Open Access

Assessment of research productivity of Arab countries in the field of infectious diseases using Web of Science database

  • Waleed M Sweileh1Email author,
  • Samah W Al-Jabi2,
  • Alaeddin Abuzanat3,
  • Ansam F Sawalha1,
  • Adham S AbuTaha1,
  • Mustafa A Ghanim4 and
  • Sa’ed H Zyoud2
Infectious Diseases of Poverty20154:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-9957-4-2

Received: 27 August 2014

Accepted: 22 December 2014

Published: 2 February 2015

Abstract

Background

To meet the future challenges of infectious diseases and limit the spread of multidrug resistant microorganisms, a better understanding of published studies in the field of infectious diseases is needed. The objective of this study was to analyze the quantity and quality of research activity in the field of infectious diseases in Arab countries and compare it with that in non-Arab countries.

Methods

Documents published in Arab countries within the research category of “infectious diseases” were extracted and analyzed using the Web of Science database. The data analyzed represent research productivity during the time interval between 1900 – 2012.

Results

Worldwide, the total number of documents published in the field of infectious diseases up to 2012 was 227,188. A total of 2,408 documents in the field of infectious diseases were published in Arab countries, which represents 1.06% of worldwide research output. Research output from Arab countries in the field of infectious diseases was low for decades. However, approximately a five-fold increase was observed in the past decade. Arab countries ranked 56th to 218th on the standard competition ranking (SCR) in worldwide publications in the field of infectious diseases. Egypt, with a total publication of 464 (19.27%) documents ranked first among Arab countries, while Kuwait University was the most productive institution with a total of 158 (6.56%) documents. Average citation per document published in Arab countries was 13.25 and the h-index was 64. Tuberculosis (230; 9.55%), malaria (223; 9.26%), and hepatitis (189; 7.8%) were the top three infectious diseases studied as according to the retrieved documents.

Conclusion

The present data reveals that some Arab countries contribute significantly to the field of infectious diseases. However, Arab countries need to work harder to bridge the gap in this field. Compared with non-Arab countries in the Middle East, research output from Arab countries was high, but more efforts are needed to enhance the quality of this output. Future research in the field should be encouraged and correctly directed.

Keywords

Bibliometric Infectious diseases Arab world Web of science

Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file 1 for translation of the abstract into the six official working languages of the United Nations.

Background

According to the Arab Union League, there are 22 independent Arab states with more than 400 million inhabitants. Poverty, inadequate health services, political instability, and outbreaks of infectious diseases are common in many Arab countries [13]. For example, there was an outbreak of polio in Syria that made international agencies call for a ceasefire to accomplish a polio vaccination campaign [4]. Another example is the cholera outbreak in Baghdad after the second Gulf War [5]. In Saudi Arabia, several mortalities have been attributed to Middle East respiratory syndrome caused by the coronavirus infection [68]. Furthermore, pilgrimage and other religious seasons create a true challenge for Saudi Arabia to prevent and control outbreaks of infectious diseases during religious seasons [911]. Different types of infectious diseases are prevalent and have become a health burden for governments in many Arab countries. For example, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), in conservative communities that Arab countries fall into, HIV infections are rising at a faster rate, while the coverage of antiretroviral therapy is the lowest [12]. Furthermore, highly pathogenic and serious viral infections such as the avian flu virus, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C are important risks of morbidity and mortality, and pose real threats in some Arab countries such as Egypt [1317]. Similarly, serious parasitic infections such as malaria, schistosomiasis, and trypanosomiasis constitute a major health, social, and economic challenge in Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, and other Arab countries [1823]. Zoonotic infections, such as brucellosis and hydatid disease, are also present in several Arab countries and pose a continuous health challenge [2428]. Furthermore, some infectious diseases such as nematode infections, filarial infections, schistosomiasis, fascioliasis, leprosy, and trachoma are endemic in some Arab countries and are being neglected [29]. In addition to the abovementioned challenges pertaining to infectious diseases, there is evidence that serious and common infectious agents in the Arab region, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, and some gram-negative bacilli are developing multiple drug resistance which is a real future public health challenge at regional and global levels [3038].

