Open Access

HIV care-seeking behaviour after HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men in Beijing, China: a cross-sectional study

Infectious Diseases of Poverty20176:112

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-017-0326-y

Received: 17 May 2017

Accepted: 12 June 2017

Published: 28 June 2017

Abstract

Background

Men who have sex with men (MSM) has become the group with the fastest growing HIV epidemic in China. Since many Chinese MSM are conducting HIV self-testing, we aimed to determine the rate of HIV care seeking after self-testing, examine characteristics of “seekers” compared to “non-seekers,” and explore factors associated with HIV care-seeking behaviour.

Methods

A cross-sectional study design was used and an online survey was conducted in Beijing, China in 2016, among users of a popular Chinese gay networking smart phone application. Chi-square test was used to compare characteristics of those who sought HIV care (“seekers”) and those who did not (“non-seekers”). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess factors associated with HIV care seeking.

Results

Among 21,785 screened, 2383 participants (10.9%) were included in the study. A total of 380 participants (15.9%) reported seeking HIV care after HIV self-testing while 2003 (84.1%) did not. Lack of knowledge of the “window period” (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.47–0.97, P = 0.04) was associated with reduced odds of seeking HIV care, while lower monthly income (AOR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.03–1.62, P = 0.03) and obtaining HIV self-testing kits from health facilities (AOR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.81–3.17, P < 0.001), and non-governmental organizations (AOR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.79–3.34, P < 0.001) was associated with increased odds of seeking HIV care. Among those who sought HIV care, a large majority (92.4%) had non-reactive HIV self-testing results. Only 29 out of 265 with reactive, uncertain, or unknown results sought HIV care.

Conclusions

We found a very low rate of HIV care seeking among our sample of urban Chinese MSM. The observation that most with reactive, uncertain, or unknown results did not seek HIV care is a cause for concern. These people should be paid more attention and helped to enter the care cascade. Our findings highlight that interventions aimed at improving linkage to care after HIV self-testing are urgently needed. However, further study is required to inform the design and implementation of future interventions aiming to encourage HIV care-seeking behaviour.

Keywords

Men who have sex with men HIV self-testing HIV care Linkage to care Care cascade China

Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file 1 for translations of the abstract into the five official working languages of the United Nations

Background

Testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is an important strategy for prevention and control the global epidemic as evidenced by its inclusion as the first goal of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 90-90-90 targets—90% of people living with HIV (PLHIV) diagnosed by the year 2020 [1]. However, approximately 43% of PLHIV worldwide were still unaware of their infection status in 2015 [2]. In China, there were estimated 850,000 PLHIV in 2015, but approximately 35% of them remained unidentified [3]. Sexual contact has become the most common mode of transmission and men who have sex with men (MSM) has become the high-risk group with the most rapidly rising HIV prevalence, climbing from approximately 1.5% in 2005, to 8.0% in 2015 [4, 5].

HIV voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) services have been free since 2002, and accessible nationwide since 2004, and provider-initiated testing and counselling (PITC), although not free, has been available since 2007 [6]. Moreover, a variety of intensive education efforts focused on promoting testing uptake have been ongoing since 2003 [6], and MSM-friendly community-based organizations have had gradually increasing involvement in testing mobilization campaigns [5, 79]. Nevertheless, testing rates remain persistently low among Chinese MSM. A meta-analysis in 2012 found a rate of lifetime HIV testing of 47% and testing in the past 12 months of only 38% [10].

Officially, HIV testing in China must be performed by trained medical personnel only and is purely facility-based, being offered primarily at VCT sites, hospitals and specialized HIV/AIDS clinics, and at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) offices. [11] However, a recent study found willingness to test at CDCs among only 28% of Chinese MSM participants [12]. Barriers to traditional, facility based testing among Chinese MSM primarily include inconvenience (facilities are too far away or days/hours of operation conflict with work), worry about privacy and confidentiality, fear of social stigma and resulting discrimination, and unwillingness to register for testing under one’s real name [5, 1214].

HIV self-testing may help to reach populations that do not access conventional facility-based testing services [2, 5, 1518], having advantages including convenience and flexibility, and privacy and confidentiality. Despite official policy, a wide range of HIV self-test kit products have become readily available in China both online and at medical facilities. The present study aimed to determine the rate of HIV care seeking after self-testing, examine characteristics of those who sought HIV care after self-testing, and explore factors associated with HIV care seeking.

