Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

A novel strategy for screening mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Aedes albopictus based on multiplex PCR-mass spectrometry minisequencing technology

Infectious Diseases of Poverty volume 12, Article number: 74 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The current prevention and control strategy for Aedes albopictus heavily relies on comprehensive management, such as environmental management and chemical control. However, the wide application of pyrethroids has facilitated the development of insecticide resistance, primarily via mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) gene. This study aims to develop a novel strategy for detecting mutations in the VGSC gene in Ae. albopictus using multiplex PCR-mass spectrometry (MPCR-MS) minisequencing technology.

Methods

We established a new strategy for detecting mutations in the VGSC gene in Ae. albopictus using MPCR-MS minisequencing technology. MPCR amplification and mass probe extension (MPE) were first used, followed by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing mass spectrometry, which allows the simultaneous detection of multiple mutation sites of the VGSC gene in 96 samples of Ae. albopictus. A total of 70 wild-collected Ae. albopictus were used to evaluate the performance of the method by comparing it with other methods.

Results

Three target sites (1016, 1532, 1534) in the VGSC gene can be detected simultaneously by double PCR amplification combined with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry, achieving a detection limit of 20 fg/μl. We applied this method to 70 wild-collected Ae. albopictus, and the obtained genotypes were consistent with the routine sequencing results, suggesting the accuracy of our method.

Conclusions

MPCR-MS minisequencing technology provides a sensitive and high-throughput approach to Ae. albopictus VGSC gene mutation screening. Compared with conventional sequencing, this method is economical and time-saving. It is of great value for insecticide resistance surveillance in areas with a high risk of vector-borne disease.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Aedes albopictus is a major vector for the transmission of arboviruses, including dengue virus, chikungunya virus and Zika virus [1,2,3]. As one of the most invasive mosquito species with fast breeding and aggressive behaviour [4, 5], Ae. albopictus has successfully expended its presence across more than 70 countries worldwide [6]. Currently, Ae. albopictus is controlled by a combination of biological, chemical and physical methods, and chemical insecticides are primarily used to kill mosquitoes directly [7, 8]. Of these insecticides, pyrethroids are most widely used because of their broad spectrum, high efficiency and low toxicity to mammals [9, 10].

Voltage-gated sodium channels, encoded by the VGSC gene, are the main target of pyrethroid insecticides. Mutations in the VGSC gene could reduce the susceptibility of Ae. albopictus to pyrethroids, resulting in knockdown resistance [11]. The first sense mutation (F1534C) was discovered in Singapore in 2011 [12]. The sequence of VGSC gene loci in Ae. albopictus is determined based on the numbering of sodium channels in Musca domestica [13]. Multiple mutation sites have been found in the VGSC gene in Ae. Albopictus [14,15,16,17,18,19,20], and three of them (1016, 1532, and 1534) have been confirmed to be associated with knockdown resistance [11]. The mutation from GTA to GGA at codon site 1016 results in an amino acid change from valine (V) to glycine (G) [21]. At locus 1532, ATC (isoleucine, I) can be mutated to ATA (isoleucine, I) or ACC (threonine, T) [14]. At locus 1534, the wild-type TTC (phenylalanine, F) can be synonymously mutated to TTT (phenylalanine, F) or nonsynonymously mutated to TCC/TCG (serine, S), TGC (cysteine, C), TTG/CTG/CTC/TTA (leucine, L), CGC (arginine, R), or TGG (tryptophan, W) [12, 16, 18,19,20].

Currently, the detection of mutations in the VGSC gene in Ae. albopictus relies on DNA sequencing or allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR). DNA sequencing is most widely used and considered the gold standard for detecting VGSC mutations. However, DNA sequencing technology is not suitable for studies with a substantial number of samples due to its high cost and time requirements [19]. AS-PCR [19] has also been used to detect mutations in VGSC in Ae. albopictus but is only suitable for single-site detection, with relatively low specificity. Therefore, a rapid, accurate, economical, and multisite detection method for VGSC mutations in Ae. albopictus is an urgent need.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI–TOF MS) is often used to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The main process of this method is to extract DNA from Ae. albopictus and amplify genes containing SNP targets by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPCR). Then, the mass probe is designed to extend the SNP sites detected. Finally, the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of the extended base identified by MALDI–TOF MS is used to determine the base type of the site. This method is also called MPCR-MS minisequencing technology [22]. At present, it is widely used in the clinic (e.g., microbiological testing and analysis) [23] and is very promising for SNP analysis because it can rapidly and simultaneously detect multiple targets [22, 24].