To meet future challenges regarding infectious diseases and limit the spread of multidrug resistant microorganisms in Arab countries, a better understanding of published studies in the field of infectious diseases is needed to have baseline data in this field so that future research can be encouraged and correctly directed. No bibliometric studies have addressed microbiological, or parasitological or viral or infectious diseases research activity in the Arab region. Most bibliometric studies in Arab countries have focused on biomedical research in general or on other medical areas [39, 40]. Therefore, this study was carried out to investigate the quantity and quality of research activity in Arab countries in the field of infectious diseases. This bibliometric study assessed the past and current research activity in Arab countries in the field of infectious diseases, in order to draw future attention to research in this field.

Methods

The Web of Science (WoS) database was used to achieve the objective of this study. The WoS is a trustworthy, large, and powerful database for literature retrieval and analysis [41]. All Arab countries: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Morocco, Tunisia, Syrian Arab Republic (SAR), United Arab Emirates (UAE), Iraq, Sudan, Yemen, Algeria, Comoros, Djibouti, Libya, Mauritania, Oman, Somalia, and Palestine, were used as the country keys, followed by “infectious diseases,” which was used as the WoS category. Because WoS does not recognize Palestine as an independent state yet, search for documents about infectious diseases from Palestine was carried out using separate search keys in the database.

The search keys for the 21 Arab countries looked like this: (CU = (Jordan) OR CU = (Iraq) OR CU = (Syria) OR CU = (Saudi) OR CU = (Kuwait) OR CU = (Egypt) OR CU = (Yemen) OR CU = (Qatar) OR CU = (Emirates) OR CU = (Bahrain) OR CU = (Oman) OR CU = (Sudan) OR CU = (Tunisia) OR CU = (Algeria) OR CU = (Lebanon) OR CU = (Libya) OR CU = (Morocco) OR CU = (Somalia) OR CU = (Djibouti) OR CU = (Comoros) OR CU = (Mauritania)) AND WC = (infectious diseases). The search keys for Palestine looked like this: WC = (infectious diseases) AND CI = ((Nablus) OR (Jenin) OR (Ramallah) OR (Bethlehem) OR (Tulkarm) OR (Abu Dis) OR (Gaza)) AND CU = (Israel). The search for Palestinian research output in infectious diseases was based on the list of major Palestinian cities as a key research in addition to the name of Israel as a country since the WoS does not recognize Palestine as a state and considers all Palestinian publications to be affiliated with Israel.

The results from 21 Arab countries and those from Palestine were combined and the resultant data were analyzed. To increase the accuracy of the results, research was refined and limited to original research articles and review articles because they represent actual research activities, while other types of documents such as editorials, conference proceedings, and others were excluded. The timeframe for the results included all years up to 2012. The years 2013 and 2014 were excluded in order to enhance the accuracy of the results. If we included recent years, then we might not be able to retrieve the same number of documents if we re-do the analysis several months later because some journal issues are released and uploaded to WoS several months after publication online.

The WoS generates a count of the total number of original articles, total citations, and the value of the h-index. Scientific output was evaluated based on a methodology developed and used in other bibliometric studies [4247]. The collected data were used to generate the following information: (a) total and trends of contributions in infectious diseases research up until the specified date of December 31, 2012; (b) Arab countries research productivity; (c) journals in which researchers from the Arab world were published; (d) h-index for retrieved publications from Arab countries; and finally (e) comparison of the results obtained from Arab countries with those obtained from non-Arab countries such as Turkey, Iran, and Israel.

Statistical analysis

Data from WoS were exported to a Microsoft Office® Excel spreadsheet and then transferred to a Microsoft Word document. Results were converted to rank order using the standard competition ranking (SCR). We took into consideration the top 10 ranked publications in each item. If the measurements of bibliometric analysis had the same ranking number, then a gap was left in the ranking numbers which followed. The journal’s impact factors (IF) were evaluated using the Journal Citation Report® (JCR; Web of Science) 2012 science edition, published by Thomson Reuters (New York, NY, USA).