Methods

Study design and setting

A cross-sectional study design was used, see Fig. 1, and an online survey among MSM in Beijing was conducted from May 14 to May 17, 2016. The results of a portion of this survey have been published elsewhere [19], and thus some details of survey-specific methods are not repeated here.
Fig. 1

Study design and population

For the purposes of this study, “HIV self-testing” was defined as using an HIV test on oneself without the supervision, consultation, or counselling of trained healthcare staff. “HIV care seeking” was defined approaching health workers at CDC, clinic/hospital, or non-governmental organization (NGO) venues, after performing HIV self-testing, to obtain further HIV counselling, testing, or other care services.

Eligibility criteria

Participants were eligible for the study if they met the following criteria: (1) being users of a popular gay networking smart phone application (App) who registered in the App with Beijing location and had smart phone global positioning satellite (GPS) signals localized within Beijing, (2) being male and having ever had anal sex with men, (3) being ≥18 years of age, (4) believing one’s HIV serostatus to be negative, or not knowing one’s HIV serostatus, (5) having ever taken an HIV self-test (i.e., had ever used of an HIV self-test kit on oneself without professional consultation), and (6) having provided informed consent.

Data collection and quality assurance

The questionnaire was adapted from that of a recent study by Wong and colleagues [20]. It was modified for the present study and then piloted among 110 MSM selected by convenience sampling methods from QQ, a popular Chinese instant messaging software service. For the face-to-face pilot, a total of 56 MSM were asked to complete the questionnaire on paper and then give feedback on how to improve it. For the online pilot, a total of 110 MSM were asked to complete an online version of the questionnaire. After analysing the results, several small technical errors within the questionnaire were identified. The questionnaire was further modified based on feedback received and errors identified during the pilot. Participants included in the pilots were excluded from the study.

Each participant was given a unique identifier based on his internet protocol (IP) address and was only allowed to take the survey once. Participants were provided with definitions of the terms “HIV self-testing” and “HIV care-seeking.” The final questionnaire collected information on demographics, sexual behaviour, drug use, HIV self-testing experience, and sexual health history. The questionnaire was adaptive, only participants who answered affirmatively to certain questions were presented additional questions on that topic.

Questions were displayed one at a time and participants were to select from a list of answer choices provided. For nearly all questions, participants were only allowed to select one answer. There were two questions for which participants could choose multiple answers. Those questions were: “How do you find information on HIV self-testing?” and “What factors are most important when choosing an HIV self-test kit?”

Statistical analysis

Characteristics of all participants were described by categorical variables presented as number and percent. Participants were separated into two subgroups according to whether they sought HIV care after self-testing (“seekers”), or not (“non-seekers”). Differences between subgroups were assessed by Chi-square analysis and P-values are presented.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression modelling was used to explore factors associated with seeking HIV care after HIV self-testing. HIV care seeking was given a value of 1 and no HIV care seeking was given a value of 0. Independent variables were selected based on results of univariate analysis, all variables with outcomes of P < 0.05 were entered into the multivariate model. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All confidence intervals presented were 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). All analyses were performed using Version 18.0 SPSS software Version 18.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Science, IBM, New York, USA).

Ethics

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Informed consent was collected electronically for all study participants. The survey was anonymous and no compensation for participation was provided.

Results

The study population

A total 21,785 users who clicked on the online survey link were screened for study inclusion. Among them, 12,910 were outside Beijing, 885 had never had anal sex with a male partner, 27 were <18 years old, 5111 had never taken an HIV self-test in their lifetime, 357 had a known HIV-positive serostatus, and 112 did not provide informed consent. Therefore, the final study population was 2383 MSM (of 21,785, 10.9%), see Fig. 1.

Characteristics of participants

Among study participants, 62.6% were <30 years of age, 79.1% had college-level education or greater, 71.6% had lived in Beijing for at least 2 years, 86.9% were unmarried, and 74.5% self-identified as homosexual, see Table 1. A majority reported having had fewer than 2 male sex partners (58.6%) and consistently using condoms (62.0%) during anal sex with male partners in past 3 months. Furthermore, 45.4% reported having ever used drugs in their lifetimes.
Table 1

Characteristics of all participants by HIV care-seeking statusa

Variable

All Participants

[N = 2383]

n (%)

“Seekers” Subgroup

[n = 380]

n (%)

“Non-Seekers” Subgroup

[n = 2003]

n (%)

P-value

Demographic Characteristics

 Age (years)

   

0.48

  18–24

649 (27.2)

106 (27.9)

543 (27.1)

 

  25–29

841 (35.3)

124 (32.6)

717 (35.8)

 

  ≥ 30

893 (37.5)

150 (39.5)

743 (37.1)

 

 Education level

   

0.03

  ≤ High Schoolb

499 (20.9)

95 (25.0)

404 (20.2)

 