In this study, MPCR-MS minisequencing technology was used to detect 17 genotypes simultaneously at three VGSC gene mutation sites in Ae. albopictus. The established MPCR-MS minisequencing technology method was used to detect the VGSC gene in 70 samples of Ae. albopictus captured in the field, and the reliability of the method was evaluated.

Methods

Specimens and nucleic acids of Ae. albopictus

A total of 13 Ae. albopictus samples were used to establish the MPCR-MS minisequencing technology method. Samples of BJ1 were obtained from the National Institute for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2021. BJ1, the wild-type population susceptible to pyrethroids, served as control mosquitoes in this study (BJ1: V/V, I/I, F/F). The mutated-type or resistant mosquito populations were collected from seven cities (districts) of six provinces in China in 2020: YB2, MS32, LC1, LC7, MS5, YB8, HK33, LY6, SZ48, JN17, LY55, and YB6.

Another 70 wild-collected samples with unknown mutation status in the VGSC gene, sample numbers of HNLY1–HNLY30 and HNXC1–HNXC40, were used to test the performance of the newly established MPCR-MS minisequencing technology method. Sample collection information is provided in Table 1.

Table 1 Aedes albopictus sample collection information
Full size table

DNA was extracted using a magnetic bead microtissue genomic DNA extraction kit (Bioteke Corporation, Wuxi, China). The three studied VGSC mutation sites (1016, 1532, 1534) were sequenced according to published papers [12, 21]. A total of 13 samples were used to establish the MPCR-MS minisequencing technology method for the detection of 14 mutation genotypes (V/G, G/G, I/T, T/T, F/S, S/S, F/C, C/C, F/L, L/L, S/C), as shown in Table 2. The 70 wild-collected samples were used for method validation, and routine sequencing was used to detect VGSC genes in the samples. An additional file shows this in more detail (see Additional file 1).

Table 2 Sites in the Aedes albopictus VGSC gene targeted by first-generation sequencing technology
Full size table

Design of PCR amplification primers and extension probe for VGSC gene variant sites

Primer Premier software (http://www.premierbiosoft.com/primerdesign/) was used for primer design. Two sets of PCR primers were designed to amplify the three VGSC target sites for multiplex PCR (Table 3). The lengths of the primers ranged from 18 to 22 bp, with a 10 bp fixed sequence (ACGTTGGATG) added to the 5' end of each primer.

Table 3 Primer sequences for PCR amplification of Aedes albopictus VGSC gene target sites
Full size table

MALDI–TOF MS quality difference probes for mutation sites were designed by using IntelliBio genetic locus analysis software (V2.0, IntelliBio, Qingdao, China) (Table 4). The length of the mass probe was between 17 and 28 bp. The molecular weight was designed to be 4–9 kDa with a minimal difference of 16 Da between these probes. The probes vg1016, fl15341, sc1534 and fl15342 can be extended in one reaction tube (denoted as tube A), and probes it1532, fl15341-2 and sc1534-2 can be extended in another reaction tube (denoted as tube B).

Table 4 Primer sequences for Aedes albopictus VGSC gene MPE for target site detection
Full size table

Establishment of the MPCR-MS minisequencing technology method

In Ae. albopictus, the analysis method was developed by using the wild-type and mutated VGSC genes as templates. Whole buffer without template DNA served as the blank control (nucleic acid-free water was used instead of template DNA). The operation procedure mainly included DNA extraction, multiplex PCR amplification, mass probe extension (MPE), MALDI–TOF MS data acquisition and QuanSNP analysis. Each probe detection result was collected, the genotype at each site was determined, and then the mutation of the VGSC gene locus could be determined (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Workflow of MPCR-MS minisequencing technology for Aedes albopictus VGSC mutation detection. MALDI–TOF Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight, SNP Single nucleotide polymorphism, VGSC Voltage-gated sodium channel

Full size image

DNA was extracted from the whole tissues of Ae. albopictus using a 96-well magnetic bead micro cell/tissue genome DNA extraction kit (Bio Teke, Wuxi, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was stored at − 20 °C.

The MPCR can simultaneously amplify two DNA fragments, with 1016 sites located in one DNA segment. The 1532 and 1534 sites were located in another DNA sequence. The MPCR instrument was the same as the ordinary sequencing PCR instrument. The MPCR was a 10 μl reaction system, including 2 × EasyTaqPCR Super Mix 5 μl, primers (1016-F, 1016-R, 3234-F, 3234-R) at 10 μmol/L each 0.5 μl, DNA template 2 μl, and ddH2O 1 μl. The reaction conditions were 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; 72 °C for 8 min; and storage at 4 °C.

Shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) digestion was conducted after multiple PCRs to eliminate free deoxygenated nucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs). The reaction system included 5 μl of PCR products and 2 μl of SAP mixture (1.53 μl of ddH2O, 0.17 μl of SAP buffer, 0.3 μl of SAP enzyme); the reaction conditions were 37 °C for 40 min, 85 °C for 5 min, and storage at 4 °C.

MPE was conducted by single-base extension of SAP products and mixed mass probes. The reaction system included 7 μl of SAP digestion products and 4 μl of mass probe mixture (1 μl of E-ddNTPmix, 1.4 μl of mass buffer, 0.6 μl of mass enzyme, 1 μl of mass probe). The reaction conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 52 °C for 5 s, 80 °C for 5 s, and 5 cycles, and then the entire process was repeated for 40 cycles before 72 °C for 3 min and finally stored at 4 °C.

An appropriate amount of resin was added to the MPE product for desalination and purification. First, 14 μl of deionized water was added to each reaction well, and then the resin was added, followed by centrifugation at 1006.2 × g for 1 min to prevent the resin from adhering to the tube wall. The sample plate was mixed with resin in a flip mixer at 10.1 × g for 30 min. After mixing, the sample was centrifuged at 1006.2 × g for 1 min, and the supernatant was tested.

Finally, MPE products were detected by MALDI–TOF MS. The OligoPlate target plate and matrix solution (3-hydroxypyridin-2-carboxylic acid: 3-HPA) were removed, the matrix solution was mixed thoroughly before use, preferably sonicated for 2 min, and a mixture of matrix and sample supernatant was prepared in a 1:1 volume ratio. 3-HPA (1 μl) was dropped at the centre of the sample target. Then, 1 μl of purified supernatant was mixed with 1 μl of 3-HPA. A 1 μl mixture was added onto the substrate target plate and allowed to dry. Then, the crystallized sample was tested using MALDI–TOF MS. The ratio of the mass of charged ions to their charge (m/z) was analysed to distinguish between different probes and probe extensions in the tested substance, and then the base at the extension position was determined. The detection results of the sites were exported as an Excel table.

Details can be found in our previous studies on detecting COVID-19 and Mycoplasma pneumoniae [22, 24].

Determination of the detection limit

The DNA plasmid without mutations in the VGSC gene was synthesized and used to determine the lowest detection limit (LDL) of this method. The DNA plasmid was synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China), and the carrier was pUC57. The primers identified in this study were used for gene synthesis of the amplified sequences, including three mutation sites of the VGSC gene, and a total of 4 μg of dry powder plasmid was synthesized. The original concentration of nucleic acid was quantified and diluted along a six-concentration gradient (2 pg/μl, 200 fg/μl, 20 fg/μl, 2 fg/μl, 200 ag/μl, 20 ag/μl), and other reaction conditions remained unchanged.

Application technology

The established MPCR-MS minisequencing technology method and conventional sequencing method were tested on 70 wild Ae. albopictus collected in Henan Province, China.

Statistical analysis

Excel 2021 (Microsoft, Washington, USA) was used to conduct statistical analysis. Sample detection results were obtained from MALDI–TOF MS in Excel format (Intelligene Biosystems, IntelliBio, Qingdao, China), and then descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

Results

MPCR-MS mini-sequencing-based technology establishment and optimization

The three VGSC target sites (1016, 1532 and 1534) were amplified by double PCR. The original m/z peaks of the seven used mass probes (vg1016, it1532, fl15341, fl15341-2, sc1534, sc1534-2, fl15342) were 5924.8 ± 3.0, 5102.4 ± 3.0, 7162.6 ± 3.0, 6313.2 ± 3.0, 6520.2 ± 3.0, 7210.8 ± 3.0 and 5253.4 ± 3.0, respectively (mass error less than 500 mg/L, the same below; see Additional file 2a). The m/z peaks of the seven probes used in mass probe extension (MPE) were 6221.8 ± 3.0, 6197.8 ± 3.0, 5444.4 ± 3.0, 5375.4 ± 3.0, 7459.6 ± 3.0, 7475.6 ± 3.0, 6655.2 ± 3.0, 6586.2 ± 3.0, 6817.2 ± 3.0, 6833.2 ± 3.0, 6793.2 ± 3.0, 7552.8 ± 3.0, 7483.8 ± 3.0, 7523.8 ± 3.0, 5566.4 ± 3.0, 5526.4 ± 3.0, 5595.4 ± 3.0 and 5550.4 ± 3.0, respectively, and the extended bases were T, G, T, C, T, C, T, C, T, C, G, T, C, G, C, G, A and T (see Additional file 2b). For the blank control without DNA template, peaks in the mass probe extension are given in Additional file 2. c. An additional file shows this in more detail [see Additional file 2].

For a better illustration of Additional file 2, a detailed explanation is given using sample YB2 as an example, as shown in Fig. 2. For site 1016, the wild-type homozygote genotype is GTA/GTA, where the second base T can be mutated into G. The vg1016 probe detection revealed two peaks, corresponding to T and G, respectively, suggesting wild-type/mutant heterozygote GTA/GGA. For site 1532, the wild-type homozygote genotype is ATC/ATC, where the second codon T can mutate into C. The it1532 probe detection result is T, suggesting a wild homozygote (ATC/ATC). For site 1534, the wild-type homozygote is TTC/TTC, and all three bases in this codon have been reported to be polymorphic. The detection result for the fl15341/fl15341-2 probe is T, for sc1534/sc1534-2 is T/G, and for the fl15342 probe is C, suggesting that this locus genotype is a wild-type/mutant heterozygote TTC/TGC genotype. The comprehensive detection results show the specific genotypes of three loci of the VGSC gene in the sample.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Sample (YB2) target site peaks of the mass probe extension. The detection result of the vg1016 probe is T/G. The detection result of the it1532 probe is T. The detection result of the fl15341/FL15341-2 probe is T. The detection result of the sc1534/SC1534-2 probe is T/G. The detection result of the fl15342 probe is C

Full size image

The VGSC gene loci of 13 Ae. albopictus mosquitoes were identified accurately using our MPCR-MS minisequencing technology method, which was confirmed using gene sequencing (Table 5).

Table 5 Detection results of target sites in the Aedes albopictus VGSC gene by MPCR-MS minisequencing technology
Full size table

After optimization, the final concentrations of the seven mass probes were 8.30 μmol/L (vg1016), 6.87 μmol/L (it1532), 10.12 μmol/L (fl15341), 8.91 μmol/L (fl15341-2), 9.22 μmol/L (sc1534f), 10.18 μmol/L (sc1534-2), and 7.15 μmol/L (fl15342).

Detection limit of mPCR-MS minisequencing technology

Figure 3a–c shows the m/z of the seven mass probes without expansion, the peak of the 7 mass probes for the extension target site at different concentrations, and the 7 mass probes with expansion for the blank control, respectively. The detection limits of the seven mass probes (vg1016, it1532, fl15341, fl15341-2, sc1534, sc1534-2, fl15342) were 200 ag/μl, 200 ag/μl, 2 fg/μl, 200 ag/μl, 2 fg/μl, 200 ag/μl and 20 fg/μl, respectively. The total detection limit of all sites in MPCR-MS minisequencing technology was 20 fg/μl when using the diluted concentration of the synthetic DNA plasmids without the VGSC gene mutation (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Detection limit of seven mass probes: a MS peaks of seven mass probes without extension; b the concentration of target site peaks of the mass probe extension. c Blank control, without DNA template target site peaks from the mass probe extension

Full size image

Application of MPCR-MS minisequencing technology

The detection results for 70 samples obtained using MPCR-MS minisequencing technology are consistent with the sequencing results. The genotypes of the three VGSC gene loci in each sample can be correctly identified using our method (Table 6). An additional file shows this in more detail (see Additional file 3).

Table 6 Detection results of target sites in the Aedes albopictus VGSC gene by MPCR-MS minisequencing technology
Full size table

Discussion

Amid the rapid emergence of new mutants of the Ae. albopictus VGSC gene, researchers are trying to develop fast and convenient detection methods in addition to conventional DNA sequencing. The existing technology cannot detect all mutations simultaneously. PCR coupled with first-generation sequencing technology is currently regarded as the gold standard for VGSC mutation detection in Ae. albopictus, which requires two PCRs to amplify the target gene followed by first-generation sequencing. Then, these identified mutation sites need to be manually examined, which is a complicated, time-consuming and high-cost process. In addition, AS-PCR is prone to contamination and has low specificity [19, 25], making it unsuitable for multiple sample detection. In contrast, the MPCR-MS minisequencing technology method that we developed in this study could detect multiple mutation sites in the VGSC gene in 96 samples within seven hours. It can simultaneously detect three mutation sites (loci 1016, 1532, and 1534) and identify the mutant genotype and its corresponding amino acid sequence. This technology has been applied to detect COVID-19 and Mycoplasma pneumoniae [22, 24]. Ae. albopictus is a multicellular eukaryotic organism. Compared with our previous studies, this study included the DNA extraction of Ae. albopictus rather than RNA extraction and the design of primes and probes for the target sites. DNA extraction is relatively simple compared with RNA extraction. Meanwhile, the VGSC mutation sites of Ae. albopictus in this study were less common than mutations studied in other microorganisms, and the design of primers and probes was less challenging.

The method that we developed here has several advantages over traditional methods. First, MPCR-MS mini-sequencing requires fewer PCR products and less sequencing than conventional PCR coupled with sequencing. The conventional PCR system is a 25 μl system [12, 21], while our newly established method is only a 10 μl system, which greatly reduces the consumption of reagents and supplies. The method established in this study greatly reduced the cost of the experiment, which is crucial in less developed countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America [26,27,28], where there are widespread mosquito-borne infectious diseases such as dengue fever, chikungunya and Zika [11]. The low cost and convenience render our method a great application.

This method relies on the detection of mass probes after PCR amplification, which exhibited high accuracy with no misidentification in this study. The samples that we used were one wild-type homozygotes, five wild-type and mutant heterozygotes, four homozygous mutants, and one mutant heterozygote (Table 2). We also applied this method to 70 wild-collected samples. The detection results of all samples are consistent with the sequencing results, suggesting the high accuracy of our method when testing samples. First, the MPCR-MS minisequencing technology detection results showed the base at the measured position after each probe extension, and then the genotype of each VGSC gene mutation site could be determined. Finally, the genotypes of the three VGSC gene loci in each sample could be determined. The genotypes of the three sites were correctly identified according to our judgement rules (Tables 5, 6), which were consistent with the sequencing results. The reliability of the method was verified by the detection samples, which indicated that the method has application value.

Our method also has high sensitivity. Compared with detection methods based on conventional PCR or first-generation sequencing technology, MPCR-MS mini-sequencing requires fewer PCR products while maintaining high sensitivity. We used 20 fg/μl as the LDL of this method. However, the detection limit varies among different probes. For example, the detection limit of fl15341 was 2 fg/μl after mass probe extension, while that of fl15342 was only 20 fg/μl copies. Although these two probes are in the same PCR amplification fragment, our results suggest that the probe extension efficiency of fl15342 was much lower than that of fl15341.

This method can not only detect 17 genotypes at the three sites considered in this study but also be tailored to detect other reported amino acid changes, such as TCG(S), CGC(R) and TGG(W) mutations at the 1534 locus [20]. If the probe detection results of fl15341-2, c1534-2 and fl15342 were T, C and G, then the genotype was confirmed as S/S (TCG/TCG). In addition, this method is extensible and can be used to detect new mutant genotypes at previously identified polymorphic loci. When a new mutation site is discovered, detection can be achieved by adding a corresponding probe to the new mutation site.

However, this method has some limitations. First, the 3'-terminal sequence of the extension probe is fixed, and the quality of the probe is significantly influenced by the base sequence near the detection site [22]. It is found in this study that when the probe is annealed to the template strand, the codon mismatch between the probe and the template strand will lead to inefficient detection. When a mismatch occurs, the closer it is to the detected codon, the more likely it will lead to inefficient detection. For example, when testing the locus 1534 (TCC/TCC) in the MS5 sample, the mutant is homozygous due to the mutation change of the second codon T to C. For the first codon, the probe fl15341 (reverse design) is detected, and the 3'-terminal codon of the probe is A, which mismatches the second codon C of the MS5 sample, leading to a failure of this probe to extend (Additional file 2b MS5-A). To solve this problem, the probe fl15341-2 (forward design) compensates for the lack of probe fl15341 (Additional file 2b MS5-B). Similarly, probe sc1534-2 compensates for the lack of probe sc1534. However, this conclusion is not absolute. For example, when detecting locus 1534 (CTC/CTC) of the SZ48 sample, the sc1534-2 probe was designed in the forward direction, and the 3'-terminal codon was A, which mismatches the first codon C. The second codon T was still correctly detected (Additional file 2b SZ48-B). In short, when the probe is annealed with the template strand, the codon mismatch between the probe and the template strand may lead to inefficient detection. Second, there are TCG(S), CGC(R) and TGG(W) mutations at locus 1534, which were not tested in this study due to the lack of such samples with these genotypes.

Conclusions

MPCR-MS mini-sequencing technology is a novel and simple method for detecting VGSC gene mutations in Ae. albopictus. With the high accuracy, high sensitivity, time savings and economic advantages of this technology, it has great potential in mosquito surveillance, especially in Asian, African, and Latin American countries that are severely affected by insect-borne infectious diseases.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

VGSC:

Voltage-gated sodium channel

MPCR:

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction

MPCR-MS minisequencing technology:

Multiplex PCR-mass spectrometry minisequencing technology

MALDI–TOF MS:

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

AS-PCR:

Allele-specific PCR

m/z :

Mass-to-charge ratio

SAP:

Shrimp alkaline phosphatase

dNTPs:

Deoxygenated nucleoside triphosphates

LDL:

Lowest detection limit

3-HPA:

3-Hydroxypyridin-2-carboxylic acid

References

  1. Benelli G, Wilke ABB, Beier JC. Aedes albopictus (Asian Tiger Mosquito). Trends Parasitol. 2020;36(11):942–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kraemer MUG, Reiner RC Jr, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Gilbert M, Pigott DM, et al. Past and future spread of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4(5):854–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Demok S, Endersby-Harshman N, Vinit R, Timinao L, Robinson LJ, Susapu M, et al. Insecticide resistance status of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes in Papua New Guinea. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomulski LM, Manni M, Carraretto D, Nolan T, Lawson D, Ribeiro JM, et al. Transcriptional variation of sensory-related genes in natural populations of Aedes albopictus. BMC Genomics. 2020;21(1):547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Battaglia V, Agostini V, Moroni E, Colombo G, Lombardo G, Rambaldi Migliore N, et al. The worldwide spread of Aedes albopictus: New insights from mitogenomes. Front Genet. 2022;13: 931163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang S. Genetic diversity of Aedes albopictus in China. CHN CDC. 2013 (in Chinese).

  7. Dalpadado R, Gunathilaka N, Amarasinghe D, Udayanaga L. A challenge for a unique dengue vector control programme: assessment of the spatial variation of insecticide resistance status amongst Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus populations in Gampaha District, Sri Lanka. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6619175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Achee NL, Grieco JP, Vatandoost H, Seixas G, Pinto J, Ching-Ng L, et al. Alternative strategies for mosquito-borne arbovirus control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(1): e0006822.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang Y. Insecticide Susceptibility Status of lab and field populations of Aedes albopictus from Gainesville, Florida, to organophosphates and pyrethroids. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2022;38(3):230–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith LB, Kasai S, Scott JG. Pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: important mosquito vectors of human diseases. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2016;133:1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Auteri M, La Russa F, Blanda V, Torina A. Insecticide resistance associated with kdr mutations in Aedes albopictus: an update on worldwide evidences. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasai S, Ng LC, Lam-Phua SG, Tang CS, Itokawa K, Komagata O, et al. First detection of a putative knockdown resistance gene in major mosquito vector, Aedes albopictus. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2011;64(3):217–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu N. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: impact, mechanisms, and research directions. Annu Rev Entomol. 2015;60:537–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu J, Bonizzoni M, Zhong D, Zhou G, Cai S, Li Y, et al. Multi-country survey revealed prevalent and novel F1534S mutation in voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) gene in Aedes albopictus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(5): e0004696.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou X, Yang C, Liu N, Li M, Tong Y, Zeng X, et al. Knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations within seventeen field populations of Aedes albopictus from Beijing China: first report of a novel V1016G mutation and evolutionary origins of kdr haplotypes. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Marcombe S, Farajollahi A, Healy SP, Clark GG, Fonseca DM. Insecticide resistance status of United States populations of Aedes albopictus and mechanisms involved. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7): e101992.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao JP, Chen HM, Shi H, Peng H, Ma YJ. Correlation between adult pyrethroid resistance and knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) field populations in China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7(1):86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen H, Li K, Wang X, Yang X, Lin Y, Cai F, et al. First identification of kdr allele F1534S in VGSC gene and its association with resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Aedes albopictus populations from Haikou City, Hainan Island, China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2016;5(1):31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu CY, Zhao CC, Wang YG, Ma DL, Song XP, Wang J, et al. Establishment of an innovative and sustainable PCR technique for 1534 locus mutation of the knockdown resistance (kdr) gene in the dengue vector Aedes albopictus. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen H, Zhou Q, Dong H, Yuan H, Bai J, Gao J, et al. The pattern of kdr mutations correlated with the temperature in field populations of Aedes albopictus in China. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kasai S, Caputo B, Tsunoda T, Cuong TC, Maekawa Y, Lam-Phua SG, et al. First detection of a Vssc allele V1016G conferring a high level of insecticide resistance in Aedes albopictus collected from Europe (Italy) and Asia (Vietnam), 2016: a new emerging threat to controlling arboviral diseases. Euro Surveill. 2019;24(5):1700847.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao F, Lu J, Lu B, Qin T, Wang X, Hou X, et al. A novel strategy for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants based on multiplex pcr-mass spectrometry minisequencing technology. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(3): e0126721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jang KS, Kim YH. Rapid and robust MALDI-TOF MS techniques for microbial identification: a brief overview of their diverse applications. J Microbiol. 2018;56(4):209–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao F, Zhang J, Wang X, Liu L, Gong J, Zhai Z, et al. A multisite SNP genotyping and macrolide susceptibility gene method for Mycoplasma pneumoniae based on MALDI-TOF MS. iScience. 2021;24(5): 102447.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pichler V, Mancini E, Micocci M, Calzetta M, Arnoldi D, Rizzoli A, et al. A novel allele specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) assay to detect the V1016G knockdown resistance mutation confirms its widespread presence in Aedes albopictus populations from Italy. Insects. 2021;12(1):79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Faraji A, Unlu I. The eye of the tiger, the thrill of the fight effective larval and adult control measures against the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Diptera Culicidae), in North America. J Med Entomol. 2016;53(5):1029–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tandina F, Doumbo O, Yaro AS, Traoré SF, Parola P, Robert V. Mosquitoes (Diptera Culicidae) and mosquito-borne diseases in Mali, West Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bamou R, Mayi MPA, Djiappi-Tchamen B, Nana-Ndjangwo SM, Nchoutpouen E, Cornel AJ, et al. An update on the mosquito fauna and mosquito-borne diseases distribution in Cameroon. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants in this study.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2018ZX10101002-002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, 102206, People’s Republic of China

    Qunzheng Mu, Xin Zhao, Wenyu Li, Xinchang Lun, Yiguan Wang, Dongdong Hua, Qiyong Liu, Di Xiao & Fengxia Meng

  2. Weifang No. 2 People’s Hospital, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Qunzheng Mu

  3. Weifang Medical College, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Fengfeng Li

  4. Beijing Daxing District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, 102600, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Xinxin Zhou

Authors
  1. Qunzheng Mu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fengfeng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenyu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xinxin Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xinchang Lun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yiguan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dongdong Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Qiyong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Di Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Fengxia Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Data acquisition, QZM, XZ, FFL, XXZ, XCL, WYL, DDH, and FXM. Data sorting and analysis, QZM. Funding acquisition, DX and XMF. Methodology, software, QZM. Supervision, FXM, YGW and QYL. Draft writing, QZM. Writing—review and editing, YGW, XZ, DX and FXM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. QZM and XZ contributed equally to this work. Author order was determined both alphabetically and in order of increasing seniority.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Di Xiao or Fengxia Meng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was supported by the Ethical Review Committee of the Institute for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (No. ICDC-202304).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

The routine sequencing was used to detect VGSC genes in 70 wild-collected samples.

Additional file 2.

A total of 13 samples were used to establish the MPCR-MS minisequencing technology. MS peaks of the MPE probes.

Additional file 3.

The detection results of 70 samples using MPCR-MS minisequencing technology.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mu, Q., Zhao, X., Li, F. et al. A novel strategy for screening mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Aedes albopictus based on multiplex PCR-mass spectrometry minisequencing technology. Infect Dis Poverty 12, 74 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-023-01122-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-023-01122-y

Keywords

Infectious Diseases of Poverty

ISSN: 2049-9957

Contact us