Results

The total number of worldwide documents retrieved from WoS using the methodology stated and without specifying the name of any country was 227,188. When the same methodology was applied using the list of Arab countries, 2,408 documents were retrieved. Therefore, research output from Arab countries in the field of infectious diseases represents 1.06% of worldwide research productivity. Table 1 lists the Arab countries and their standard competition rank (SCR) worldwide. In the same table, three non-Arab Middle Eastern countries are shown for comparative purposes.
Table 1

List of Arab countries and three non-Arab countries in the Middle East and their Standard Competition Ranks (SCRs) in worldwide research productivity in the field of infectious diseases

Arab Countries

Worldwide SCR *

Egypt

56

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

60

Tunisia

68

Morocco

81

Kuwait

91

Lebanon

93

Sudan

86

Algeria

103

United Arab Emirates

105

Jordan

130

Qatar

136

Bahrain

143

Oman

157

Iraq

163

Syria

162

Yemen

175

Libya

170

Mauritania

177

Palestine

N/A*

Somalia

210

Comoros

213

Djibouti

218

Non-Arab countries

 

Israel

25

Turkey

31

Iran

46

*Palestine is not recognized as an independent state in the WoS database, so rank could not be determine. Retrieval of documents from Palestine was explained in the methodology section.

The top 10 journals for publication of documents in the field of infectious diseases from Arab countries are shown in Table 2. Approximately 8.5% of documents from Arab countries in the field of infectious diseases were published in journals with an IF > 5. In terms of worldwide documents, approximately 21.5% were published from journals with an IF > 5.
Table 2

Top 10 journals in which documents in the field of infectious diseases were mostly published from Arab countries

SCR a

Journal

Frequency N = 2408 (%)

IF b

1st

Medecine et Maladies Infectieuses

202 (8.39)

0.753

2nd

Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique

138 (5.73)

NA

3nd

Journal of Infectious Diseases

127 (5.27)

5.848

4th

International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

115 (4.78)

2.610

5th

Journal of Infection in Developing Countries

98 (4.07)

0.996

6th

Emerging Infectious Diseases

80 (3.32)

5.993

7th

Journal of Infection

77 (3.20)

4.073

8th

Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

73 (3.03)

2.260

9th

Infection and Immunity

69 (2.87)

4.074

10th

International Journal of Antimicrobial agents

67 (2.78)

4.415

10th

International Journal of Infectious Diseases

67 (2.78)

2.357

Abbreviations: SCR Standard Competition Ranking, NA not available, IF impact factor.

aIf equal journals have the same ranking number, then a gap is left in the ranking numbers.

bThe impact factor was reported according to the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) journal citation reports (JCR) 2012.

The annual number of worldwide published documents was low up until 1970. A steady and obvious increase was seen after that. Growth of research in the field of infectious diseases worldwide and from Arab countries is shown in Figure 1. The figure presents the data from the 1960s to 2012. Data earlier than 1960 was excluded because the number of published documents before 1960 was relatively low. Both worldwide and Arab countries have shown a dramatic increase in research productivity in infectious diseases over time. The annual number of documents published in Arab countries indicated that research output in the field remained low until the mid-1980s and showed a great jump in the late 1990s. The first article published in the field of infectious diseases in Arab countries was co-authored by an Arab researcher from Egypt in 1928 [48]. The majority of documents retrieved from Arab countries were published in English (2,087; 86.66%), followed by French (311; 12.92%), and very few were published in Russian, Spanish, and German (10; 0.42%).
Figure 1

Growth of research productivity in the field of infectious diseases. The □ line represents worldwide growth while the line represents growth of research in Arab countries.

When the retrieved documents were analyzed by country, Egypt (464; 19.27%) had the highest research output, followed by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (437; 18.15%) and Tunisia (365; 15.16%) (see Table 3). All Arab countries, even those with low income and/or political instability such as Palestine, had some contribution to the field of infectious diseases research. The most research productive institute was Kuwait University followed by the American University in Beirut, with 158 (6.56%) and 139 (5.78%) documents, respectively. Researchers in Arab countries collaborated most with researchers from the USA (475; 19.73%), France (257; 10.67%), and England (162; 6.73%).
Table 3

Research productivity of Arab and three non-Arab countries in the field of infectious diseases, including the h-index and mean citation per document

Arab country

Frequency N = 2408 (%)

h-index

Mean citation per document

Egypt

464 (19.27)

41

16.08

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

437 (18.15)

36

15.64

Tunisia

365 (15.16)

25

8.89

Morocco

216 (8.97)

22

9.96

Kuwait

175 (7.27)

27

17.61

Lebanon

173 (7.18)

24

14.14

Sudan

165 (6.85)

28

16.28

Algeria

134 (5.57)

16

8.06

United Arab Emirates

128 (5.32)

27

19.98

Jordan

79 (3.28)

16

12.81

Qatar

55 (2.28)

11

7.58

Bahrain

44 (1.83)