  ≥ College and above

1884 (79.1)

285 (75.0)

1599 (79.8)

 

 Monthly income (CNY)

   

0.03

  ≤ 5000

997 (41.8)

178 (46.8)

819 (40.9)

 

  > 5000

1386 (58.2)

202 (53.2)

1184 (59.1)

 

 Duration of residence in Beijing (years)

   

0.98

  < 2

676 (28.4)

108 (28.4)

568 (28.4)

 

  ≥ 2

1707 (71.6)

272 (71.6)

1435 (71.6)

 

 Marital status

   

0.63

  Married

313 (13.1)

47 (12.4)

266 (13.3)

 

  Unmarried

2070 (86.9)

333 (87.6)

1737 (86.7)

 

 Sexual orientation

   

0.37

  Homosexual

1775 (74.5)

293 (77.1)

1482 (74.0)

 

  Bisexual

604 (25.3)

86 (22.6)

518 (25.9)

 

  Unknown/Unsure

4 (0.2)

1 (0.3)

3 (0.1)

 

Sexual Behaviour Characteristics

 Number of male anal sex partners in past 3 months

  

0.07

  < 2

1397 (58.6)

239 (62.9)

1158 (57.8)

 

  ≥ 2

986 (41.4)

141 (37.1)

845 (42.2)

 

 Condom use with male anal sex partners in past 3 months

  

0.86

  Always

1105 (62.0)

171 (61.5)

934 (62.1)

 

  Inconsistent

678 (38.0)

107 (38.5)

571 (37.9)

 

  Missing

600

   

Drug Use Behaviour Characteristics

 Drug use ever in lifetime

   

0.95

  Yes

1082 (45.4)

172 (45.3)

910 (45.4)

 

  No

1301 (54.6)

208 (54.7)

1093 (54.6)

 

 Anal sex after drug use

   

0.70

  Yes

927 (38.9)

149 (86.6)

778 (85.5)

 

  No

155 (6.5)

23 (13.4)

132 (14.5)

 

  No drug use

1301 (54.6)

   

 Condom use during anal sex after drug use

   

0.92

  Always

613 (25.7)

98 (65.8)

515 (66.2)

 

  Inconsistent

314 (13.2)

51 (34.2)

263 (33.8)

 

  No anal sex after drug use

155 (6.5)

   

  No drug use

1301 (54.6)

   

Use of HIV Self-Test Kits

 Source of HIV self-test kits

   

< 0.001

  Internet

1448 (60.8)

182 (47.9)

1266 (63.2)

 

  Health facilities

422 (17.7)

102 (26.8)

320 (16.0)

 

  NGOs

285 (12.0)

73 (19.2)

212 (10.6)

 

  Friends/Other

228 (9.6)

23 (6.1)

205 (10.2)

 

 Reason for most recent testing

   

0.14

  Routine

1154 (48.4)

202 (53.2)

952 (47.5)

 

  Had unprotected anal sex

469 (19.7)

76 (20.0)

393 (19.6)

 

  Had physical discomfort

165 (6.9)

26 (6.8)

139 (6.9)

 

  Going to have a new/lifetime partner

369 (15.5)

45 (11.8)

324 (16.2)

 

  To confirm a previous result

129 (5.4)

21 (5.5)

108 (5.4)

 

  Other

97 (4.1)

10 (2.6)

87 (4.3)

 

 Considered the “window period” in deciding when to testc

  

0.02

  Yes

1584 (66.5)

269 (70.8)

1315 (65.7)

 

  No

426 (17.9)

70 (18.4)

356 (17.8)

 

  Don’t know

373 (15.7)

41 (10.8)

332 (16.6)

 

 Most recent HIV self-test result

   

< 0.001

  Non-reactive

2118 (88.9)

351 (92.4)

1767 (88.2)

 

  Reactive

30 (1.3)

5 (1.3)

25 (1.2)

 

  Uncertain

92 (3.9)

24 (6.3)

68 (3.4)

 

  Unknown

143 (6.0)

0 (0.0)

143 (7.1)

 

 Sought healthcare for STI symptoms in past 1 year

  

0.27

  Yes

245 (10.3)

45 (11.8)

200 (10.0)

 

  No

2138 (89.7)

335 (88.2)

1803 (90.0)

 

HIV human immunodeficiency virus, CNY Chinese Yuan, CDC Centers for Disease Control, NGO non-government organization, STI sexually-transmitted infection

aHIV care seeking was defined as an individual approaching health workers at clinic, hospital, NGO, or CDC venues for the purpose of obtaining further HIV counselling, testing, or other care services, after administering an HIV self-test

bThe category “High School” includes also vocational or technical school

cFor the most recent self-test taken

Compared to “non-seekers,” a smaller proportion of “seekers” had college or higher levels of education (75.0% versus 79.8%, P = 0.03) and monthly incomes of >5000 Chinese Yuan (CNY, > approximately 733 US Dollars, 53.2% versus 59.1%, P = 0.03). A larger proportion of “seekers” considered the “window period” in deciding when to take their most recent HIV self-test (70.8% versus 65.7%, P = 0.02). In terms of participants’ most recent HIV self-test result, a greater proportion of “seekers” had a negative result (92.4% versus 88.2%, P < 0.001), see Table 1

Factors associated with HIV care-seeking behaviour

Income of 5000 CNY or less per month was associated with increased odds of HIV care-seeking behaviour (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.03–1.62, P = 0.03), obtaining HIV self-testing kits from health facilities (AOR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.81–3.17, P < 0.001), and NGOs (AOR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.79–3.34, P < 0.001), was associated with increased odds of HIV care-seeking behaviour. Finally, answering “Don’t Know” to the question “Did you consider the window period in deciding when to take your most recent HIV self-test?” was associated with decreased odds of HIV care-seeking behaviour (AOR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.47–0.98, P = 0.04). Those who were not sure their HIV self-test result were more likely to have HIV care-seeking behaviour (AOR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.97–2.63, P = 0.07), see Table 2.
Table 2

Factors associated with HIV care-seeking behaviour after HIV self-testing

Variablea

OR (95% CI)

P-value

AOR (95% CI)

P-value

Demographic Characteristics

 Age (years)

  18–24

1.00

   

  25–29

0.89 (0.67–1.18)

0.40

  

  ≥ 30

1.03 (0.79–1.36)

0.81

  

 Education level

  ≥ College and above

1.00

 

-

 

  ≤ High School b

1.32 (1.02–1.71)

0.03

-

-

 Monthly income (CNY)

  > 5000

1.00

 

1.00

 

  ≤ 5000

1.27 (1.02–1.59)

0.03

1.29 (1.03–1.62)

0.03

 Duration of residence in Beijing (years)

  < 2

1.00

   

  ≥ 2

0.99 (0.78–1.27)

0.98

  

 Marital status

  Married

1.00

   

  Unmarried

1.09 (0.78–1.51)

0.63

  

 Sexual orientation

  Homosexual

1.00

   

  Bisexual

0.84 (0.65–1.09)

0.19

  

  Unknown/Unsure

1.69 (0.18–16.27)

0.65

  

Sexual Behaviour Characteristics

 Number of male anal sex partners in past 3 months

  < 2

1.00

   

  ≥ 2

0.81 (0.65–1.01)

0.07

  

 Condom use with male anal sex partners in past 3 months

  Always

1.00

   

  Inconsistent

1.02 (0.79–1.33)

0.86

  

Drug Use Behaviour Characteristics

 Drug use ever in lifetime

  No

1.00

   

  Yes

0.99 (0.80–1.24)

0.95

  

 Anal sex after drug Use

  No

1.00

   

  Yes

1.10 (0.68–1.77)

0.70

  

 Condom use during anal sex after drug use

  Always

1.00

   

  Inconsistent

1.02 (0.70–1.48)

0.92

  

Use of HIV Self-Test Kits

 Source of HIV self-test kits

  Internet

1.00

 

1.00

 

  Health facilities

2.22 (1.69–2.91)

< 0.001

2.40 (1.81–3.17)

< 0.001

  NGOs

2.40 (1.76–3.26)

< 0.001

2.44 (1.79–3.34)

< 0.001

  Friends/Other

0.78 (0.49–1.23)

0.29

0.87 (0.55–1.38)

0.56

 Reason for most recent testing

  Routine

1.00

   

  Had unprotected anal sex

0.91 (0.68–1.22)

0.53

  

  Had physical discomfort

0.88 (0.57–1.38)

0.58

  

  Going to have a new/lifetime partner

0.66 (0.46–0.93)

0.02

  

  To confirm a previous result

0.92 (0.56–1.50)

0.73

  

  Other

0.54 (0.27–1.06)

0.54

  

 Did you consider the “window period” in deciding when to take your most recent HIV self-test?

  Yes

1.00

 

1.00

 

  No

0.96 (0.72–1.28)

0.79

0.89 (0.66–1.19)

0.43

  Don’t know

0.60 (0.43–0.86)

0.005

0.68 (0.47–0.97)

0.04

 Most recent HIV self-test result

  Non-reactive

1.00

 

1.00

 

  Active

1.01 (0.38–2.65)

0.99

0.95 (0.35–2.56)

0.92

  Uncertain

1.78 (1.10–2.87)

0.02

1.60 (0.97–2.63)

0.07

  Unknown

    

 Sought healthcare for STI symptoms in past 1 year

  No

1.00

   

  Yes

1.21 (0.86–1.71)

0.28

  

HIV human immunodeficiency virus, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, AOR adjusted odds ratio, CNY Chinese Yuan, CDC Centers for Disease Control, NGO non-government organization, STI sexually-transmitted infection

a Only variables having results found to be statistically significant in univariate and multivariate analyses are included.

b The category “High School” includes also vocational or technical school.

Among the 30 participants who reported reactive HIV self-test results, only 5 (16.7%) sought HIV care, and no differences were found in sexual or drug using behaviours between “seekers” and “non-seekers,” see Table 3.
Table 3

Sexual behaviour characteristics of participants who had reactive results on their most recent HIV self-test

Variable

All Participants

[N = 30] n (%)

“Seekers” Subgroup

[n = 5] n (%)

“Non-Seekers” Subgroup

[n = 25] n (%)

P-value

Sexual Behaviour Characteristics

 Number of male anal sex partners in past 3 months

   

0.57

  < 2

14 (46.7)

2 (40.0)

12 (48.0)

 

  ≥ 2

16 (53.3)

3 (60.0)

13 (52.0)

 

 Condom use with male anal sex partners in past 3 months

   

0.36

  Always

13 (54.2)

3 (75.0)

10 (50.0)

 

  Inconsistent

11 (45.8)

1 (25.0)

10 (50.0)

 

  Missing

6

   

Drug Use Behaviour Characteristics

 Drug use ever in lifetime

   

0.68

  Yes

18 (60.0)

3 (60.0)

15 (60.0)

 

  No

12 (40.0)

2 (40.0)

10 (40.0)

 

 Anal sex after drug use

   

0.69

  Yes

16 (88.9)

3 (100.0)

13 (86.7)

 

  No

2 (11.1)

0 (0.0)

2 (13.3)

 

  No Drug Use

12

   

 Condom use during anal sex after drug use

   

0.21

  Always

10 (62.5)

3 (100.0)

7 (53.8)

 

  Inconsistent

6 (37.5)

0 (0.0)

6 (46.2)

 

  No anal sex after drug use

2

   

  No drug use

12

   

 Sought healthcare for STI symptoms in past 1 year

   

0.30

  Yes

6 (20.0)

0 (0.0)

6 (24.0)

 

  No

24 (80.0)

5 (100.0)

19 (76.0)

 

HIV human immunodeficiency virus, STI sexually-transmitted infection

Discussion

As expected, we found a very low rate of HIV care seeking after HIV self-testing—only 15.9% among our MSM sample. These “seekers” tended to have lower educational attainment and lower monthly incomes, but were more conscious of the window period in deciding when to self-test and tended to source their kits health facilities (e.g., CDC offices, hospitals, NGOs). Factors with statistically significant associations with seeking HIV care after self-testing included having lower incomes and sourcing kits at health facilities.

Although a recent systemic review and meta-analysis found that data on linkage to care after HIV self-testing was lacking, a few studies other low- and middle-income countries support our finding of low rates of care seeking after HIV self-testing and offer some ideas on how linkage may be improved [21]. Two studies with linkage to care outcomes among male partners of pregnant women in Kenya have found that although 72% reportedly sought confirmatory testing after HIV self-testing, only 2 of the 8 men who had a reactive self-test result were linked to care [22, 23] . A small study in Peru in which 147 MSM and 45 transgender women were interviewed found that although 82% were willing to use HIV self-test kits, only 55% reported that they would seek confirmatory testing after a reactive result [24] . A qualitative study in South Africa identified many perceived barriers to linkage to HIV care after self-testing, which has informed a pilot intervention there aimed at improving post-self-test linkage via trained counsellors reaching out to testers via mobile phone technologies to encourage and measure HIV care seeking [25]. A trial of in-home versus facility-based linkage to care and ART initiation after HIV self-testing in Malawi found a significant improvement in ART initiation rates with the in-home linkage model [26]. Finally, a study of linkage to care among HIV self-testing Chinese MSM found that social entrepreneurship testing model resulted in all 8 individuals in the study confirmed to have HIV infection being successfully linked to care [27].

Notably, we found that a large majority of those who sought HIV care did so after a non-reactive (negative) self-test result (92.4%). Moreover, a majority of participants who self-reported that their most recent HIV self-test result was either reactive (positive), uncertain, or unknown did not seek HIV care afterward. Unfortunately, participants were not asked their reasons for seeking (or not seeking) HIV care after self-testing, and the cross-sectional study design does not allow examinations of causality. Thus, we were unable to explore the motives of seekers and non-seekers. Nevertheless, we can suggest some possible explanations that warrant future study.

Firstly, we found that participants who obtained their kits from health facilities were more than two times more likely to later seek HIV care after using their self-test kit. It is possible that participants received face-to-face counselling about self-testing and subsequent linkage to care while at these facilities. Point-of-sale pre-test counselling was, in fact, included as a recommended minimum standard of service delivery for HIV self-testing programs by the WHO in 2013. Expanding and strengthening point-of-sale pre-test counselling may be one way to improve linkage to HIV care for those who choose to self-test.

Secondly, we also found that participants who responded “don’t know” when asked if they considered the window period in deciding when to test were half as likely to later seek HIV care after using their self-test kit. It is possible that those with perhaps relatively higher HIV/AIDS knowledge may seek HIV care after a non-reactive self-test result because of a lack of trust in the quality of the product and/or the reliability of the result. Globally, quality concerns about self-test kits sold over-the-counter have been expressed not only by self-test takers, but also by public health experts and policymakers [18]. In China, and specifically among MSM, several studies have found accuracy of HIV self-test kits to be a major concern [16, 17, 20, 2830]. This lack of trust may be severely limiting the HIV self-testing uptake, and perhaps subsequent linkage to HIV care.

The findings of a nearly 40% rate of HIV self-testing uptake and over 90% willingness to use HIV self-test kits in the future in this same population are encouraging [19]. However, further study on HIV care-seeking behaviour and features of HIV care services that could improve its uptake by this population is required. Outcomes of these studies could possibly inform the design of future education and self-testing promotion campaigns, community-based self-testing mobilization efforts, point-of-sale pre-test counselling, and other interventions may help to drive self-testing uptake and subsequent linkage to HIV care for those who obtain reactive, uncertain, or unknown results from self-test kit use. However, all of these must first be preceded by regulation and policy. The China Food and Drug Administration must, itself, review the evidence for safety and reliability of HIV self-test products, conduct its own risk-benefit analysis based on the China context, examine test systems as a whole, including instructions for use in the hands of inexperienced users, and partner with manufacturers to ensure products meet acceptable standards, receive approval, and are regularly audited against quality standards. Furthermore, China’s public health policymakers must create a framework for inclusion of HIV self-testing in existing programming, drive education, and encourage community-based test mobilization, not just for MSM, but for all high-risk populations [2, 18, 29]. This important new tool in the fight against HIV/AIDS must be brought to bear such that it can reach its potential and bring China closer to the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals.

Limitations

This study had several limitations. Firstly, participants were all users of a popular gay networking App, and therefore MSM who were not users of the App could not be recruited. Since it is possible that some subgroups were not represented (e.g., those who do not have smart phones, or use gay networking Apps), the results of this study may not be generalizable to the entire Chinese MSM population. Secondly, because of severe dual-stigma facing MSM in China who have HIV infection, self-reported responses to questions related to HIV self-test results, in particular, may be subject to social desirability bias. Thirdly, questions as to the reasons for seeking or not seeking healthcare after HIV self-testing were not asked of participants as a part of the survey’s questionnaire and because of the retrospective, cross-sectional study design, it is not possible to determine causality.

Conclusions

Our finding of a low rate of HIV care seeking after HIV self-testing (15.9%), and the even lower rate among those who obtained reactive, uncertain, or unknown results (10.9%) is very concerning. HIV self-testing could be an important key to growing the presently sub-optimal testing uptake of MSM in China [5, 16, 17, 2932], and helping China reach the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets [1]. However, dramatic improvements in linkage to further HIV testing and care for HIV self-testers is of critical importance. Although further study is required to inform the design and implementation of interventions aimed to close this gap, China must take urgent action to help those who screen reactive on HIV self-tests to get the care they need.

Abbreviations

95% CI

95% confidence interval

AOR

Adjusted odds ratio

App: 

Smart phone application

CDC: 

Center for Disease Control and Prevention

CNY: 

Chinese Yuan

GPS: 

Global positioning satellite

HIV: 

Human immunodeficiency virus

IP: 

Internet protocol

IRB: 

Institutional Review Board

MSM: 

Men who have sex with men

NGO: 

Non-governmental organization

OR

Odds ratio

PITC: 

Provider-initiated testing and counselling

PLHIV: 

People living with HIV

QQ: 

An instant messenger developed by the Tencent company

SPSS: 

Statistical package for the social sciences

STI: 

Sexually-transmitted infection

UNAIDS: 

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS

USD: 

United States Dollar

VCT: 

Voluntary counselling and testing

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the non-governmental organization of Beijing “Dan Lan” for implementing the survey. The authors also thank all participating MSM for supporting the research project.

Funding

The study was supported by the National Health and Family Planning Commission, the People’s Republic of China, with grant numbers 131-14-000-105-01 and 2012ZX10001-007. The funding agency has no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Study data are available from the NCAIDS IRB Committee to researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Please contact Ms. Meng-Chi Liu, Office of NCAIDS IRB at mengchi@chinaaids.cn.

Authors’ contributions

XR designed the study, collected the data, conducted data analysis, contributed to results interpretation, and wrote the first draft of manuscript. ZW designed the study, supervised data collection and data analysis, contributed to results interpretation, and revised the manuscript. GM contributed to study design, assisted in data collection, data analysis, and interpretation of results. JMM contributed to interpretation of results, and drafting and revision of manuscript. KR coordinated study implementation and participated in data interpretation. YZ contributed to study design, and assisted in data analysis and interpretation of results. NZ assisted in writing the first draft of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the IRB of National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, China CDC, with approval reference number X160310412.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed herein belong to the authors alone, and do not represent the official policy, or endorsement of their affiliated institutions.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Prevention Intervention, National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(2)
Office of the Director, National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(3)
Division of Treatment and Care, National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

References

  1. UNAIDS. 90–90-90 an ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2014. Available from: http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/90-90-90_en_0.pdf. Cited 15 Nov 2016Google Scholar
  2. UNITAID. Technology landscape HIV rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing. Geneva: UNITAID; 2016. 2nd. Available from: http://unitaid.eu/assets/UNITAID_HIV_rapid_diagnostic_tests_for_self-testing.pdf. Updated 1 July 2016; Cited 17 Nov 2016.
  3. Li Y. WHO claimed 30% HIV infected remain undiagnosed and encouraged more HIV testing in China. Beijing: CaixinOnline; 2015. Available from: http://china.caixin.com/2015-12-01/100880481.html. Cited 18 Nov 2016Google Scholar
  4. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China. 2015 China AIDS response progress report. Beijing: UNAIDS; 2015. Available from: http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/country/documents/CHN_narrative_report_2015.pdf. Cited 15 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  5. Tang S, Tang W, Meyers K, Chan P, Chen Z, Tucker JD. HIV epidemiology and responses among men who have sex with men and transgender individuals in China: a scoping review. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):588. Epub 2016/10/22. doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1904-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Wu Z, Sullivan SG, Wang Y, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Detels R. Evolution of China's response to HIV/AIDS. Lancet (London, England). 2007;369(9562):679–690. Epub 2007/02/27. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60315-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yan H, Zhang M, Zhao J, Huan X, Ding J, Wu S, et al. The increased effectiveness of HIV preventive intervention among men who have sex with men and of follow-up care for people living with HIV after ‘task-shifting’ to community-based organizations: a ‘cash on service delivery’ model in China. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103146. Epub 2014/07/23. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103146.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang DP, Han L, Li CM, Meng SN, Leng ZW, Li F, et al. The impact of community-based organizations in HIV testing mobilization among men who have sex with men. Chin J Prev Med. 2013;47(5):431–4. Epub 2013/08/21Google Scholar
  9. Duan Y, Zhang H, Wang J, Wei S, Yu F, She M. Community-based peer intervention to reduce HIV risk among men who have sex with men in Sichuan province, China. AIDS Educ Prev. 2013;25(1):38–48. Epub 2013/02/08. doi:10.1521/aeap.2013.25.1.38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zou H, Hu N, Xin Q, Beck J. HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(7):1717–1728. Epub 2012/06/09. doi:10.1007/s10461-012-0225-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wu Z. Practical manual for HIV testing and counseling. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Tao J, Li MY, Qian HZ, Wang LJ, Zhang Z, Ding HF, et al. Home-based HIV testing for men who have sex with men in China: a novel community-based partnership to complement government programs. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102812. Epub 2014/07/23. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102812.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu Y, Sun X, Qian HZ, Yin L, Yan Z, Wang L, et al. Qualitative assessment of barriers and facilitators of access to HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2015;29(9):481–489. Epub 2015/07/18. doi:10.1089/apc.2015.0083.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Wei C, Yan H, Yang C, Raymond HF, Li J, Yang H, et al. Accessing HIV testing and treatment among men who have sex with men in China: a qualitative study. AIDS Care. 2014;26(3):372–378. Epub 2013/08/06. doi:10.1080/09540121.2013.824538.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Estem KS, Catania J, Klausner JD. HIV self-testing: a review of current implementation and fidelity. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2016;13(2):107–115. Epub 2016/02/18. doi:10.1007/s11904-016-0307-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Xun H, Kang D, Huang T, Qian Y, Li X, Wilson EC, et al. Factors associated with willingness to accept oral fluid HIV rapid testing among most-at-risk populations in China. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80594. Epub 2013/11/22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080594.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Xu Y, Zhang Z, Li D, Liu Y, Pan SW, Qi X, et al. Willingness to use the oral fluid HIV rapid test among men who have sex with men in Beijing, China. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64652. Epub 2013/05/30. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064652.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. WHO, UNAIDS, Brocher Foundation, LSTM. Report on the first international symposium on self-testing for HIV: the legal, ethical, gender, human rights and public health implications of self-testing scale-up. Meeting report - Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva: WHO; 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/vct/self_test/en/. Cited 15 Nov 2016Google Scholar
  19. Ren X, Wu Z, Mi G, McGoogan J, Rou K, Zhao Y. Uptake of HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men in Beijing, China: a cross-sectional study. Biomed Environ Sci. 2017. In press.Google Scholar
  20. Wong HT, Tam HY, Chan DP, Lee SS. Usage and acceptability of HIV self-testing in men who have sex with men in Hong Kong. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(3):505–515. Epub 2014/08/26. doi:10.1007/s10461-014-0881-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson CC, Kennedy C, Fonner V, Siegfried N, Figueroa C, Dalal S, et al. Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(1):1–10. Epub 2017/05/23. doi:10.7448/IAS.20.1.21594.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gichangi A. Provision of oral HIV self-test kits triples uptake of HIV testing among male partners of antenatal care clients: results of a randomized trial in Kenya. Durban: Presented at 21st International AIDS Conference, July 18–22, 2016; 2016.Google Scholar
  23. Masters SH, Agot K, Obonyo B, Napierala Mavedzenge S, Maman S, Thirumurthy H. Promoting partner testing and couples testing through secondary distribution of HIV self-tests: a randomized clinical trial. PLoS Med. 2016;13(11):e1002166. Epub 2016/11/09. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002166.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bustamante MJ, Konda KA, Joseph Davey D, Leon SR, Calvo GM, Salvatierra J, et al. HIV self-testing in Peru: questionable availability, high acceptability but potential low linkage to care among men who have sex with men and transgender women. Int J STD AIDS. 2017;28(2):133–137. Epub 2016/01/31. doi:10.1177/0956462416630674.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Martinez Perez G, Cox V, Ellman T, Moore A, Patten G, Shroufi A, et al. I know that I do have HIV but nobody saw Me’: oral HIV self-testing in an informal settlement in South Africa. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0152653. Epub 2016/04/05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152653.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. MacPherson P, Lalloo DG, Webb EL, Maheswaran H, Choko AT, Makombe SD, et al. Effect of optional home initiation of HIV care following HIV self-testing on antiretroviral therapy initiation among adults in Malawi: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312(4):372–379. Epub 2014/07/20. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.6493.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhong F, Tang W, Cheng W, Lin P, Wu Q, Cai Y, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of a social entrepreneurship testing model to promote HIV self-testing and linkage to care among men who have sex with men. HIV Med. 2017;18(5):376–382. Epub 2016/09/08. doi:10.1111/hiv.12437.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bien CH, Muessig KE, Lee R, Lo EJ, Yang LG, Yang B, et al. HIV and syphilis testing preferences among men who have sex with men in South China: a qualitative analysis to inform sexual health services. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124161. Epub 2015/04/16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124161.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Yan H, Yang H, Raymond HF, Li J, Shi LE, Huan X, et al. Experiences and correlates of HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men in Jiangsu province, China. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(3):485–491. Epub 2014/12/07. doi:10.1007/s10461-014-0968-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhong F, Tang W, Cheng W, Lin P, Wu Q, Cai Y, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of a social entrepreneurship testing model to promote HIV self-testing and linkage to care among men who have sex with men. HIV Med. 2016. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12437. Epub 2016/09/08.
  31. Han L, Bien C, Wei C, Muessig K, Yang M, Liu F, et al. HIV self-testing among online MSM in China: implications for expanding HIV testing among key populations. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67(2):216–21. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000278.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Han L, Wei C, Muessig KE, Bien CH, Meng G, Emch ME, et al. HIV test uptake among MSM in China: Implications for enhanced HIV test promotion campaigns among key populations. Glob Public Health. 2016:1–14. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1134612. Epub 2016/01/20.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement