Skip to main content

Re-emerging threat of Trypanosoma cruzi vector transmission in El Salvador, update from 2018 to 2020

Abstract

Background

Since the late twentieth century, Chagas disease gained global attention to suppress the vector burden as a main control strategy in endemic countries. In Central America, multi-national initiative successfully achieved significant reduction in the estimated disease prevalence as well as elimination of the region’s principal vector species at the time in 2012. While the last decade has witnessed significant changes in ecosystem—such as urbanization and replacement of the main vector species—that can possibly affect the vector’s habitation and residual transmission, the up-to-date vector burden in the region has not been evaluated thoroughly due to the cessation of active vector surveillance. The aim of this study was to update the risk of vector-borne Trypanosoma cruzi infection in El Salvador, the top Chagas disease-endemic country in Central America.

Methods

A nationwide vector survey was conducted in the domestic environment of El Salvador from September 2018 to November 2020. The selection of the houses for inspection was based on expert purposeful sampling. Infection for T. cruzi was examined by microscopic observation of the insects’ feces, followed by a species confirmation using PCR. The data were analyzed using R software version 4.1.3. Proportion estimates with 95% confidence intervals were inferred using the Jeffrey’s method provided under the epiR package.

Results

A total of 1529 Triatoma dimidiata was captured from 107 houses (infestation rate, 34.4%; 107/311) in all the fourteen departments of the country visited within the period; prevalence of T. cruzi infection was as high as 10% (153/1529). In the country, domestic T. dimidiata infestation was distributed ubiquitously, while T. cruzi infection rates varied across the departments. Five out of fourteen departments showed higher infection rates than the average, suggesting sporadic high-risk areas in the country.

Conclusions

Our comprehensive study revealed substantial T. cruzi infection of T. dimidiata across the country, indicating potential active transmission of the disease. Therefore, strengthened surveillance for both vector and human infection is required to truly eliminate the risk of T. cruzi transmission in Central America.

Background

In Latin American countries, the infection of Trypanosoma cruzi predominantly occurs through the contact with contaminated feces of hematophagous triatomine bugs [1]. The vector burden reduction is considered the most effective strategy for Chagas disease control [2, 3]. Over the past decades, international control initiatives have put great efforts to suppress the domicile vector-borne transmission by combining indoor insecticides spraying, housing improvements and health education in many endemic countries [2].

In Central America, the Central American Initiative for Chagas Disease Control was launched in 1997 in coordination with Pan American Health Organization [4]. This multi-national initiative successfully achieved the certified elimination of Rhodnius prolixus in 2012, once considered as a major domestic vector species responsible for human infection [5, 6]. Consequently, the active transmission seemed interrupted in the region considering the reduction of estimated disease prevalence from 7% in the 1998 [4] to 1.3% in 2010 [1, 7]. Once recognized critically endemic, Chagas vector control in Central America is now considered under passive surveillance phase. The surveillance focuses on self-reported vector detection and spraying of residual infesting sites of triatomine bugs [2].

The transition of control program, however, may have resulted in neglecting the expansion of potential vector-borne T. cruzi transmission via emergence of a new vector species in the region: Triatoma dimidiata. This species was once found most prevalent in the sylvatic areas of Central America but now encountered widely in both rural and urban areas. This contrasts to R. prolixus, which was found exclusively in the domestic areas of rural residentials [6]. After the elimination of R. prolixus from Central America, the main contributor to vector-borne transmission has become T. dimidiata. In this study, we aimed to assess current infected vector burden by conducting a nation-wide survey in El Salvador. El Salvador is known to be one of the most endemic countries in the Central American region, with fluctuating seroprevalence around 2% among blood donors from 2001 to 2011 [8].

Methods

Nation-wide survey

Nation-wide active surveillance of the insects in residential areas of El Salvador was conducted between September 2018 and November 2020 by experienced field investigators of Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Salud (CENSALUD, San Salvador) and Ministry of Health of El Salvador. Detailed information of survey sites can be found in the Additional file 1. The selection of the houses for inspection was based on expert purposeful sampling of the field investigators. Briefly, area selection for the survey was based on following two components: (1) the materials of the houses were reported to be adobe, mud wall (“bajareque” in local language), or other natural materials and (2) area where infestation of triatomines was reported by residents through the Ministry of Health. The “man-hour” technique was used for insect collection; a total of one hour (or an hour divided by the number of investigators, if more than two) was spent for triatomine inspection [9].

Vector identification and parasite detection

The insects’ species was determined morphologically by experienced entomologists at the CENSALUD laboratory. T. cruzi infection of the collected insects was determined by the conventional microscopic examination (under 400 ×) of insect feces mixed with normal saline solution. The routine surveillance of infected triatomine vector in the country through the Ministry of Health is completed by microscopic examination, mainly due to the shortage of instruments and resources to perform molecular diagnosis. Therefore, in this study, we adopted PCR diagnosis for molecular confirmation of T. cruzi species for the samples detected as positive under microscopic examination and a subset of microscopic negative samples to seek for the under-reported risk.

DNA extraction and PCR protocol

DNA extraction assay was performed using DNEasy Blood and Tissue kit (QIAGEN, Germany), following the manufacturer’s procedure provided in the kit. Briefly on tissue preparation, approximately 25 μg of tissue from the back of the triatomine was cut with a leaf of new scalpel for each sample. The cut portion of the tissue was placed in a 1.5 ml tube with 200 μl of tissue lysis buffer (Buffer ATL, accompanied in the mentioned kit), followed by maceration with a homogenizer (Bio-Gen PRO200 Homogenizer, Pro Scientific, USA).

The PCR was conducted using 121 and 122 primers (121: 5′-AAA TAA TGT ACG GG(T/G) GAG ATG CAT GA-3′, 122: 5′-GGT TCG ATT GGG GTT GGT GTA ATA TA-3′) targeting specifically the kinetoplast minicircle DNA sequences [10, 11]. Each reaction was performed in a total of 25 μl reaction volume containing 0.5 μmol/L of each primer, 12.5 μl of GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, USA), 5 μl of DNA template, and additional distilled water to the final reaction volume. Briefly, the PCR condition was: 3 min at 94 °C for the denaturation, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C with a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The amplified PCR product was detected at the size of 330 bp in the electrophoresis using 3% of agarose gel.

Data analysis

The data were entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft Corp., USA, 2010) and analyzed using R software version 4.1.3 (The R Development Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria). Proportion estimates with 95% confidence intervals were inferred in defined populations using the Jeffrey’s method provided under the epiR package [12]. This is one of the recommended methods for small-size datasets that provides reliable coverage and whose rationale has been described in detail elsewhere [13].

Results

A total of 1529 triatomines were captured in 107 houses and house annexes of all fourteen departments of El Salvador between September 2018 and November 2020. A total of 311 houses were visited during the period, indicating 34.4% of infestation rate. The materials of 107 houses infested with T. dimidiata were: adobe (56.1%, 60/107), mud wall (16.8%, 18/107), brick (14%, 15/107), and others (13.1%, 14/107) (See Additional file 2 for more details).

Morphological examination revealed T. dimidiata among all the triatomines captured in the study. During the investigation period, 68, 1413, and 48 were captured each year respectively (See Additional file 3 for details of triatomines). 10.0% of T. dimidiata (153/1529) revealed parasite positivity under microscopic examination. All microscopic positive specimens and a subset of 130 T. dimidiata, randomly picked from 1376 microscopically negative T. dimidiata, underwent DNA extraction of the midgut content, and were used as template DNA in the PCR assay. As a result, 100% of microscopic positive specimens revealed molecular confirmation of T. cruzi. In the subset, 6.9% (9/130, 95% confidence interval: 3.7–12.6%,) identified positivity for T. cruzi by PCR. Considering these results, no less than 10.0% of T. dimidiata infested in domestic environment in El Salvador was T. cruzi positive by both microscope observation and PCR, indicating persistent vector-borne transmission risk in the region.

Geographical distribution of microscopic T. cruzi-positive T. dimidiata is shown in the country map (Fig. 1). Five out of fourteen departments showed higher infection rates than average of 10.0%, reflecting sporadic transmission risk in the country.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Trypanosoma cruzi infection rates of Triatoma dimidiata by department. Numbers below the name of each department indicate number of T. cruzi-positive T. dimidiata / total number of T. dimidiata captured in the department during the period of 2018 to 2020. Geographical data was obtained from https://www.diva-gis.org/datadown and depicted using QGIS software version 3.16.8-Hannover (http://www.qgis.org)

Discussion

T. dimidiata, the native triatomine species to the Central American region, was once encountered mainly in sylvatic forests [6]. Since the elimination of R. prolixus, the former vector species, T. dimidiata has enlarged its habitation to domestic areas [5, 6]. As this study warrants, T. dimidiata is now observed ubiquitously, whether urban or rural, in the domestic environment of urban and rural areas of El Salvador. Other studies also show that T. dimidiata, having adapted to the environment change of urbanization in rural areas, may be responsible for the increase in human-vector contact [2, 14]. After all, the emergence of T. dimidiata as the principal vector has become a serious issue in the era of passive vector surveillance. However, the underlying vector burden with the emerging triatomine species, T. dimidiata, has not received enough attention. In fact, once there was plenty of reports on the vector prevalence through program-based surveys in the late 1900s, now few investigations focus to evaluate the current situation of vector-borne risk in the Central American region [1, 15]. From the recent available studies conducted partially in two villages in El Salvador, the infestation rate was less than 10% in 2011 [16]. Our active surveillance nationwide resulted in high infestation rate, possibly resulting from the mentioned purposeful sampling method. In this study, we evaluated the triatomine infection by microscopic observation, followed by molecular confirmation using PCR. Although we observed the submicroscopic T. cruzi infection in triatomine feces, a few percent of potential PCR positivity in microscopic negative samples might have less impact on the surveillance by the microscopic detection since physiological and pathological significance of submicroscopic infection in triatomines are yet to be defined.

Recent spread of immigrants from endemic countries changed the epidemiology of the disease to an emerging health issue in non-endemic countries as well [17, 18]. Many emigrants travel from Central American countries to non-endemic countries every year. Continued vectorial contamination risk in this region shall be recognized as potential health issues even in non-endemic countries [19].

Conclusions

In this study, we analyzed the current potential transmission risk of T. cruzi via emerging vector of the region, T. dimidiata. We conclude that the substantial vector-borne transmission risk still exists in this region; no less than 10% of triatomine bugs are potentially transferable of T. cruzi to humans. Therefore, strong surveillance for both vector and human infection shall be required to eliminate the risk of T. cruzi transmission in Central America. Understanding the prevalence of the T. cruzi infected triatomine bugs in each area is crucial in order to evaluate area-specific risk of vector-borne transmission. With this information, cost optimization of the vector surveillance strategy is possible by targeting the areas with especially high-risk of vector-borne T. cruzi infection, which is a significant consideration in low- and middle-income countries limited of human, material, financial and administrative resources.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

CENSALUD:

Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Salud

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. World Health Organization. Chagas disease in Latin America: an epidemiological update based on 2010 estimates. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2015;90:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moncayo SAC. Current epidemiological trends of Chagas disease in Latin America and future challenges: epidemiology, surveillance, and health policies. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0074-02762009000900005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dias JCP, Silveira AC, Schofield CJ. The impact of Chagas disease control in Latin America—a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0074-02762002000500002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Chagas Disease 2000: Brasilia B& WHO. Control of Chagas disease : second report of the WHO expert committee. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hashimoto K, Schofield CJ. Elimination of Rhodnius prolixus in Central America. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson JK, Hashimoto K, Yoshioka K, Dorn PL, Gottdenker NL, Caranci A, et al. Chagas disease in central america: recent findings and current challenges in vector ecology and control. Curr Trop Me Reports. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-019-00175-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization. Working to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases: first WHO report on neglected tropical diseases. World Health Organization. ‎2010‎. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44440.

  8. Sasagawa E, Guevara de Aguilar AV, Hernández de Ramírez MA, Romero Chévez JE, Nakagawa J, Cedillos RA, et al. Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in blood donors in El Salvador between 2001 and 2011. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8:1029–36.

  9. Monroyi C, Mejia M, Rodas A, Hashimoto T, Tabaru Y. Assesing methods for the density of Triatoma dimidiata, the principal vector of Chagas’ disease in Guatemala. Med Entomol Zool. 1998;49:301–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sturm NR, Degrave W, Morel C, Simpson L. Sensitive detection and schizodeme classification of Trypanosoma cruzi cells by amplification of kinetoplast minicircle DNA sequences: use in diagnosis of Chagas’ disease. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1989;33:205–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seiringer P, Pritsch M, Flores-Chavez M, Marchisio E, Helfrich K, Mengele C, et al. Comparison of four PCR methods for efficient detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in routine diagnostics. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;88:225–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevenson M, Sergeant E, Nunes T, Heuer C, Marshall J, Sanchez J, et al. epiR: Tools for the Analysis of Epidemiological Data. 2022. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/epiR/index.html.

  13. Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Sci. 2001;16:101–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guzman-Tapia Y, Ramírez-Sierra MJ, Dumonteil E. Urban infestation by Triatoma dimidiata in the city of Mérida, Yucatán. México Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007;7:597–606.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sasagawa E, de Aguilar AVG, de Ramírez MAH, Chévez JER, Nakagawa J, Cedillos RA, et al. Acute chagas disease in El Salvador 2000–2012—need for surveillance and control. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109:256–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. María D, Zamora B, Menes HernáNdez M, Torres N, Niga Z, Sosa W, et al. Information to act: household characteristics are predictors of domestic infestation with the Chagas vector Triatoma dimidiata in Central America. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmunis GA, Yadon ZE. Chagas disease: a Latin American health problem becoming a world health problem. Acta Trop Elsevier. 2010;115:14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bern C, Montgomery SP. An estimate of the burden of chagas disease in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1086/605091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramos-Sesma V, Navarro M, Llenas-García J, Gil-Anguita C, Torrus-Tendero D, Wikman-Jorgensen P, et al. Community-based screening of Chagas disease among Latin American migrants in a non-endemic country: an observational study. Infect Dis Poverty BioMed Central. 2021;10:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was a joint investigation of El Salvadorian and Japanese research centers, part of Official Development Assistance from Japan, supported by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). We are thankful to JICA El Salvador as well as Masako Shibata, Ui Yamada and Yoko Hamaguchi for their support. We gratefully appreciate the field surveyors for their technical work. We would also like to thank Prof. Kiyoshi Kita for valuable discussions.

Funding

This research was supported by Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS), Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED, under Grant number JP 21jm0110016 to JNS/YK) and JICA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MSR and YN equally contributed on study design, data acquisition, study implementation, analysis and implementation of data, major contribution to writing, read and approved final version. MC, KS, RG, and AG contributed equally on data acquisition, study implementation, analysis, read and approved final version. Yu Nakagama, YK, and CEA majorly contributed on study conception, study design, study implementation, analysis, implementation of data, substantially revised, read and approved final version. JRP, JER, WM, RCA, and JNS contributed equally on data acquisition, study implementation, read an approved final version. YM, KT, and YO contributed on interpretation of data, read and approved final version. All authors revised and commented on the manuscript and approved the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasutoshi Kido.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests to disclose.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Details of survey area in this study.

Additional file 2.

Wall materials of infested houses observed in this study.

Additional file 3.

Details of triatomines captured in this study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez, M.S., Nitahara, Y., Cornejo, M. et al. Re-emerging threat of Trypanosoma cruzi vector transmission in El Salvador, update from 2018 to 2020. Infect Dis Poverty 11, 89 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-022-01008-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-022-01008-5

Keywords

  • Chagas disease
  • Vector transmission
  • Triatomine
  • Trypanosoma cruzi
  • Triatoma dimidiata