11

9.82

Oman

34 (1.41)

9

8.47

Iraq

29 (1.20)

8

11.03

Syria

29 (1.20)

10

8.21

Yemen

23 (0.96)

6

5.62

Libya

22 (0.91)

8

9.64

Mauritania

19 (0.79)

8

10.00

Palestine

11 (0.46)

4

4.91

Somalia

6 (0.25)

4

12.33

Comoros

6 (0.25)

4

5.17

Djibouti

5 (0.21)

4

8.00

Non-Arab Countries versus 22 Arab Countries

“non-Arab countries”

2,408

64

13.25

Israel

2,095

93

24.11

Turkey

1,461

53

12.77

Iran

572

29

9.04

Of the 2,408 documents considered for the h-index, 64 had been cited at least 64 times at the time of the data analysis. Analysis of citation revealed that the Arab country with the highest h-index was Egypt (h-index = 41), while the country with the highest mean citation per document was the United Arab Emirates (20 citations per document). Compared with other non-Arab countries in the Middle East, the research output from Arab countries was higher than that from Israel, Turkey, and Iran. However, the quality of research output from Arab countries, measured as h-index, was less than that from Israel but higher than that from Turkey or Iran (see Table 3). The top infectious diseases studied as per the retrieved published documents were: tuberculosis (230; 9.55%), malaria (223; 9.26%), hepatitis (189; 7.8%), HIV (186; 7.72%), diarrhea/gastroenteritis (150; 6.23%), meningitis (115; 4.78%), leishmaniasis (111; 4.6%), salmonella (92; 3.82%), and influenza (52; 2.16%).

Discussion

In this study, we assessed research productivity in the field of infectious diseases in Arab countries. Our results indicated that there is an obvious and promising rise in research activity in Arab countries in this field. However, none of the Arab countries ranked among the first 50 countries in terms of worldwide contribution to research output in this field. This was disappointing given that three non-Arab Middle Eastern countries—Israel, Iran, and Turkey—were ranked among the first top 50 countries. Among the Arab countries, Egypt and KSA occupied the top rank. Large populations and high national incomes are the most probable reasons for this. Compared with non-Arab countries in the Middle East, the number of published research documents in Arab countries was the highest. However, the quality of the published documents in Arab countries, as measured by the h-index and/or average citation per document, was lesser than that from Israel possibly because of the relatively low impact factor (IF) of journals in which the bulk of the documents from Arab countries were published. The citation is a key indicator of research quality [49]. The h-index was developed to overcome the main disadvantages of other bibliometric indicators, such as total number of papers or total number of citations. The h-index simultaneously measures the quality and quantity of scientific output, and is one of the most commonly used indicators of research quality. However, if the h-index is used to measure documents from different databases, then this can give different values. Therefore, each database has pros and cons when being measured by the h-index [5052]. Criticisms have also been addressed to the use of the h-index as a marker of publication quality and citation. For example, the h-index does not consider the context of citations or the number of authors in the document, and gives equal values for book citation and research citations. Therefore, the h-index has a lesser predictive accuracy and precision than measuring using mean citations per paper, although this is controversial [53, 54].

Infectious diseases have no borders and prevention; control and eradication of infectious diseases requires worldwide efforts. Arab countries have been the source of some fatal infectious diseases, and they should heavily participate and cooperate in research in order to combat them [5558]. For example, the Middle East respiratory syndrome was initially diagnosed in KSA but reports of cases in distant parts of the world have been identified due to people traveling from KSA [5962]. Several research documents about serious infectious agents such as the West Nile Virus have been published in the USA and Europe through cooperation with Arab institutions and investigators [63, 64]. Arab countries should also cooperate in research regarding resistant cases of infectious agents particularly those pertaining to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Emergence of resistant strains causing tuberculosis is a challenge for many developing countries [65]. Another important example of an infectious disease common in Arab countries that has been investigated through several cooperative research studies is leishmaniasis [6668]. Cooperation in research becomes evident when we compare research interests of Arab investigators with those in other countries. Research collaboration improves the quality and quantity of research output, as well as the visibility of national health problems [6972]. Furthermore, international collaboration in research helps in capacity building in developing countries and makes national problems of developing countries more observable [73]. Arab researchers need to take the lead and promote research projects in the field of infectious diseases as an important public health concern. Obstacles to do research such as inadequate funding, an unstable democratic atmosphere, and an unclear national policy toward health research are, unfortunately, prevalent in Arab countries. Everyone should participate in the war against infectious diseases including clerks and politicians who can help in the fight of infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS [74, 75]. Researchers, academics, and healthcare professionals should promote vaccinations against infectious diseases as well as public hygiene as a methods of early prevention [76, 77]. Research output from a particular country is not only a point of prestige but also a reflection of the care of governments toward citizens and their individual health. Of course, the research activity and capacity of a particular country depends on several factors including the national income and the size of the population. However, in the case of infectious diseases, Arab countries, with a population of over 400 million and huge resources, must strive for excellence in research pertaining to infectious diseases. In addition, Arab countries need to invest in research in infectious diseases to limit the spread of microbial drug resistance that might be unique in different world regions. To achieve this, Arab countries must invest more in research activity in the field of infectious diseases.

Our study is the first to analyze the quantity and quality of research productivity in the field of infectious diseases in Arab countries. The database used for analysis, Web of Science (WoS), is one of the most trustworthy databases that allows for powerful citation analysis. It is well known that the most leading and influential journals in the field of medicine and health are indexed in WoS. However, articles published in non-WoS indexed journals were not included in the analysis. Despite this, the aim of this paper was to initiate discussion among professionals and academics pertaining to infectious diseases research activity in Arab countries rather than criticize or praise the research activity itself.

Conclusion

Our study showed that research in the field of infectious diseases is rising in some Arab countries such as Egypt and KSA, and that more efforts are required to bridge the gap with some of the other countries. Research collaboration between institutions in Arab countries with international researchers and institutions in the field of infectious diseases should be sought. Governmental funding and support for infectious diseases research is also recommended.

Abbreviations

WoS: 

Web of Science

KSA: 

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

USA: 

United States of America

JCR: 

Journal citation report

SCR: 

Standard competition ranking

IFs: 

Impact factors.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express gratitude to the An-Najah University for help in conducting this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University
(2)
Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University
(3)
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University
(4)
Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University

References

  1. Batniji R, Khatib L, Cammett M, Sweet J, Basu S, Jamal A, Wise P, Giacaman R: Governance and health in the Arab world. Lancet 2014, 383:343–355. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62185-6View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jabbour S, Giacaman R, Yamout R, Khawaja M: Public health in the Arab World. Cambridge University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  3. Mokdad AH, Jaber S, Aziz MI, AlBuhairan F, AlGhaithi A, AlHamad NM, Al-Hooti SN, Al-Jasari A, AlMazroa MA, AlQasmi AM, et al.: The state of health in the Arab world, 1990–2010: an analysis of the burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. Lancet 2014, 383:309–320. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62189-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arie S: Polio outbreak leads to calls for a “vaccination ceasefire” in Syria. BMJ 2013, 347:f6682. 10.1136/bmj.f6682View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Khwaif J, Hayyawi A, Yousif T: Cholera outbreak in Baghdad in 2007: an epidemiological study. East Mediterr Health J 2010, 16:584–589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Memish ZA, Zumla AI, Al-Hakeem RF, Al-Rabeeah AA, Stephens GM: Family cluster of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infections. N Engl J Med 2013, 368:2487–2494. 10.1056/NEJMoa1303729View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Assiri A, Al-Tawfiq JA, Al-Rabeeah AA, Al-Rabiah FA, Al-Hajjar S, Al-Barrak A, Flemban H, Al-Nassir WN, Balkhy HH, Al-Hakeem RF: Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 2013, 13:752–761. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70204-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Al-Ahdal MN, Al-Qahtani AA, Rubino S: Coronavirus respiratory illness in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Dev Ctries 2012, 6:692–694.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shibl A, Senok A, Memish Z: Infectious diseases in the Arabian Peninsula and Egypt. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012, 18:1068–1080. 10.1111/1469-0691.12010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Al-Tawfiq JA, Memish ZA: The Hajj: updated health hazards and current recommendations for 2012. Euro Surveill 2012, 17:6–10.Google Scholar
  11. Mandourah Y, Al-Radi A, Ocheltree AH, Ocheltree SR, Fowler RA: Clinical and temporal patterns of severe pneumonia causing critical illness during Hajj. BMC Infect Dis 2012, 12:117. 10.1186/1471-2334-12-117View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Alwan A: Responding to priority health challenges in the Arab world. Lancet 2014, 383:284–286. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62572-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Aamir U, Wernery U, Ilyushina N, Webster R: Characterization of avian H9N2 influenza viruses from United Arab Emirates 2000 to 2003. Virology 2007, 361:45–55. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.037View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Abdelwhab EM, Hafez HM: An overview of the epidemic of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus in Egypt: epidemiology and control challenges. Epidemiol Infect 2011, 139:647–657. 10.1017/S0950268810003122View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gasim GI, Murad IA, Adam I: Hepatitis B and C virus infections among pregnant women in Arab and African countries. J Infect Dev Ctries 2013, 7:566–578.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mohamoud YA, Mumtaz GR, Riome S, Miller D, Abu-Raddad LJ: The epidemiology of hepatitis C virus in Egypt: a systematic review and data synthesis. BMC Infect Dis 2013, 13:288. 10.1186/1471-2334-13-288View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Daw MA, Dau AA: Hepatitis C virus in Arab world: a state of concern. ScientificWorldJournal 2012, 2012:719494.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Adam I, Elhassan EM, Haggaz AD, Ali AAA, Adam GK: A perspective of the epidemiology of malaria and anaemia and their impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes in Sudan. J Infect Dev Ctries 2011, 5:83–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Awofeso N: Towards global Guinea worm eradication in 2015: the experience of South Sudan. Int J Infect Dis 2013, 17:E577-E582. 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.03.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hassan OA, Ahlm C, Sang R, Evander M: The 2007 Rift Valley Fever Outbreak in Sudan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011, 5:e1229. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001229View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruiz-Postigo JA, Franco JR, Lado M, Simarro PP: Human African Trypanosomiasis in South Sudan: How Can We Prevent a New Epidemic? PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012, 6:e1541. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001541View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramsay A, Al-Agbhari N, Scherchand J, Al-Sonboli N, Almotawa A, Gammo M, Gauchan P, Yassin MA, Cuevas LE: Direct patient costs associated with tuberculosis diagnosis in Yemen and Nepal. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2010, 14:165–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sady H, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Mahdy MAK, Lim YAL, Mahmud R, Surin J: Prevalence and Associated Factors of Schistosomiasis among Children in Yemen: Implications for an Effective Control Programme. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013, 7:e2377. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002377View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Balkhy HH, Memish ZA: Rift Valley fever: an uninvited zoonosis in the Arabian peninsula. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003, 21:153–157. 10.1016/S0924-8579(02)00295-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nemenqani D, Yaqoob N, Khoja H: Breast Brucellosis in Taif, Saudi Arabia: cluster of six cases with emphasis on FNA evaluation. J Infect Dev Ctries 2009, 3:255–259.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Al-Majali AM, Shorman M: Childhood brucellosis in Jordan: prevalence and analysis of risk factors. Int J Infect Dis 2009, 13:196–200. 10.1016/j.ijid.2008.06.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Samaha H, Al-Rowaily M, Khoudair RM, Ashour HM: Multicenter Study of Brucellosis in Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis 2008, 14:1916–1918. 10.3201/eid1412.071452View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sadjjadi SM: Present situation of echinococcosis in the Middle East and Arabic North Africa. Parasitol Int 2006, 55:S197-S202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hotez PJ, Savioli L, Fenwick A: Neglected tropical diseases of the Middle East and North Africa: review of their prevalence, distribution, and opportunities for control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012, 6:e1475. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001475View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Aldeyab MA, Kearney MP, Scott MG, Aldiab MA, Alahmadi YM, Elhajji FWD, Magee FA, McElnay JC: An evaluation of the impact of antibiotic stewardship on reducing the use of high-risk antibiotics and its effect on the incidence of Clostridium difficile infection in hospital settings. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012, 67:2988–2996. 10.1093/jac/dks330View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamzeh AR, Al Najjar M, Mahfoud M: Prevalence of antibiotic resistance among Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Aleppo, Syria. Am J Infect Control 2012, 40:776–777. 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.09.019View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bakour S, Touati A, Sahli F, Ameur AA, Haouchine D, Rolain JM: Antibiotic resistance determinants of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates in Algeria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2013, 76:529–531. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.04.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Finley RL, Collignon P, Larsson DGJ, McEwen SA, Li XZ, Gaze WH, Reid-Smith R, Timinouni M, Graham DW, Topp E: The Scourge of Antibiotic Resistance: The Important Role of the Environment. Clin Infect Dis 2013, 57:704–710. 10.1093/cid/cit355View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Garbati MA, Bin Abdulhak A, Baba K, Sakkijha H: Infection due to colistin-resistant Enterobacteriacae in critically-ill patients. J Infect Dev Ctries 2013, 7:713–719.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Osman KM, Marouf SH, Alatfeehy N: Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence-Associated Genes of Salmonella enterica Subsp enterica Serotypes Muenster, Florian, Omuna, and Noya Strains Isolated from Clinically Diarrheic Humans in Egypt. Microb Drug Resist 2013, 19:370–377. 10.1089/mdr.2012.0151View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zumla A, Abubakar I, Raviglione M, Hoelscher M, Ditiu L, McHugh TD, Squire SB, Cox H, Ford N, McNerney R, et al.: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis-Current Dilemmas, Unanswered Questions, Challenges, and Priority Needs. J Infect Dis 2012, 205:S228-S240. 10.1093/infdis/jir858View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Menif K, Bouziri A, Khaldi A, Hamdi A, Belhadj S, Borgi A, Fitouri Z, Ben Jaballah N: Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. J Infect Dev Ctries 2011, 5:587–591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Buzaid N, Elzouki AN, Taher I, Ghenghesh KS: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a tertiary surgical and trauma hospital in Benghazi, Libya. J Infect Dev Ctries 2011, 5:723–726.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bissar-Tadmouri N, Tadmouri GO: Bibliometric analyses of biomedical research outputs in Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates (1988–2007). Saudi Med J 2009, 30:130–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF: Assessing urology and nephrology research activity in Arab countries using ISI web of science bibliometric database. BMC Res Notes 2014, 7:258. 10.1186/1756-0500-7-258View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomson R: Web of Knowledge. 2013.http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/SSR1103443WoK5-2_web3.pdf Google Scholar
  42. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Zyoud SH, Sawalha AF: Bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: research activity in Arab countries. Multidiscip Respir Med 2014, 9:38. 10.1186/2049-6958-9-38View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Zyoud SH, Sawalha AF, Ghanim MA: Osteoporosis is a neglected health priority in Arab World: a comparative bibliometric analysis. Springerplus 2014, 3:427. 10.1186/2193-1801-3-427View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sweileh WM, Zyoud SE, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF: Substance use disorders in Arab countries: research activity and bibliometric analysis. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2014, 9:33. 10.1186/1747-597X-9-33View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF: Quantity and quality of obesity-related research in Arab countries: assessment and comparative analysis. Health Res Policy Syst 2014, 12:33. 10.1186/1478-4505-12-33View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM: Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:667. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-667View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sweileh W, Al-Jabi S, Sawalha A: Zyoud Se: Bibliometric analysis of nutrition and dietetics research activity in Arab countries using ISI Web of Science database. SpringerPlus 2014, 3:718. 10.1186/2193-1801-3-718View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Compton A: Sensitization and immunization with bacteriophage in experimental plague. J Infect Dis 1928, 43:448–457. 10.1093/infdis/43.5.448View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Vinkler P: Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. J Inform Sci 2007, 33:481–491. 10.1177/0165551506072165View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Jacsó P: The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Web of Science. Online Inform Rev 2008, 32:673–688. 10.1108/14684520810914043View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Jacsó P: The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Scopus. Online Inform Rev 2008, 32:524–535. 10.1108/14684520810897403View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Jacsó P: The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar. Online Inform Rev 2008, 32:437–452. 10.1108/14684520810889718View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Lehmann S, Jackson AD, Lautrup BE: Measures for measures. Nature 2006, 444:1003–1004. 10.1038/4441003aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Hirsch JE: Does the h index have predictive power? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:19193–19198. 10.1073/pnas.0707962104View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Leventhal A, Ramlawi A, Belbiesi A, Balicer RD: Regional collaboration in the Middle East to deal with H5N1 avian flu. BMJ 2006, 333:856–858. 10.1136/bmj.38994.420926.80View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Saad MD, Lu’ay SA, Gamal-Eldein MA, Fouda MK, Khalil FM, Yingst SL, Parker MA, Montevillel MR: Possible avian influenza (H5N1) from migratory bird, Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis 2007, 13:1120–1121. 10.3201/eid1307.061222View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Meleigy M: Egypt battles with avian influenza. Lancet 2007, 370:553–554. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61274-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Aly M, Arafa A, Hassan M: Epidemiological findings of outbreaks of disease caused by highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus in poultry in Egypt during 2006. Avian Dis 2008, 52:269–277. 10.1637/8166-103007-Reg.1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lu L, Liu Q, Du L, Jiang S: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): challenges in identifying its source and controlling its spread. Microbes Infect 2013, 15:625–629. 10.1016/j.micinf.2013.06.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. de Groot RJ, Baker SC, Baric RS, Brown CS, Drosten C, Enjuanes L, Fouchier RA, Galiano M, Gorbalenya AE, Memish ZA: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): announcement of the Coronavirus Study Group. J Virol 2013, 87:7790–7792. 10.1128/JVI.01244-13View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Ithete NL, Stoffberg S, Corman VM, Cottontail VM, Richards LR, Schoeman MC, Drosten C, Drexler JF, Preiser W: Close relative of human Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in bat, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 2013, 19:1697–1699. 10.3201/eid1910.130946View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Bermingham A, Chand M, Brown C, Aarons E, Tong C, Langrish C, Hoschler K, Brown K, Galiano M, Myers R: Severe respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus, in a patient transferred to the United Kingdom from the Middle East, September 2012. Euro Surveill 2012, 17:20290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Bakonyi T, Ivanics T, Erdelyi K, Ursu K, Ferenczi E, Weissenbock H, Nowotny N: Lineage 1 and 2 strains of encephalitic West Nile virus, central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 2006, 12:618–623. 10.3201/eid1204.051379View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Andreadis TG, Anderson JF, Vossbrinck CR, Main AJ: Epidemiology of West Nile virus in Connecticut: A five-year analysis of mosquito data 1999–2003. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2004, 4:360–378. 10.1089/vbz.2004.4.360View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Shah NS, Wright A, Bai GH, Barrera L, Boulahbal F, Martin-Casabona N, Drobniewski F, Gilpin C, Havelkova M, Lepe R, et al.: Worldwide emergence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis 2007, 13:380–387. 10.3201/eid1303.061400View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Bucheton B, Kheir MM, El-Safi SH, Hammad A, Mergani A, Mary C, Abel L, Dessein A: The interplay between environmental and host factors during an outbreak of visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Sudan. Microbes Infect 2002, 4:1449–1457. 10.1016/S1286-4579(02)00027-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Dereure J, El-Safi SH, Bucheton B, Boni M, Kheir MM, Davoust B, Pratlong F, Feugier E, Lambert M, Dessein A, Dedet JP: Visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Sudan: parasite identification in humans and dogs; host-parasite relationships. Microbes Infect 2003, 5:1103–1108. 10.1016/j.micinf.2003.07.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Reithinger R, Dujardin JC, Louzir H, Pirmez C, Alexander B, Brooker S: Cutaneous leishmaniasis. Lancet Infect Dis 2007, 7:581–596. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70209-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Bordons M, Gomez I, Fernandez MT, Zulueta MA, Mendez A: Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics 1996, 37:279–295. 10.1007/BF02093625View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Bozeman B, Corley E: Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Res Policy 2004, 33:599–616. 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Wagner CS: Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics 2005, 62:3–26. 10.1007/s11192-005-0001-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Basu A, Kumar BSV: International collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scientometrics 2000, 48:381–402. 10.1023/A:1005692505687View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Nauen CE: Ten years of international scientific cooperation in fisheries, aquaculture and coastal zones: some preliminary lessons. Environ Dev Sustain 2008, 10:605–622. 10.1007/s10668-008-9153-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Hermez J, Petrak J, Karkouri M, Riedner G: A review of HIV testing and counseling policies and practices in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. AIDS 2010, 24:S25-S32. 10.1097/01.aids.0000386730.56683.e5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Alkaiyat A, Weiss MG: HIV in the Middle East and North Africa: priority, culture, and control. Int J Public Health 2013, 58:927–937. 10.1007/s00038-013-0485-yView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Moulin AM: The social and political issues of vaccinations. Med Mal Infect 2003, 33:564–569. 10.1016/S0399-077X(03)00208-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Jumaa PA: Hand hygiene: simple and complex. Int J Infect Dis 2005, 9:3–14. 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.05.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sweileh et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement