 26]. This often resulted in reduced sensitivity compared with using purified DNA [24]. The presence of blood in the PCR reaction may also impact downstream real-time fluorescence detection and compromise sensitivity [24, 27, 28].

Inspired by protein immunoassays such as enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), whereby no target purification is required and a sandwich assay is used to capture specific target onto a solid surface for subsequent detection, we previously developed a nucleic acid detection assay called Capture and Ligation Probe-PCR (CLIP- PCR), which bypasses nucleic acid purification and reverse transcription while achieving RT-PCR sensitivity [29]. In CLIP-PCR, oligo probes analogous to capture and detection antibodies bind and capture the target nucleic acid onto solid support. Subsequent PCR serves to exponentially amplify the detection signal, analogous to the enzymatic cascade reaction that amplify the detection signal in immune assays. As a powerful high throughput RNA quantification technology, CLIP-PCR is ideal for first round genus screening, subsequent species identification, however, relies on a separate quantitative PCR (qPCR) starting from DNA extraction from the original blood or dry blood spot (DBS) samples [29]. Also, an overnight incubation step in CLIP-PCR prolongs the turnaround time. Therefore, a rapid, low-cost, high-throughput and sensitive assay for both genus and species screening is still needed.

Unlike proteins, which are mostly globular and compact, nucleic acid targets assume more extended conformations at elevated temperatures and are therefore amenable for sandwich capture at multiple sections of the same target molecule. By simultaneous sandwich hybridization capture at multiple sections of a target molecule, instead of one section only, more efficient capture can potentially be realized. Here we describe a multi-section CLIP-PCR strategy (mCLIP-PCR) to capture both genus and species-specific sequences of target pathogens simultaneously in the same well for subsequent detection. The assay screens for genus Plasmodium infections in the first round; and with positives, continues with species qPCR runs without additional sample processing, and without amplification dropout. The strategy significantly improves the assay efficiency, resulting in a total assay time of about 4 h instead of overnight. Absent of RNA purification and reverse transcription, our assay is fast and convenient as a highly sensitive and high-throughput approach for genus Plasmodium18S rRNA and species P. falciparum and P. vivax 18S rRNA screening with low cost and labor.

Methods

Blood samples

The samples were collected near Lazan City, Myanmar along the China-Myanmar border from March 28, 2017 to May 23, 2017. Local malaria transmission season begins from May to October. DBS (from about 50 μl finger prick blood) from asymptomatic villagers (body temperature less than 37.8 °C) were prepared on Whatman 3MM filter papers according to standard protocol [30], and within 7 days stored with desiccant at − 20 °C. Samples were sent in batches to a screen lab in the Nabang Township Hospital in the adjacent Chinese border town of Nabang in Yingjiang County, Yunnan Province. The DBS samples were dried in the lab at room temperature overnight before test. Blood samples taken from healthy individuals without any travel history to malaria endemic areas were used as negative controls.

DBS sampling and pooling

A 3 mm-diameter disc was punched from the DBS using a handheld metal hole-puncher. To prevent carryover contamination, after each punch the puncher head was dipped with 70% alcohol, flamed over a Bensen burner, and let cooled down before next use. A matrix-pooling protocol [29] were used for sample pooling. Briefly, samples were randomly arranged in sets of M by M matrix, each sample was punched and pooled with samples in the same row, and separately with samples in the same column. Such M-pooled samples were lysed and tested as one sample by mCLIP-PCR first-round genus assay. In this way, each sample was tested once in a row pool and once in a column pool, and a positive sample would give rise to corresponding row pool and column pool positives. Conversely, however, samples at the intersections of positive row pools and positive column pools may or may not be positive (in cases when more than one intersection appear in a positive row or column) and will be tested further, while all others were declared negative. Pooling was done by groups of two individuals, with one performing the punch while the other stood by with careful monitoring, sample tracking and note taking to ensure proper handling.

DNA extraction, standard quantitative PCR (qPCR) and sequencing

DNA was extracted from 200 μl of thawed EDTA-blood or four 3 mm DBSs with the TIANamp Blood or Blood Spots DNA Kits (TIANGEN, Beijing, CHINA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was dissolved in 35 μl ddH2O and quantified with NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA) and stored at – 20 °C. The standard quantitative TaqMan PCR (qPCR) was performed on 40 ng DNA with a LightCycler® 96 (Roche), the genus qPCR primers were derived from the reference [31] and included a forward primer (5′-GTTAAGGGAGTG AAGACGA TCAGA-3′), a reverse primer (5′-AACCCAAAGACTTTGATTTC TCATAA-3′) and probe (5′-FAM-ACCGTCGTAA TCTTAACCAT AAACTATGCC GAC TAG-TAMRA-3′). P. falciparum and P. vivax assays were performed in two separate reactions as reported [32]. At least three positive and negative controls were included to each experiment. Samples with a cycle threshold (CT) ≤ 40 were considered positive.

For species identification by sequencing, DNA was amplified with the genus primers [31], and subjected to Sanger sequencing on an ABI3100 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, USA).

Quantification of human malaria parasites using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)

To determine the analytical sensitivity of the assays, we used serial dilutions of standard samples whose parasite densities were determined by the method of ddPCR [33]. Briefly, DNA was extracted from either a P. falciparum blood culture or a P. vivax blood sample, each sample was partitioned into approximately 10,000 droplets and the 18S rRNA gene was amplified and quantified using probes and primers derived from genus screening [31] on a Bio Rad QX200 droplet PCR system. The number of droplets with amplification product was then measured, allowing for an estimate of template density without the need for a standard curve [33].

Multi-section CLIP-PCR (mCLIP-PCR) for genus and species determination

Sample (three 3 mm-DBS or 72 μl whole blood) was added to a total volume of 360 μl (3 replicates) with 120 μl lysis mixture (Diacurate, Beijing, China), 16.8 μl proteinase K (20 mg/ml), 3.6 μl genus probe mix, 3.6 μl species capture probe mix, 7.2 μl species detection probe mix and water. The whole mix was vigorous shaken (800 rpm) at 56 °C for 30 min, and 100 μl/well was transferred to a 96-well capture plate. After mild shaking (300 rpm) at 55 °C for 30 min, each well was washed for three times with 150 μl wash buffer [0.1 × Saline Sodium Citrate (SSC), 0.1% SDS], followed by addition of 50 μl ligation mix (New England Biolab, Ipswich, USA) for 30 min ligation at 37 °C. The ligated product was heat-released from plate at 90 °C for 1 min, and 5 μl was transferred to a new PCR plate for the genus qPCR run in a total of 25 μl/well containing 1 × SYBR® Premix Ex (Takara) and 100 nmol/L genus primers. For genus positives, another 5 μl of ligation product was amplified in separate P. falciparum or P. vivax qPCR runs in 25 μl/well containing 1 × SYBR® Premix Ex (Takara) and 200 nmol/L corresponding species primers. The assay was performed on a LightCycler® 96 Real-Time PCR System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with the following thermal profile: 95 °C for 30 s, 45 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 20 s. The specific product was defined by melting curve analysis. The sample was considered positive if the melting curve was the same as that of the positive control.

For analyzing the sensitivity of our assays, we used a sample of P. falciparum 3D7 ring-stage synchronized culture and a whole blood sample infected by P. vivax. The parasite density of each sample was first determined by ddPCR. We then took threefold serial dilutions, and each parasite concentration was assayed with three replicates and repeated on three different days to determine the detection limit of the genus and species assays.

To test for potential cross-reactivity of capture probes or PCR primers, we prepared three samples each of P. falciparum (8 parasites/μl), P. vivax (8 parasites/μl), an equal mix of each (as mock mixed infection), and negative control blood. Each sample was lysed to release the RNA targets, which were captured by all hybridization probes (capture probes and detection probes) for genus and species (Fig. 1). After ligation of the bound detection probes, the ligated product was separately amplified by each of the three sets of primers corresponding to the tail sequence of detection probes (genus, species P. falciparum and P. vivax) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Workflow of multi-section CLIP-PCR assay (mCLIP-PCR) for Plasmodium genus and species screening. Dried blood samples are first pooled and lysed. Depicted here is a 10 × 10 matrix-pooling, where samples in the same row are pooled and tested together as one, and so are the samples in the same column. In this way all 100 samples are analyzed twice just by testing Pool A to J and Pool 1–10 (in a total of 20 tests). The released target RNAs from both P. falciparum (Pf) and P. vivax (Pv) are captured to the same well in a 96-well plate via hybridization with oligo probes on multiple sections of each target RNA. Sections include either conserved (“Genus”) or species-specific (“Pf” or “Pv”) sequences of each target RNA. Within each section, probes bind contiguously to the target. Capture Probes (which includes a target-specific sequence and a common tail sequence) at the two ends of a section anchors the target to solid surface by hybridizing the tail sequence with oligos conjugated on the solid surface. After washing, the Detection Probes between the two Capture Probes are ligated to form a single-stranded DNA in each section with both ends having defined sequences as corresponding PCR primer sites. The ligation products are heat-released from the well bottom and 5 μl of which transferred to a new plate for genus PCR amplification using genus-specific primer set (green) and SYBR green chemistry. For the genus-positive sample, additional 5 μl of released ligation product is separately amplified by P. falciparum- or P. vivax-specific primer set (colored orange and red respectively)

We prepared mock mixed infections by artificially mixing infected blood containing P. falciparum and P. vivax at different parasite ratios of 1:1, 1:3, 1:5, 1:7 respectively, each original P. falciparum and P. vivax infected blood contain about 30 parasites per microlitre. These mock mixed infections as well as healthy control blood were analyzed by mCLIP-PCR species assay and by standard qPCR species assay after DNA extraction.

Statistical analysis

The Cq values from mCLIP-PCR and standard qPCR were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Calculations of sensitivity, specificity and agreement between mCLIP-PCR and standard qPCR were done using SPSS 22.0 (IBM, New York, USA); kappa coefficient values express the agreement beyond chance and were calculated with a 95% confidence interval.

Results

mCLIP-PCR for both Plasmodium genus and species detection

Figure 1 illustrates the principle of the mCLIP-PCR workflow. For genus and species Plasmodium detection, we designed different sets of oligo nucleotide probes to 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA, GenBank accession numbers: P. falciparum: M19172.1; P. vivax: U03079.1; P. malariae: AF488000.1; P. ovale: L48987.1; P. knowlesi: L07560.1), targeting conserved regions for the Plasmodium genus and species-specific region for P. falciparum and for P. vivax (Fig. 1 and Additional file 1: Table S1). In addition to target-specific sequence, most probes contain designed “tail” sequences that are independent of the target sequence but can interact with either the solid support or the detection system (Fig. 1). The assay involves first capturing the 18 s rRNA of all five Plasmodium species in the sample to the bottom of the plate well through multi-section sandwich hybridization, followed by probe ligation and genus detection in the first round of qPCR, and species identification in the 2nd round of qPCR. The first-round workflow, from the start of sample lysis to the genus detection result, took about 3 h with minimal hands-on time. Additional species determination took about another 1 h, for a total of 4 h. Prior to the qPCR, the ELISA-like workflow in 96-well plate format involved only rounds of reagent addition, incubation, and wash, without RNA purification or reverse-transcription.

Analytical performance of the genus assay and the species assays

The results of our assays showed the positive melting peak can be clearly distinguished from that of the primer dimer (Fig. 2). The mean of the quantification cycle (Cq) values vs concentration generated linear standard curves with R2 > 0.98 (Fig. 2). To more accurately determine the limit of detection (LOD), we used probit analysis [34]. At concentrations approaching the LODs estimated from Fig. 2, we run additional six samples, each in three replicates in three independent experiments, totaling 54 replicates (Additional file 2: Table S2). The LOD with 95% confidence intervals by probit analysis was 0.011 parasites/μl (0.0086–0.029) for Plasmodium spp., 0.102 parasites/μl (0.078–0.278) for P. falciparum, and 0.783 parasites/μl (0.579–2.234) for P. vivax (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Analytical performance of mCLIP-PCR for both genus and species detection. P. falciparum or P. vivax samples were threefold serially diluted and tested by multi-section CLIP-PCR in triplicates in three independent experiments (9 duplicates total). Representative PCR product melting curves, and the Cq vs parasite concentration plots, were shown for genus (A), P. falciparum (B), and P. vivax (C)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Analytical sensitivity of mCLIP-PCR determined by probit regression. LOD with 95% confidence intervals was analyzed using probit analysis with MedCalc 16.4 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). For each curve a total of 54 replicates were run at each concentration approaching the LOD. The red line depicts the regression curve and the blue line represents the 95% confidence intervals. LOD Limit of detection.

In the test for potential cross-reactivity of capture probes or PCR primers, we found positive specific signals only when the corresponding species was present in the reaction, giving an analytical specificity of 100%. The results of standard qPCR using purified DNA showed the same differentiation.

Singleplex vs multiplex determination of species in mock mixed infections

Assays of all the mock mixed infections showed correct species identification in singleplex assays of mCLIP-PCR and TaqMan qPCR (Additional file 3: Table S3). When we attempted multiplex species amplification of the ligated products with two pairs of primers in one well, two parasites can be simultaneously detected only when the ratio is relatively low (Fig. 4A‒C), and at high concentration ratio only the predominant species can be detected (Fig. 4D). Multiplex standard qPCR on the same series produced similar results (Fig. 4E–H). While it may be possible by PCR optimization to achieve balanced amplification at higher ratios, the possibility that dropout may occur after certain ratio made us decide that the species detection in mCLIP-PCR assay be run individually rather than multiplex.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Multiplex assays of mCLIP-PCR and TaqMan on mock mixed infections. Mixed blood with low concentrations ratios of P. falciparum (Pf) to P. vivax (Pv) were detectable by multiplex mCLIP-PCR (AC) and TaqMan multiplex assays (EG), while at higher ratio only predominant species can be detected (D and H). Solid lines in TaqMan refer to the P. falciparum, while dotted lines refer to P. vivax. The figure is representative of 3 independent experiments

Genus and differential Plasmodium species screening with field samples

We screened 4,580 DBSs collected from asymptomatic donors in malaria-endemic region with a matrix-pooling strategy (Fig. 1). The mean number of DBS per pool (M) was 16 (a 16 × 16 matrix can screen 256 samples in a total of 32 pooling tests). About 576 pools were tested in the first round of genus screening, resulting in a total of 100 individual samples at the intersections of positive row and column pools. These 100 candidate positive samples (which may include positives or negatives) were further tested for Plasmodium genus, P. falciparum and P. vivax infections using mCLIP-PCR and singleplex qPCR. Our mCLIP-PCR identified 14 P. falciparum infections, 35 P. vivax infections and 2 mixed infections (both P. falciparum and P. vivax positive) (Table 1). There were two genus-positive samples at low parasitemia (mean Cq = 36.67 in genus assay) that were not identifiable at species level in our assay, and both turned out to be P. vivax samples by sequencing. All 100 samples were also examined by standard singleplex qPCR after DNA extraction, using genus and species-specific primers and TaqMan probes. The standard TaqMan qPCR, like mCLIP-PCR, also showed higher sensitivity for genus than for species detection, giving four samples that were genus-positive only (Table 1). Compared with mCLIP-PCR, the TaqMan assay failed to identify 2 more P. vivax samples at species level (Table 1) which were confirmed by sequencing. Correlations between Cq values of mCLIP-PCR and Taqman qPCR were high (Fig. 5).

Table 1 Number of samples identified by Plasmodium genus and species assays*
Fig. 5
figure 5

Correlation between mCLIP-PCR and singleplex TaqMan qPCR. The Cq values of the 53 genus-positive samples as determined by genus (A) and species-specific (B) assays of mCLIP-PCR and qPCR were plotted. Redline in B indicates sample negativity in qPCR

In summary (Table 2), for species identification, if we take the results of the concordant samples and the sequencing results of the discrepant samples as the gold-standard [16 P. falciparum (Pf) positives and 84 Pf negatives, 39 P. vivax (Pv) positives and 61 Pv negatives], our mCLIP-PCR assay can diagnose asymptomatic Plasmodium infection with 100% sensitivity and specificity at genus level. At species level, it detected P. falciparum infection with 100% (16/16) sensitivity and 100% (84/84) specificity. For P. vivax infection, it detected at 94.9% (37/39) sensitivity and 100% specificity (61/61). In addition, mixed infection of both species was clearly identified (2/2). The positive and negative predictive values, as well as kappa coefficient of mCLIP-PCR assays are provided in Table 2.

Table 2 The performance of multi-section CLIP-PCR versus qPCR for Plasmodium genus and species assay

Discussion

This report describes a high-throughput, quantitative molecular approach to identify both genus and species Plasmodium RNA directly from blood or DBS without RNA extraction and reverse transcription. Designed for large-scale screening for elimination, the 2-tiered approach uses 96-well plate format in an ELISA-like workflow that can be accomplished in 3–4 h.

The multi-section sandwich approach described in this study enabled cooperative target capture that resulted in not only detection of both genus and species Plasmodium without extraction, but also dramatically accelerated hybridization, cutting down the capture time from overnight to 30 min with similar performance. After capture, all impurities or inhibitors from blood are washed away, without the issue of interfering with subsequent steps, which is a major concern for “direct PCR” approaches using modified polymerase [18, 24, 25]. The limits of detection of our mCLIP-PCR are 0.011 parasites/μl for genus Plasmodium, 0.102 parasites/μl for P. falciparum and 0.783 parasites/μl for P. vivax, which are similar to the sensitivity of RT-qPCR [35] and are among the best in published malaria molecular methods [7, 9, 12, 18, 21, 31, 35,36,37].

In a field screening mCLIP-PCR used only 575 tests to screen a total of 4,580 asymptomatic samples, and identified 53 positives that were confirmed by the standard singleplex TaqMan qPCR, including two mixed infections. In addition, two genus-positive samples with no species signal in TaqMan qPCR were identified as P. vivax by mCLIP-PCR (Table 1), demonstrating better sensitivity of the extraction-free mCLIP-PCR assay than the standard qPCR using extracted DNA in species identification. As a comparison, using “direct PCR” with modified polymerases on malaria field samples achieved only 93% sensitivity compared with using extracted DNA [24].

Mixed infections present a challenge to molecular amplification as template amount from different species may vary considerably [2]. Indeed, our results showed the possibility of false negatives if multiplex amplification is used, consistent with previous studies on mixed infections where only the more abundant parasite is amplified when the concentration ratio is high [10, 12]. One study compared a qPCR method of singleplex species identification [32] with one using co-amplification of all species with genus-specific primers [31] on the same set of 119 samples, and found that in 10 of 14 mixed infections co-amplification only identified the predominant species [38]. Interestingly, both that study [38] and our data (Fig. 4) suggested drop-out of minor species occurred when the species concentration ratio went beyond 5. A possible solution may be multiplex targeting different species with independent primer sets that do not compete for binding to targets. Indeed, such one-tube multiplex qPCR for five human-infecting Plasmodium species has been reported [21, 37]. However potential problems may still exist due to competition for other reagents such as dNTP and enzymes, and/or interaction of different primers and the probes, resulting in lower sensitivity [13, 38, 39]. A study comparing three different methods using gel electrophoresis detection demonstrated that for mixed infections, one-tube multiplex PCR with independent species-specific primer sets is less sensitive than the 2-tiered “semi-nested” PCR where the 2nd PCR is multiplexed, and the latter is less sensitive than the nested PCR where the 2nd PCR is individual singleplex [12]. Thus, to achieve highest sensitivity at lowest cost, we decided on a 2-tiered approach with singleplex amplification in the 2nd round PCR. Importantly, the first genus screening involves only multiplex capture of all species targets but no co-amplification, thus avoiding the problem of minor species drop-off. Finally, the detection is via SYBR green melt curve analysis instead of hydrolysis probes, significantly lowering the cost.

One limitation of this study was that only two species identification were designed in the second round, potentially missing any mixed infection involving Pv or Pf and the three less common species capable of human infection. In our assay, all five species can be expected to be captured by our genus probes. Given the expected low prevalence of the three less common species in most countries, it is not clear whether the benefit of identifying a small number of such rare infections could justify the additional labor, time and cost resulting from extra 3 species tests for every second-round sample. Whether this is practical depends on the local prevalence situations and if necessary, those three malaria species can be detected by our assay by including in the probe mix extra capture hybridization probes specific to those three species, with distinctive tails for additional singleplex amplification in the second round.

Although, as an example, a malaria screen assay was developed in this study, there was nothing in the general methodology that is malaria-specific. The same approach can be used to develop screening assays for any infectious disease agents, provided a target nucleic acid sequence can be identified that contains both a genus-specific portion and a species-specific portion.

Conclusions

We have developed a highly sensitive, high-throughput RNA screening technology that can identify Plasmodium genus and species in 4 h without RNA purification and reverse transcription. The assay in general can be used for large-scale infectious disease screening as a highly-sensitive and high-throughput approach with low cost and labor.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

CLIP- PCR:

Capture and ligation probe-PCR

CP:

Capture probes

Cq:

Quantification cycle

CT:

Cycle threshold

DBS:

Dried blood spot

DP:

Detection probes

ddPCR:

Droplet digital PCR

ELISA:

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

LOD:

Limit of detection

mCLIP-PCR:

Multi-section CLIP-PCR

qPCR:

Quantitative PCR

RDT:

Rapid diagnostic test

References

  1. Ehtesham R, Fazaeli A, Raeisi A, Keshavarz H, Heidari A. Detection of mixed-species infections of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax by nested PCR and rapid diagnostic tests in southeastern Iran. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:181–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayxay M, Pukrittayakamee S, Newton PN, White NJ. Mixed-species malaria infections in humans. Trends Parasitol. 2004;20:233–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McKenzie FE, Bossert WH. Multispecies Plasmodium infections of humans. J Parasitol. 1999;85:12–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartman TK, Rogerson SJ, Fischer PR. The impact of maternal malaria on newborns. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2010;30:271–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Payne D. Use and limitations of light microscopy for diagnosing malaria at the primary health care level. Bull World Health Organ. 1988;66:621–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. WHO. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241547925/en/; 2014. Accessed on 14 Oct 2021.

  7. Britton S, Cheng Q, McCarthy JS. Novel molecular diagnostic tools for malaria elimination: a review of options from the point of view of high-throughput and applicability in resource limited settings. Malar J. 2016;15:88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayalew F, Tilahun B, Taye B. Performance evaluation of laboratory professionals on malaria microscopy in Hawassa Town, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Zhu XP, Jarra W, Pinheiro L, de Rosario VE, et al. High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;61:315–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh B, Bobogare A, Cox-Singh J, Snounou G, Abdullah MS, Rahman HA. A genus- and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60:687–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miguel-Oteo M, Jiram AI, Ta-Tang TH, Lanza M, Hisam S, Rubio JM. Nested multiplex PCR for identification and detection of human Plasmodium species including Plasmodium knowlesi. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2017;10:299–304.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mixson-Hayden T, Lucchi NW, Udhayakumar V. Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao RU, Huang Y, Bockarie MJ, Susapu M, Laney SJ, Weil GJ. A qPCR-based multiplex assay for the detection of Wuchereria bancrofti, Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax DNA. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:365–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee PC, Chong ET, Anderios F, Al Lim Y, Chew CH, Chua KH. Molecular detection of human Plasmodium species in Sabah using PlasmoNex multiplex PCR and hydrolysis probes real-time PCR. Malar J. 2015;14:28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucchi NW, Narayanan J, Karell MA, Xayavong M, Kariuki S, DaSilva AJ, et al. Molecular diagnosis of malaria by photo-induced electron transfer fluorogenic primers: PET-PCR. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e56677.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider P, Wolters L, Schoone G, Schallig H, Sillekens P, Hermsen R, et al. Real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification is more convenient than real-time PCR for quantification of Plasmodium falciparum. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:402–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tajebe A, Magoma G, Aemero M, Kimani F. Detection of mixed infection level of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax by SYBR Green I-based real-time PCR in North Gondar, north-west Ethiopia. Malar J. 2014;13:411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fuehrer HP, Fally MA, Habler VE, Starzengruber P, Swoboda P, Noedl H. Novel nested direct PCR technique for malaria diagnosis using filter paper samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:1628–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moonen B, Cohen JM, Snow RW, Slutsker L, Drakeley C, Smith DL, et al. Operational strategies to achieve and maintain malaria elimination. Lancet. 2010;376:1592–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubio JM, Benito A, Berzosa PJ, Roche J, Puente S, Subirats M, et al. Usefulness of seminested multiplex PCR in surveillance of imported malaria in Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:3260–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reller ME, Chen WH, Dalton J, Lichay MA, Dumler JS. Multiplex 5’ nuclease quantitative real-time PCR for clinical diagnosis of malaria and species-level identification and epidemiologic evaluation of malaria-causing parasites, including Plasmodium knowlesi. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2931–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Echeverry DF, Deason NA, Davidson J, Makuru V, Xiao H, Niedbalski J, et al. Human malaria diagnosis using a single-step direct-PCR based on the Plasmodium cytochrome oxidase III gene. Malar J. 2016;15:128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mens PF, de Bes HM, Sondo P, Laochan N, Keereecharoen L, van Amerongen A, et al. Direct blood PCR in combination with nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay for detection of Plasmodium species in settings where malaria is endemic. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3520–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor BJ, Martin KA, Arango E, Agudelo OM, Maestre A, Yanow SK. Real-time PCR detection of Plasmodium directly from whole blood and filter paper samples. Malar J. 2011;10:244.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kermekchiev MB, Kirilova LI, Vail EE, Barnes WM. Mutants of Taq DNA polymerase resistant to PCR inhibitors allow DNA amplification from whole blood and crude soil samples. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:e40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Z, Kermekchiev MB, Barnes WM. Direct DNA amplification from crude clinical samples using a PCR enhancer cocktail and novel mutants of Taq. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12:152–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Al-Soud WA, Radstrom P. Purification and characterization of PCR-inhibitory components in blood cells. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:485–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Radstrom P, Knutsson R, Wolffs P, Lovenklev M, Lofstrom C. Pre-PCR processing: strategies to generate PCR-compatible samples. Mol Biotechnol. 2004;26:133–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng Z, Wang D, Tian X, Sun Y, Sun X, Xiao N, et al. Capture and ligation probe-PCR (CLIP-PCR) for molecular screening, with application to active malaria surveillance for elimination. Clin Chem. 2015;61:821–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. WHO. WHO external quality assurance scheme for malaria nucleic acid amplification testing: operational manual. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259950. 2018. Accessed on 14 Oct 2021.

  31. Rougemont M, van Saanen M, Sahli R, Hinrikson HP, Bille J, Jaton K. Detection of four Plasmodium species in blood from humans by 18S rRNA gene subunit-based and species-specific real-time PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5636–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perandin F, Manca N, Calderaro A, Piccolo G, Galati L, Ricci L, et al. Development of a real-time PCR assay for detection of Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, and Plasmodium ovale for routine clinical diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:1214–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Koepfli C, Nguitragool W, Hofmann NE, Robinson LJ, Ome-Kaius M, Sattabongkot J, et al. Sensitive and accurate quantification of human malaria parasites using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Sci Rep. 2016;6:39183.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. CLSI. Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; approved guideline—second edition. CLSI document EP17-A2: Wayne (PA); 2012.

  35. Gavina K, Arango E, Larrotta CA, Maestre A, Yanow SK. A sensitive species-specific reverse transcription real-time PCR method for detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2017;2:70–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Veron V, Simon S, Carme B. Multiplex real-time PCR detection of P. falciparum, P. vivax and P. malariae in human blood samples. Exp Parasitol. 2009;121:346–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shokoples SE, Ndao M, Kowalewska-Grochowska K, Yanow SK. Multiplexed real-time PCR assay for discrimination of Plasmodium species with improved sensitivity for mixed infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:975–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bialasiewicz S, Whiley DM, Nissen MD, Sloots TP. Impact of competitive inhibition and sequence variation upon the sensitivity of malaria PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1621–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Whiley DM, Sloots TP. Melting curve analysis using hybridisation probes: limitations in microbial molecular diagnostics. Pathology. 2005;37:254–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants in this study.

Funding

The National S & T Major Program of China Grant (2018ZX10101001), National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant (81271926), the PUMC Scholar fund from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2018-I2M-1-001) and a grant from Oversees Expertise Introduction Center for Discipline Innovation ("111 Center") (BP 0820029) to Z.Z.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YZ conducted most of the experiments, analyzed the data and prepared a first draft of the paper; YZ, YZ and XS participated in the field screening; DW, YS, LF and HW provided the experimental support; and XS provided the operational expertise for the field screening and sample collections; ZZ and XS conceived the study and ZZ was responsible for the technical development and the overall study. All authors took part in the preparation of the final draft of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaodong Sun or Zhi Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the institutional review boards of the Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (#032-2016), and Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases [#2017-(4)]. All the samples were collected with written informed consents.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Table S1.

Probe Sequences.

Additional file 2. Table S2.

Additional tests at low concentration of targets for the Probit analysis.

Additional file 3. Table S3.

Results of genus and species identification of mixed- or single-infection blood samples using singleplex mCLIPPCR or singleplex Taqman qPCR.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Zhao, Y., Sun, Y. et al. A direct, sensitive and high-throughput genus and species-specific molecular assay for large-scale malaria screening. Infect Dis Poverty 11, 25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-022-00948-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-022-00948-2

Keywords

  • Infectious disease
  • Malaria
  • Molecular screening
  • CLIP-PCR
  • Genus
  • Species
  • High-throughput